From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] arm64: cpufeature: upgrade hyp caps to final
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:40:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201030164017.244287-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030164017.244287-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
We finalize caps before initializing kvm hyp code, and any use of
cpus_have_const_cap() in kvm hyp code generates redundant and
potentially unsound code to read the cpu_hwcaps array.
A number of helper functions used in both hyp context and regular kernel
context use cpus_have_const_cap(), as some regular kernel code runs
before the capabilities are finalized. It's tedious and error-prone to
write separate copies of these for hyp and non-hyp code.
So that we can avoid the redundant code, let's automatically upgrade
cpus_have_const_cap() to cpus_have_final_cap() when used in hyp context.
With this change, there's never a reason to access to cpu_hwcaps array
from hyp code, and we don't need to create an NVHE alias for this.
This should have no effect on non-hyp code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026134931.28246-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 12 ------------
arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9f671aa0419b..79d6a0371c78 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -375,6 +375,23 @@ cpucap_multi_entry_cap_matches(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
return false;
}
+static __always_inline bool is_vhe_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ /* Only defined for code run in VHE hyp context */
+ return __is_defined(__KVM_VHE_HYPERVISOR__);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool is_nvhe_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ /* Only defined for code run in NVHE hyp context */
+ return __is_defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool is_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ return is_vhe_hyp_code() || is_nvhe_hyp_code();
+}
+
extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
extern struct static_key_false cpu_hwcap_keys[ARM64_NCAPS];
extern struct static_key_false arm64_const_caps_ready;
@@ -444,8 +461,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
}
/*
- * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check.
+ * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check for non-hyp code.
*
+ * For hyp code, this behaves the same as cpus_have_final_cap().
+ *
+ * For non-hyp code:
* Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap().
* After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
*
@@ -453,7 +473,9 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
*/
static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
{
- if (system_capabilities_finalized())
+ if (is_hyp_code())
+ return cpus_have_final_cap(num);
+ else if (system_capabilities_finalized())
return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
else
return cpus_have_cap(num);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index 300be14ba77b..6069be50baf9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -83,18 +83,6 @@ static inline bool is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(void)
return read_sysreg(CurrentEL) == CurrentEL_EL2;
}
-static __always_inline bool is_vhe_hyp_code(void)
-{
- /* Only defined for code run in VHE hyp context */
- return __is_defined(__KVM_VHE_HYPERVISOR__);
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool is_nvhe_hyp_code(void)
-{
- /* Only defined for code run in NVHE hyp context */
- return __is_defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__);
-}
-
static __always_inline bool has_vhe(void)
{
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
index fbd4b6b1fde5..ad8432251733 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(__icache_flags);
/* Kernel symbols needed for cpus_have_final/const_caps checks. */
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(arm64_const_caps_ready);
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(cpu_hwcap_keys);
-KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(cpu_hwcaps);
/* Static keys which are set if a vGIC trap should be handled in hyp. */
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(vgic_v2_cpuif_trap);
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] arm64: cpufeature: upgrade hyp caps to final
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:40:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201030164017.244287-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030164017.244287-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
We finalize caps before initializing kvm hyp code, and any use of
cpus_have_const_cap() in kvm hyp code generates redundant and
potentially unsound code to read the cpu_hwcaps array.
A number of helper functions used in both hyp context and regular kernel
context use cpus_have_const_cap(), as some regular kernel code runs
before the capabilities are finalized. It's tedious and error-prone to
write separate copies of these for hyp and non-hyp code.
So that we can avoid the redundant code, let's automatically upgrade
cpus_have_const_cap() to cpus_have_final_cap() when used in hyp context.
With this change, there's never a reason to access to cpu_hwcaps array
from hyp code, and we don't need to create an NVHE alias for this.
This should have no effect on non-hyp code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026134931.28246-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 12 ------------
arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9f671aa0419b..79d6a0371c78 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -375,6 +375,23 @@ cpucap_multi_entry_cap_matches(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
return false;
}
+static __always_inline bool is_vhe_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ /* Only defined for code run in VHE hyp context */
+ return __is_defined(__KVM_VHE_HYPERVISOR__);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool is_nvhe_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ /* Only defined for code run in NVHE hyp context */
+ return __is_defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool is_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ return is_vhe_hyp_code() || is_nvhe_hyp_code();
+}
+
extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
extern struct static_key_false cpu_hwcap_keys[ARM64_NCAPS];
extern struct static_key_false arm64_const_caps_ready;
@@ -444,8 +461,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
}
/*
- * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check.
+ * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check for non-hyp code.
*
+ * For hyp code, this behaves the same as cpus_have_final_cap().
+ *
+ * For non-hyp code:
* Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap().
