From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Camelia Alexandra Groza \(OSS\)" <camelia.groza@oss.nxp.com>,
"Madalin Bucur \(OSS\)" <madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: fsl: DPAA FMan DMA operations are coherent
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:06:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116070652.GA5849@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR04MB3976F19056A613AC92118A2FECE80@AM6PR04MB3976.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0000, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On
> > Behalf Of Shawn Guo
> > To: Madalin Bucur (OSS) <madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: fsl: DPAA FMan DMA operations are
> > coherent
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:46:39PM +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > > Although the DPAA 1 FMan operations are coherent, the device tree
> > > node for the FMan does not indicate that, resulting in a needless
> > > loss of performance. Adding the missing dma-coherent property.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1ffbecdd8321 ("arm64: dts: add DPAA FMan nodes")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com>
> > > Tested-by: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@oss.nxp.com>
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
>
> Hi, Shawn,
>
> will this fix for the device trees be picked up in the stable trees as well?
> Do I need to do something about it?
When it's landed in Linus' tree, stable kernel will pick it up due to
the Fixes: tag there. So you do not need to do anything about it.
>
> Thanks
> Madalin
>
> PS: will this make it into v5.10 or v5.11?
I'm sending it to arm-soc folks as a material for v5.10-rc. So if
everything goes well, it will get into v5.10.
Shawn
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>
Cc: "Madalin Bucur (OSS)" <madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Camelia Alexandra Groza (OSS)" <camelia.groza@oss.nxp.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: fsl: DPAA FMan DMA operations are coherent
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:06:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116070652.GA5849@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR04MB3976F19056A613AC92118A2FECE80@AM6PR04MB3976.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 03:33:19PM +0000, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On
> > Behalf Of Shawn Guo
> > To: Madalin Bucur (OSS) <madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: fsl: DPAA FMan DMA operations are
> > coherent
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:46:39PM +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > > Although the DPAA 1 FMan operations are coherent, the device tree
> > > node for the FMan does not indicate that, resulting in a needless
> > > loss of performance. Adding the missing dma-coherent property.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1ffbecdd8321 ("arm64: dts: add DPAA FMan nodes")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com>
> > > Tested-by: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@oss.nxp.com>
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
>
> Hi, Shawn,
>
> will this fix for the device trees be picked up in the stable trees as well?
> Do I need to do something about it?
When it's landed in Linus' tree, stable kernel will pick it up due to
the Fixes: tag there. So you do not need to do anything about it.
>
> Thanks
> Madalin
>
> PS: will this make it into v5.10 or v5.11?
I'm sending it to arm-soc folks as a material for v5.10-rc. So if
everything goes well, it will get into v5.10.
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-16 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-05 12:46 [PATCH] arm64: dts: fsl: DPAA FMan DMA operations are coherent Madalin Bucur
2020-10-05 12:46 ` Madalin Bucur
2020-10-05 15:07 ` Li Yang
2020-10-05 15:07 ` Li Yang
2020-10-30 7:39 ` Shawn Guo
2020-10-30 7:39 ` Shawn Guo
2020-11-11 15:33 ` Madalin Bucur
2020-11-11 15:33 ` Madalin Bucur
2020-11-16 7:06 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2020-11-16 7:06 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201116070652.GA5849@dragon \
--to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=camelia.groza@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=madalin.bucur@nxp.com \
--cc=madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.