From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
张东旭 <xu910121@sina.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dave.martin@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:44:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106164416.326787-6-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106164416.326787-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
The AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors are just the general accessors with
its visibility function open-coded. It also skips the if-else
chain in read_id_reg, but there's no reason not to go there.
Indeed consolidating ID register accessors and removing lines
of code make it worthwhile.
Remove the AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors, replacing them with the
general accessors for sanitized ID registers.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105091022.15373-5-drjones@redhat.com
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 61 +++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 4ee098abd87c..436043cd327e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1154,6 +1154,16 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static unsigned int id_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
+ u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
+ (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
+
+ switch (id) {
+ case SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1:
+ if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+ return REG_RAZ;
+ break;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1201,55 +1211,6 @@ static unsigned int sve_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return REG_HIDDEN;
}
-/* Generate the emulated ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 value exposed to the guest */
-static u64 guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
- return 0;
-
- return read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1);
-}
-
-static bool access_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- struct sys_reg_params *p,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
-{
- if (p->is_write)
- return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, rd);
-
- p->regval = guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu);
- return true;
-}
-
-static int get_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
- const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
-{
- u64 val;
-
- val = guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu);
- return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, reg->id);
-}
-
-static int set_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
- const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
-{
- const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
- int err;
- u64 val;
-
- err = reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
- if (val != guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* cpufeature ID register user accessors
*
@@ -1506,7 +1467,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,2),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,3),
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1), access_id_aa64zfr0_el1, .get_user = get_id_aa64zfr0_el1, .set_user = set_id_aa64zfr0_el1, },
+ ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,5),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,6),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,7),
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Gavin Shan" <gshan@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>, 张东旭 <xu910121@sina.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
dave.martin@arm.com,
"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:44:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106164416.326787-6-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106164416.326787-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
The AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors are just the general accessors with
its visibility function open-coded. It also skips the if-else
chain in read_id_reg, but there's no reason not to go there.
Indeed consolidating ID register accessors and removing lines
of code make it worthwhile.
Remove the AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors, replacing them with the
general accessors for sanitized ID registers.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105091022.15373-5-drjones@redhat.com
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 61 +++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 4ee098abd87c..436043cd327e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1154,6 +1154,16 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static unsigned int id_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
+ u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
+ (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
+
+ switch (id) {
+ case SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1:
+ if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+ return REG_RAZ;
+ break;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1201,55 +1211,6 @@ static unsigned int sve_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return REG_HIDDEN;
}
-/* Generate the emulated ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 value exposed to the guest */
-static u64 guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
- return 0;
-
- return read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1);
-}
-
-static bool access_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- struct sys_reg_params *p,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
-{
- if (p->is_write)
- return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, rd);
-
- p->regval = guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu);
- return true;
-}
-
-static int get_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
- const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
-{
- u64 val;
-
- val = guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu);
- return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, reg->id);
-}
-
-static int set_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
- const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
-{
- const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
- int err;
- u64 val;
-
- err = reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
- if (val != guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* cpufeature ID register user accessors
*
@@ -1506,7 +1467,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,2),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,3),
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1), access_id_aa64zfr0_el1, .get_user = get_id_aa64zfr0_el1, .set_user = set_id_aa64zfr0_el1, },
+ ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,5),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,6),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,7),
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Gavin Shan" <gshan@redhat.com>, 张东旭 <xu910121@sina.com>,
dave.martin@arm.com, "James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:44:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106164416.326787-6-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106164416.326787-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
The AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors are just the general accessors with
its visibility function open-coded. It also skips the if-else
chain in read_id_reg, but there's no reason not to go there.
Indeed consolidating ID register accessors and removing lines
of code make it worthwhile.
Remove the AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors, replacing them with the
general accessors for sanitized ID registers.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105091022.15373-5-drjones@redhat.com
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 61 +++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 4ee098abd87c..436043cd327e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1154,6 +1154,16 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static unsigned int id_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
+ u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
+ (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
+
+ switch (id) {
+ case SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1:
+ if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+ return REG_RAZ;
+ break;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1201,55 +1211,6 @@ static unsigned int sve_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return REG_HIDDEN;
}
-/* Generate the emulated ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 value exposed to the guest */
-static u64 guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
- return 0;
-
- return read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1);
-}
-
-static bool access_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- struct sys_reg_params *p,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
-{
- if (p->is_write)
- return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, rd);
-
- p->regval = guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu);
- return true;
-}
-
-static int get_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
- const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
-{
- u64 val;
-
- val = guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu);
- return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, reg->id);
-}
-
-static int set_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
- const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
-{
- const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
- int err;
- u64 val;
-
- err = reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
- if (val != guest_id_aa64zfr0_el1(vcpu))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* cpufeature ID register user accessors
*
@@ -1506,7 +1467,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,2),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,3),
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1), access_id_aa64zfr0_el1, .get_user = get_id_aa64zfr0_el1, .set_user = set_id_aa64zfr0_el1, },
+ ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,5),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,6),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,7),
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-06 16:44 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.10, take #2 Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Fix build error in user_mem_abort() Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: Don't hide ID registers from userspace Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Consolidate REG_HIDDEN_GUEST/USER Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Check RAZ visibility in ID register accessors Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-11-06 16:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove AA64ZFR0_EL1 accessors Marc Zyngier
2020-11-06 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-08 9:15 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.10, take #2 Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-08 9:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-08 9:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201106164416.326787-6-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xu910121@sina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.