* After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
*
@@ -453,7 +473,9 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
*/
static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
{
- if (system_capabilities_finalized())
+ if (is_hyp_code())
+ return cpus_have_final_cap(num);
+ else if (system_capabilities_finalized())
return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
else
return cpus_have_cap(num);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index 300be14ba77b..6069be50baf9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -83,18 +83,6 @@ static inline bool is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(void)
return read_sysreg(CurrentEL) == CurrentEL_EL2;
}
-static __always_inline bool is_vhe_hyp_code(void)
-{
- /* Only defined for code run in VHE hyp context */
- return __is_defined(__KVM_VHE_HYPERVISOR__);
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool is_nvhe_hyp_code(void)
-{
- /* Only defined for code run in NVHE hyp context */
- return __is_defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__);
-}
-
static __always_inline bool has_vhe(void)
{
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
index fbd4b6b1fde5..ad8432251733 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(__icache_flags);
/* Kernel symbols needed for cpus_have_final/const_caps checks. */
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(arm64_const_caps_ready);
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(cpu_hwcap_keys);
-KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(cpu_hwcaps);
/* Static keys which are set if a vGIC trap should be handled in hyp. */
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(vgic_v2_cpuif_trap);
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] arm64: cpufeature: upgrade hyp caps to final
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:40:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201030164017.244287-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030164017.244287-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
We finalize caps before initializing kvm hyp code, and any use of
cpus_have_const_cap() in kvm hyp code generates redundant and
potentially unsound code to read the cpu_hwcaps array.
A number of helper functions used in both hyp context and regular kernel
context use cpus_have_const_cap(), as some regular kernel code runs
before the capabilities are finalized. It's tedious and error-prone to
write separate copies of these for hyp and non-hyp code.
So that we can avoid the redundant code, let's automatically upgrade
cpus_have_const_cap() to cpus_have_final_cap() when used in hyp context.
With this change, there's never a reason to access to cpu_hwcaps array
from hyp code, and we don't need to create an NVHE alias for this.
This should have no effect on non-hyp code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026134931.28246-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 12 ------------
arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9f671aa0419b..79d6a0371c78 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -375,6 +375,23 @@ cpucap_multi_entry_cap_matches(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
return false;
}
+static __always_inline bool is_vhe_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ /* Only defined for code run in VHE hyp context */
+ return __is_defined(__KVM_VHE_HYPERVISOR__);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool is_nvhe_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ /* Only defined for code run in NVHE hyp context */
+ return __is_defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool is_hyp_code(void)
+{
+ return is_vhe_hyp_code() || is_nvhe_hyp_code();
+}
+
extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
extern struct static_key_false cpu_hwcap_keys[ARM64_NCAPS];
extern struct static_key_false arm64_const_caps_ready;
@@ -444,8 +461,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
}
/*
- * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check.
+ * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check for non-hyp code.
*
+ * For hyp code, this behaves the same as cpus_have_final_cap().
+ *
+ * For non-hyp code:
* Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap().
* After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
*
@@ -453,7 +473,9 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
*/
static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
{
- if (system_capabilities_finalized())
+ if (is_hyp_code())
+ return cpus_have_final_cap(num);
+ else if (system_capabilities_finalized())
return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
else
return cpus_have_cap(num);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index 300be14ba77b..6069be50baf9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -83,18 +83,6 @@ static inline bool is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(void)
return read_sysreg(CurrentEL) == CurrentEL_EL2;
}
-static __always_inline bool is_vhe_hyp_code(void)
-{
- /* Only defined for code run in VHE hyp context */
- return __is_defined(__KVM_VHE_HYPERVISOR__);
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool is_nvhe_hyp_code(void)
-{
- /* Only defined for code run in NVHE hyp context */
- return __is_defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__);
-}
-
static __always_inline bool has_vhe(void)
{
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
index fbd4b6b1fde5..ad8432251733 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(__icache_flags);
/* Kernel symbols needed for cpus_have_final/const_caps checks. */
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(arm64_const_caps_ready);
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(cpu_hwcap_keys);
-KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(cpu_hwcaps);
/* Static keys which are set if a vGIC trap should be handled in hyp. */
KVM_NVHE_ALIAS(vgic_v2_cpuif_trap);
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-30 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 16:40 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.10, take #1 Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: arm64: Don't corrupt tpidr_el2 on failed HVC call Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: arm64: Remove leftover kern_hyp_va() in nVHE TLB invalidation Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: arm64: Drop useless PAN setting on host EL1 to EL2 transition Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: arm64: Allocate stage-2 pgd pages with GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: arm64: Fix AArch32 handling of DBGD{CCINT, SCRext} and DBGVCR Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: arm64: Fix AArch32 handling of DBGD{CCINT,SCRext} " Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: arm64: Fix AArch32 handling of DBGD{CCINT, SCRext} " Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] KVM: arm64: Fix masks in stage2_pte_cacheable() Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: arm64: Use fallback mapping sizes for contiguous huge page sizes Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 08/12] KVM: arm64: Force PTE mapping on fault resulting in a device mapping Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: arm64: Factor out is_{vhe,nvhe}_hyp_code() Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm64: cpufeature: reorder cpus_have_{const, final}_cap() Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 11/12] arm64: cpufeature: upgrade hyp caps to final Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: arm64: Handle Asymmetric AArch32 systems Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-30 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-31 14:35 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.10, take #1 Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-31 14:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-31 14:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201030164017.244287-12-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.