All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-hams@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Subject: [Bridge] [RFC net-next 09/28] bonding: use siocdevprivate
Date: Fri,  6 Nov 2020 23:17:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106221743.3271965-10-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106221743.3271965-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The bonding driver supports two command codes for each operation: one
in the SIOCDEVPRIVATE range and another one with the same definition
but a unique command code.

Only the second set currently works in compat mode, as the ifr_data
expansion overwrites part of the ifr_slave field.

Move the private ones into ndo_siocdevprivate and change the
implementation to call the other function.  This makes both version
work correctly.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 84ecbc6fa0ff..5a2956fec025 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3781,7 +3781,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 		}
 
 		return 0;
-	case BOND_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDINFOQUERY:
 		u_binfo = (struct ifbond __user *)ifr->ifr_data;
 
@@ -3793,7 +3792,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 			return -EFAULT;
 
 		return 0;
-	case BOND_SLAVE_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDSLAVEINFOQUERY:
 		u_sinfo = (struct ifslave __user *)ifr->ifr_data;
 
@@ -3823,19 +3821,15 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	switch (cmd) {
-	case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDENSLAVE:
 		res = bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev, NULL);
 		break;
-	case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDRELEASE:
 		res = bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
 		break;
-	case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
 		res = bond_set_dev_addr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
 		break;
-	case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
 		bond_opt_initstr(&newval, slave_dev->name);
 		res = __bond_opt_set_notify(bond, BOND_OPT_ACTIVE_SLAVE,
@@ -3848,6 +3842,28 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 	return res;
 }
 
+static int bond_siocdevprivate(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr,
+			       void __user *data, int cmd)
+{
+	struct ifreq ifrdata = { .ifr_data = data };
+	switch (cmd) {
+	case BOND_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, &ifrdata, SIOCBONDINFOQUERY);
+	case BOND_SLAVE_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, &ifrdata, SIOCBONDSLAVEINFOQUERY);
+	case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDENSLAVE);
+	case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDRELEASE);
+	case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDSETHWADDR);
+	case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE);
+	}
+
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static void bond_change_rx_flags(struct net_device *bond_dev, int change)
 {
 	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
@@ -4642,6 +4658,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops bond_netdev_ops = {
 	.ndo_select_queue	= bond_select_queue,
 	.ndo_get_stats64	= bond_get_stats,
 	.ndo_do_ioctl		= bond_do_ioctl,
+	.ndo_siocdevprivate	= bond_siocdevprivate,
 	.ndo_change_rx_flags	= bond_change_rx_flags,
 	.ndo_set_rx_mode	= bond_set_rx_mode,
 	.ndo_change_mtu		= bond_change_mtu,
-- 
2.27.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC net-next 09/28] bonding: use siocdevprivate
Date: Fri,  6 Nov 2020 23:17:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106221743.3271965-10-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106221743.3271965-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The bonding driver supports two command codes for each operation: one
in the SIOCDEVPRIVATE range and another one with the same definition
but a unique command code.

Only the second set currently works in compat mode, as the ifr_data
expansion overwrites part of the ifr_slave field.

Move the private ones into ndo_siocdevprivate and change the
implementation to call the other function.  This makes both version
work correctly.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 84ecbc6fa0ff..5a2956fec025 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3781,7 +3781,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 		}
 
 		return 0;
-	case BOND_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDINFOQUERY:
 		u_binfo = (struct ifbond __user *)ifr->ifr_data;
 
@@ -3793,7 +3792,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 			return -EFAULT;
 
 		return 0;
-	case BOND_SLAVE_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDSLAVEINFOQUERY:
 		u_sinfo = (struct ifslave __user *)ifr->ifr_data;
 
@@ -3823,19 +3821,15 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	switch (cmd) {
-	case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDENSLAVE:
 		res = bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev, NULL);
 		break;
-	case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDRELEASE:
 		res = bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
 		break;
-	case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
 		res = bond_set_dev_addr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
 		break;
-	case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
 	case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
 		bond_opt_initstr(&newval, slave_dev->name);
 		res = __bond_opt_set_notify(bond, BOND_OPT_ACTIVE_SLAVE,
@@ -3848,6 +3842,28 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 	return res;
 }
 
+static int bond_siocdevprivate(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr,
+			       void __user *data, int cmd)
+{
+	struct ifreq ifrdata = { .ifr_data = data };
+	switch (cmd) {
+	case BOND_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, &ifrdata, SIOCBONDINFOQUERY);
+	case BOND_SLAVE_INFO_QUERY_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, &ifrdata, SIOCBONDSLAVEINFOQUERY);
+	case BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDENSLAVE);
+	case BOND_RELEASE_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDRELEASE);
+	case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDSETHWADDR);
+	case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
+		return bond_do_ioctl(bond_dev, ifr, SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE);
+	}
+
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static void bond_change_rx_flags(struct net_device *bond_dev, int change)
 {
 	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
@@ -4642,6 +4658,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops bond_netdev_ops = {
 	.ndo_select_queue	= bond_select_queue,
 	.ndo_get_stats64	= bond_get_stats,
 	.ndo_do_ioctl		= bond_do_ioctl,
+	.ndo_siocdevprivate	= bond_siocdevprivate,
 	.ndo_change_rx_flags	= bond_change_rx_flags,
 	.ndo_set_rx_mode	= bond_set_rx_mode,
 	.ndo_change_mtu		= bond_change_mtu,
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-06 22:17 [Bridge] [RFC net-next 00/28] ndo_ioctl rework Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 01/28] net: split out SIOCDEVPRIVATE handling from dev_ioctl Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 02/28] staging: rtlwifi: use siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 03/28] staging: wlan-ng: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 04/28] hostap: use ndo_siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 05/28] wireless: remove old ioctls Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 06/28] bridge: use ndo_siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 07/28] phonet: use siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 08/28] tulip: use ndo_siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-11-06 22:17   ` [RFC net-next 09/28] bonding: use siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 10/28] appletalk: use ndo_siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 11/28] hamachi: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 12/28] tehuti: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 13/28] eql: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 14/28] fddi: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 15/28] net: usb: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 16/28] slip/plip: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 17/28] qeth: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 18/28] cxgb3: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 19/28] dev_ioctl: pass SIOCDEVPRIVATE data separately Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 20/28] dev_ioctl: split out ndo_eth_ioctl Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 21/28] wan: use ndo_siocdevprivate Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 22/28] hamradio: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 23/28] airo: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 24/28] ip_tunnel: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 25/28] hippi: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 26/28] sb1000: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 27/28] ppp: " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 28/28] net: socket: return changed ifreq from SIOCDEVPRIVATE Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-06 22:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-08  0:06 ` [Bridge] [RFC net-next 00/28] ndo_ioctl rework Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-08  0:06   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-08  0:06   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-08  8:27   ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-08  8:27     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-08 11:21   ` [Bridge] " Kalle Valo
2020-11-08 11:21     ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-08 11:42     ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-08 11:42       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-08 11:42       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-09 11:25       ` [Bridge] " Kalle Valo
2020-11-09 11:25         ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-09 11:25         ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201106221743.3271965-10-arnd@kernel.org \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.