From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Error: invalid switch -me200
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:50:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201114005015.GZ2672@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFP8O3+NowYwhMAywd=R23HgOYnroWV9ZRkdyAejd08qsOF=6w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > >
> > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200) += -Wa,-me200
> > > > >
> > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > >
> > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> >
> > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > thing, too). But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> >
> > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>
> CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
>
> Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
doesn't exist (in mainline binutils). Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
instead.
Segher
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Subject: Re: Error: invalid switch -me200
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:50:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201114005015.GZ2672@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFP8O3+NowYwhMAywd=R23HgOYnroWV9ZRkdyAejd08qsOF=6w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > >
> > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200) += -Wa,-me200
> > > > >
> > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > >
> > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> >
> > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > thing, too). But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> >
> > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>
> CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
>
> Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
doesn't exist (in mainline binutils). Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
instead.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-14 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-13 3:21 Error: invalid switch -me200 kernel test robot
2020-11-13 3:21 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-13 17:28 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2020-11-13 17:28 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2020-11-13 19:08 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 19:08 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 19:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-13 19:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-13 19:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-13 20:04 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 20:04 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 20:04 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 20:14 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-13 20:14 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-13 20:14 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-14 0:20 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-14 0:20 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-14 0:37 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2020-11-14 0:37 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2020-11-14 0:37 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2020-11-14 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2020-11-14 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-16 20:27 ` Scott Wood
2020-11-16 20:27 ` Scott Wood
2020-11-16 20:27 ` Scott Wood
2020-11-16 20:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-16 20:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-16 23:59 ` Alan Modra
2020-11-16 23:59 ` Alan Modra
2020-11-16 23:59 ` Alan Modra
2020-11-14 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-14 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-14 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-16 6:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-16 6:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-16 6:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-16 15:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-16 15:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-16 15:26 ` Christophe Leroy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-02 8:48 kernel test robot
2020-10-02 8:48 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-29 16:50 kernel test robot
2020-07-29 16:50 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201114005015.GZ2672@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bcain@codeaurora.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.