From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c:78:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:10:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112161043.brhpuo7rykdip3hs@mobilestation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112164301.60032276@xps13>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Thu, 12 Nov
> 2020 18:27:39 +0300:
>
> > Hello Vignesh
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 08:30:42PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/12/20 1:57 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > > Hi Sergey,
> > > >
> > > > Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Wed, 11 Nov
> > > > 2020 22:22:59 +0300:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > >>> Hi Serge,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Tue, 10 Nov
> > > >>> 2020 14:38:27 +0300:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hello Miquel,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> A situation noted by the warning below won't cause any problem because
> > > >>>> the casting is done to a non-dereferenced variable. It is utilized
> > > >>>> as a pointer bias later in that function. Shall we just ignore the
> > > >>>> warning or still fix it somehow?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>> Do you think the cast to a !__iomem value is mandatory here?
> > > >>
> > > >> It's not mandatory to have the casting with no __iomem, but wouldn't
> > > >> doing like this:
> > > >> + shift = (ssize_t __iomem)src & 0x3;
> > > >> be looking weird? Really, is there a good way to somehow extract the first
> > > >> two bits of a __iomem pointer without getting the sparse warning?
> > > >
> > > > I asked around me, what about trying uintptr_t?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > > One more way is to use __force to tell sparse that this casting is
> > > intentional:
> > >
> > > shift = (__force ssize_t)src & 0x3;
> >
> > Oh, great! That solution is actually much better than using some
> > currently unexplained sparse peculiarity! I was thinking about applying
> > some other attribute, but __force just didn't come to my mind. Thank
> > you very much for the suggestion. I'll post the fix with the solution
> > suggested by you.
>
> Is the ssize_t cast the right one btw? I would definitely prefer an
> unsigned type here.
The reason of me deciding to use the ssize_t type here was to prevent
the types casting across the "shift", "chunk" and "len" variables
within this method. It seemed a bit better than having a standard type
like "unsigned int" here seeing the ssize_t type width won't exceed
the long type size anyway. Moreover since the "len" variable has got
the ssize_t type and I couldn't change it (the method is the map_info
callback), I've decided to stick with what is available and defined
"shift" and "chunk" as ssize_t-es. Another callback method
bt1_rom_map_read() in his module has been designed in the same way.
Do you think it's better to change it in favor of using a different
type like "unsigned int" here anyway? If so for unification I'd need to
change bt1_rom_map_read() (though the "shift" variable has been
defined as "unsigned long" there in the first place because the offs
argument has got that type).
What to do with the __force attribute here? It does seem appropriate
even if for some mystical reasons we haven't got the sparse warning
for the unsigned types.
-Sergey
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c:78:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:10:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112161043.brhpuo7rykdip3hs@mobilestation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112164301.60032276@xps13>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3298 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Thu, 12 Nov
> 2020 18:27:39 +0300:
>
> > Hello Vignesh
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 08:30:42PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/12/20 1:57 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > > Hi Sergey,
> > > >
> > > > Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Wed, 11 Nov
> > > > 2020 22:22:59 +0300:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > >>> Hi Serge,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Tue, 10 Nov
> > > >>> 2020 14:38:27 +0300:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hello Miquel,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> A situation noted by the warning below won't cause any problem because
> > > >>>> the casting is done to a non-dereferenced variable. It is utilized
> > > >>>> as a pointer bias later in that function. Shall we just ignore the
> > > >>>> warning or still fix it somehow?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>> Do you think the cast to a !__iomem value is mandatory here?
> > > >>
> > > >> It's not mandatory to have the casting with no __iomem, but wouldn't
> > > >> doing like this:
> > > >> + shift = (ssize_t __iomem)src & 0x3;
> > > >> be looking weird? Really, is there a good way to somehow extract the first
> > > >> two bits of a __iomem pointer without getting the sparse warning?
> > > >
> > > > I asked around me, what about trying uintptr_t?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > > One more way is to use __force to tell sparse that this casting is
> > > intentional:
> > >
> > > shift = (__force ssize_t)src & 0x3;
> >
> > Oh, great! That solution is actually much better than using some
> > currently unexplained sparse peculiarity! I was thinking about applying
> > some other attribute, but __force just didn't come to my mind. Thank
> > you very much for the suggestion. I'll post the fix with the solution
> > suggested by you.
>
> Is the ssize_t cast the right one btw? I would definitely prefer an
> unsigned type here.
