All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [stable-rc 4.14] shmctl04.c:115: TFAIL: SHM_INFO haven't returned a valid index: SUCCESS (0)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 13:57:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105125701.GD10395@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYu4RdH7zdd5MU=E-o+azMRx-EqR-7VYuJCUastKRd0KCA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!
> LTP syscalls test shmctl04 test modified in latest LTP release 20200930
> and this test reported as fail. so reporting to LTP mailing list.
> Failed on stable-rc 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4 branches but
> passed on stable-rc 4.19, 5.4 and 5.9 branches for arm64, arm, x86_64 and i386.
> 
> shmctl04.c:115: TFAIL: SHM_INFO haven't returned a valid index: SUCCESS (0)
> shmctl04.c:131: TFAIL: Counted used = 0, used_ids = 1
> shmctl04.c:72: TPASS: used_ids = 1
> shmctl04.c:79: TPASS: shm_rss = 0
> shmctl04.c:86: TPASS: shm_swp = 0
> shmctl04.c:93: TPASS: shm_tot = 1

Looks like SHM_STAT_ANY was added to kernel 4.17, that would explain why
shmctl() with SHM_STATA_ANY returns -1 on 4.14 and older but in that
case errno should be EINVAL and not set to zero.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>,
	Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [stable-rc 4.14] shmctl04.c:115: TFAIL: SHM_INFO haven't returned a valid index: SUCCESS (0)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 13:57:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105125701.GD10395@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYu4RdH7zdd5MU=E-o+azMRx-EqR-7VYuJCUastKRd0KCA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!
> LTP syscalls test shmctl04 test modified in latest LTP release 20200930
> and this test reported as fail. so reporting to LTP mailing list.
> Failed on stable-rc 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4 branches but
> passed on stable-rc 4.19, 5.4 and 5.9 branches for arm64, arm, x86_64 and i386.
> 
> shmctl04.c:115: TFAIL: SHM_INFO haven't returned a valid index: SUCCESS (0)
> shmctl04.c:131: TFAIL: Counted used = 0, used_ids = 1
> shmctl04.c:72: TPASS: used_ids = 1
> shmctl04.c:79: TPASS: shm_rss = 0
> shmctl04.c:86: TPASS: shm_swp = 0
> shmctl04.c:93: TPASS: shm_tot = 1

Looks like SHM_STAT_ANY was added to kernel 4.17, that would explain why
shmctl() with SHM_STATA_ANY returns -1 on 4.14 and older but in that
case errno should be EINVAL and not set to zero.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-04 11:25 [LTP] [stable-rc 4.14] shmctl04.c:115: TFAIL: SHM_INFO haven't returned a valid index: SUCCESS (0) Naresh Kamboju
2020-11-04 11:25 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-11-05 12:57 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2020-11-05 12:57   ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201105125701.GD10395@yuki.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.