From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Markus Wamser <Markus.Wamser@mixed-mode.de>,
Luke Hinds <lhinds@redhat.com>,
"open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:52:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106145252.GA10434@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFA6WYPetvod-Wov2n_L5TL771j+-kt+_csyWYT-uM=haEKMZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:02:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:37, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:31:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the functionality
> > > to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key. Also, this is
> > > an alternative in case platform doesn't possess a TPM device.
> > >
> > > This patch-set has been tested with OP-TEE based early TA which is already
> > > merged in upstream [1].
> >
> > Is the new RPI400 computer a platform that can be used for testing
> > patch sets like this? I've been looking for a while something ARM64
> > based with similar convenience as Intel NUC's, and on the surface
> > this new RPI product looks great for kernel testing purposes.
>
> Here [1] is the list of supported versions of Raspberry Pi in OP-TEE.
> The easiest approach would be to pick up a supported version or else
> do an OP-TEE port for an unsupported one (which should involve minimal
> effort).
>
> [1] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/rpi3.html#what-versions-of-raspberry-pi-will-work
>
> -Sumit
If porting is doable, then I'll just order RPI 400, and test with QEMU
up until either I port OP-TEE myself or someone else does it.
For seldom ARM testing, RPI 400 is really convenient device with its
boxed form factor.
/Jarkko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 16:52:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106145252.GA10434@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: < <CAFA6WYPetvod-Wov2n_L5TL771j+-kt+_csyWYT-uM=haEKMZQ@mail.gmail.com>>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1452 bytes --]
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:02:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:37, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:31:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the functionality
> > > to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key. Also, this is
> > > an alternative in case platform doesn't possess a TPM device.
> > >
> > > This patch-set has been tested with OP-TEE based early TA which is already
> > > merged in upstream [1].
> >
> > Is the new RPI400 computer a platform that can be used for testing
> > patch sets like this? I've been looking for a while something ARM64
> > based with similar convenience as Intel NUC's, and on the surface
> > this new RPI product looks great for kernel testing purposes.
>
> Here [1] is the list of supported versions of Raspberry Pi in OP-TEE.
> The easiest approach would be to pick up a supported version or else
> do an OP-TEE port for an unsupported one (which should involve minimal
> effort).
>
> [1] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/rpi3.html#what-versions-of-raspberry-pi-will-work
>
> -Sumit
If porting is doable, then I'll just order RPI 400, and test with QEMU
up until either I port OP-TEE myself or someone else does it.
For seldom ARM testing, RPI 400 is really convenient device with its
boxed form factor.
/Jarkko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Luke Hinds <lhinds@redhat.com>,
"open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Markus Wamser <Markus.Wamser@mixed-mode.de>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:52:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106145252.GA10434@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFA6WYPetvod-Wov2n_L5TL771j+-kt+_csyWYT-uM=haEKMZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:02:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:37, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:31:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the functionality
> > > to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key. Also, this is
> > > an alternative in case platform doesn't possess a TPM device.
> > >
> > > This patch-set has been tested with OP-TEE based early TA which is already
> > > merged in upstream [1].
> >
> > Is the new RPI400 computer a platform that can be used for testing
> > patch sets like this? I've been looking for a while something ARM64
> > based with similar convenience as Intel NUC's, and on the surface
> > this new RPI product looks great for kernel testing purposes.
>
> Here [1] is the list of supported versions of Raspberry Pi in OP-TEE.
> The easiest approach would be to pick up a supported version or else
> do an OP-TEE port for an unsupported one (which should involve minimal
> effort).
>
> [1] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/rpi3.html#what-versions-of-raspberry-pi-will-work
>
> -Sumit
If porting is doable, then I'll just order RPI 400, and test with QEMU
up until either I port OP-TEE myself or someone else does it.
For seldom ARM testing, RPI 400 is really convenient device with its
boxed form factor.
/Jarkko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 157+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 16:01 [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-24 3:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-24 3:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-24 3:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-15 13:13 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-15 13:13 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-15 13:13 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-10 17:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-10 17:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-10 17:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11 10:34 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-02-11 10:34 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-02-11 10:34 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-02-12 12:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-12 12:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-12 12:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-15 13:15 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-15 13:15 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-15 13:15 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] KEYS: trusted: Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-04 3:19 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-04 7:56 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-24 3:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-24 3:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-24 3:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-11 16:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-11 16:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-11 16:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-13 11:17 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-13 11:17 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-13 11:17 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-14 2:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 2:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-14 2:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-15 6:02 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-15 6:02 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-15 6:02 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-19 10:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-19 10:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-19 10:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 1:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 1:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 1:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 7:23 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-20 7:23 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-20 7:23 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-21 0:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 0:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 0:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <01000177223f74d3-1eef7685-4a19-40d2-ace6-d4cd7f35579d-000000@email.amazonses.com>
2021-01-21 8:44 ` Jerome Forissier
2021-01-21 8:44 ` Jerome Forissier
2021-01-21 8:44 ` Jerome Forissier
2021-01-21 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 15:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 15:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 15:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-21 16:23 ` Jerome Forissier
2021-01-21 16:23 ` Jerome Forissier
2021-01-21 16:23 ` Jerome Forissier
2021-01-22 18:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-22 18:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-22 18:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-25 9:17 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-25 9:17 ` Sumit Garg
2021-01-27 17:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-27 17:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-27 17:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-27 17:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-27 17:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-27 17:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-04 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-04 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-04 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11 23:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11 23:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11 23:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11 23:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11 23:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11 23:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-15 13:07 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-15 13:07 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-15 13:07 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-16 7:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-16 7:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-16 7:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-22 7:15 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-22 7:15 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-22 7:15 ` Sumit Garg
2021-02-24 16:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-24 16:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-24 16:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 13:36 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-01-20 13:36 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-01-20 13:36 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-03 16:01 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] doc: trusted-encrypted: updates with TEE as a new trust source Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-12-02 19:34 ` gmail Elaine Palmer
2020-12-02 19:34 ` gmail Elaine Palmer
2020-12-02 19:34 ` gmail Elaine Palmer
2020-12-04 15:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-04 15:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-04 15:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-08 15:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 15:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 15:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 17:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-08 17:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-08 17:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-09 16:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-09 16:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-09 16:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-11 10:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-11 10:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-11 10:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-11 15:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-11 15:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-11 15:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-06 18:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-06 18:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-06 18:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-08 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 17:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 17:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-08 17:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-03 16:01 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as Trusted Keys co-maintainer Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-24 3:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-24 3:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-24 3:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-05 5:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-05 5:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-06 9:32 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-06 9:32 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-06 9:32 ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-06 14:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-11-06 14:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-06 14:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-04 5:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-04 5:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-04 5:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-08 11:51 ` Sumit Garg
2020-12-08 11:51 ` Sumit Garg
2020-12-08 11:51 ` Sumit Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201106145252.GA10434@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=Markus.Wamser@mixed-mode.de \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=janne.karhunen@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lhinds@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.