The reason of me deciding to use the ssize_t type here was to prevent
the types casting across the "shift", "chunk" and "len" variables
within this method. It seemed a bit better than having a standard type
like "unsigned int" here seeing the ssize_t type width won't exceed
the long type size anyway. Moreover since the "len" variable has got
the ssize_t type and I couldn't change it (the method is the map_info
callback), I've decided to stick with what is available and defined
"shift" and "chunk" as ssize_t-es. Another callback method
bt1_rom_map_read() in his module has been designed in the same way.
Do you think it's better to change it in favor of using a different
type like "unsigned int" here anyway? If so for unification I'd need to
change bt1_rom_map_read() (though the "shift" variable has been
defined as "unsigned long" there in the first place because the offs
argument has got that type).
What to do with the __force attribute here? It does seem appropriate
even if for some mystical reasons we haven't got the sparse warning
for the unsigned types.
-Sergey
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c:78:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:10:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112161043.brhpuo7rykdip3hs@mobilestation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112164301.60032276@xps13>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Thu, 12 Nov
> 2020 18:27:39 +0300:
>
> > Hello Vignesh
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 08:30:42PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/12/20 1:57 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > > Hi Sergey,
> > > >
> > > > Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Wed, 11 Nov
> > > > 2020 22:22:59 +0300:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > >>> Hi Serge,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> wrote on Tue, 10 Nov
> > > >>> 2020 14:38:27 +0300:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hello Miquel,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> A situation noted by the warning below won't cause any problem because
> > > >>>> the casting is done to a non-dereferenced variable. It is utilized
> > > >>>> as a pointer bias later in that function. Shall we just ignore the
> > > >>>> warning or still fix it somehow?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>> Do you think the cast to a !__iomem value is mandatory here?
> > > >>
> > > >> It's not mandatory to have the casting with no __iomem, but wouldn't
> > > >> doing like this:
> > > >> + shift = (ssize_t __iomem)src & 0x3;
> > > >> be looking weird? Really, is there a good way to somehow extract the first
> > > >> two bits of a __iomem pointer without getting the sparse warning?
> > > >
> > > > I asked around me, what about trying uintptr_t?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > > One more way is to use __force to tell sparse that this casting is
> > > intentional:
> > >
> > > shift = (__force ssize_t)src & 0x3;
> >
> > Oh, great! That solution is actually much better than using some
> > currently unexplained sparse peculiarity! I was thinking about applying
> > some other attribute, but __force just didn't come to my mind. Thank
> > you very much for the suggestion. I'll post the fix with the solution
> > suggested by you.
>
> Is the ssize_t cast the right one btw? I would definitely prefer an
> unsigned type here.
The reason of me deciding to use the ssize_t type here was to prevent
the types casting across the "shift", "chunk" and "len" variables
within this method. It seemed a bit better than having a standard type
like "unsigned int" here seeing the ssize_t type width won't exceed
the long type size anyway. Moreover since the "len" variable has got
the ssize_t type and I couldn't change it (the method is the map_info
callback), I've decided to stick with what is available and defined
"shift" and "chunk" as ssize_t-es. Another callback method
bt1_rom_map_read() in his module has been designed in the same way.
Do you think it's better to change it in favor of using a different
type like "unsigned int" here anyway? If so for unification I'd need to
change bt1_rom_map_read() (though the "shift" variable has been
defined as "unsigned long" there in the first place because the offs
argument has got that type).
What to do with the __force attribute here? It does seem appropriate
even if for some mystical reasons we haven't got the sparse warning
for the unsigned types.
-Sergey
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 4:42 drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c:78:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression kernel test robot
2020-11-02 4:42 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-10 11:38 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-10 11:38 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-10 11:38 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-10 15:35 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-10 15:35 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-10 15:35 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-11 19:22 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-11 19:22 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-11 19:22 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 8:27 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 8:27 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 8:27 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 11:20 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 11:20 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 11:20 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 15:00 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2020-11-12 15:00 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2020-11-12 15:00 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2020-11-12 15:27 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 15:27 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 15:27 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 15:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 15:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 15:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 16:10 ` Serge Semin [this message]
2020-11-12 16:10 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 16:10 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 16:15 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 16:15 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 16:15 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-11-12 16:21 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 16:21 ` Serge Semin
2020-11-12 16:21 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201112161043.brhpuo7rykdip3hs@mobilestation \
--to=sergey.semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.