All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bilal Wasim <bilalwasim676@gmail.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Modify horizontal front/back porch byte formula
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:29:50 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120052950.0ca597fb@a-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119232335.6704-1-chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

Hi CK, 

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:23:35 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> 
> In the patch to be fixed, horizontal_backporch_byte become to large
> for some panel, so roll back that patch. For small hfp or hbp panel,
> using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> 
> Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with
> small hfp or hbp")
> 
> Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 61
> +++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 39
> deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index 4a188a942c38..65fd99c528af
> 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> +	u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> +	u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
>  	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> +	u32 delta;
>  	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>  
>  	struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> @@ -466,50 +469,30 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10); 
>  	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> -		horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +		horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10; else
>  		horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch +
> vm->hsync_len) *
> -					    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +					    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10;
>  
>  	data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> -			  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> -
> -	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> -		if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> -		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> -				vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> -				vm->hfront_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -
> -			horizontal_backporch_byte =
> -				horizontal_backporch_byte -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> -				vm->hback_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -		} else {
> -			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> -						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> -		}
> +			  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit +
> 3; +
> +	delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 :
> 12; +
> +	horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +	horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> horizontal_backporch_byte;
> +	data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> +
> +	if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> +		horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> +		horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_backporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> -		if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> -		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> -				vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> -				vm->hfront_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -			horizontal_backporch_byte =
> horizontal_backporch_byte -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> -				vm->hback_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -		} else {
> -			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> -						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> -		}
> +		DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> 60Hz\n"); }
>  
>  	writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);

Tested on Chromebook ELM.

Tested-by: Bilal Wasim <bilal.wasim@imgtec.com>

Thanks,
Bilal

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bilal Wasim <bilalwasim676@gmail.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Modify horizontal front/back porch byte formula
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:29:50 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120052950.0ca597fb@a-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119232335.6704-1-chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

Hi CK, 

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:23:35 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> 
> In the patch to be fixed, horizontal_backporch_byte become to large
> for some panel, so roll back that patch. For small hfp or hbp panel,
> using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> 
> Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with
> small hfp or hbp")
> 
> Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 61
> +++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 39
> deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index 4a188a942c38..65fd99c528af
> 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> +	u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> +	u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
>  	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> +	u32 delta;
>  	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>  
>  	struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> @@ -466,50 +469,30 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10); 
>  	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> -		horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +		horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10; else
>  		horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch +
> vm->hsync_len) *
> -					    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +					    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10;
>  
>  	data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> -			  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> -
> -	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> -		if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> -		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> -				vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> -				vm->hfront_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -
> -			horizontal_backporch_byte =
> -				horizontal_backporch_byte -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> -				vm->hback_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -		} else {
> -			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> -						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> -		}
> +			  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit +
> 3; +
> +	delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 :
> 12; +
> +	horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +	horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> horizontal_backporch_byte;
> +	data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> +
> +	if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> +		horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> +		horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_backporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> -		if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> -		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> -				vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> -				vm->hfront_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -			horizontal_backporch_byte =
> horizontal_backporch_byte -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> -				vm->hback_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -		} else {
> -			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> -						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> -		}
> +		DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> 60Hz\n"); }
>  
>  	writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);

Tested on Chromebook ELM.

Tested-by: Bilal Wasim <bilal.wasim@imgtec.com>

Thanks,
Bilal
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bilal Wasim <bilalwasim676@gmail.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Modify horizontal front/back porch byte formula
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:29:50 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120052950.0ca597fb@a-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119232335.6704-1-chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

Hi CK, 

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:23:35 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> 
> In the patch to be fixed, horizontal_backporch_byte become to large
> for some panel, so roll back that patch. For small hfp or hbp panel,
> using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> 
> Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with
> small hfp or hbp")
> 
> Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 61
> +++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 39
> deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index 4a188a942c38..65fd99c528af
> 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
>  	u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> +	u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> +	u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
>  	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> +	u32 delta;
>  	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>  
>  	struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> @@ -466,50 +469,30 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10); 
>  	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> -		horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +		horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10; else
>  		horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch +
> vm->hsync_len) *
> -					    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +					    dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10;
>  
>  	data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> -			  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> -
> -	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> -		if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> -		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> -				vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> -				vm->hfront_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -
> -			horizontal_backporch_byte =
> -				horizontal_backporch_byte -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> -				vm->hback_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -		} else {
> -			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> -						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> -		}
> +			  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit +
> 3; +
> +	delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 :
> 12; +
> +	horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> +	horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> horizontal_backporch_byte;
> +	data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> +
> +	if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> +		horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> +		horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_backporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> -		if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> -		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> -				vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> -				vm->hfront_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -			horizontal_backporch_byte =
> horizontal_backporch_byte -
> -				(data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> -				vm->hback_porch /
> -				(vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -		} else {
> -			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> -			horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> -						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> -		}
> +		DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> 60Hz\n"); }
>  
>  	writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);

Tested on Chromebook ELM.

Tested-by: Bilal Wasim <bilal.wasim@imgtec.com>

Thanks,
Bilal

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-20  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19 23:23 [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Modify horizontal front/back porch byte formula Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-11-19 23:23 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-11-19 23:23 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-11-20  0:29 ` Bilal Wasim [this message]
2020-11-20  0:29   ` Bilal Wasim
2020-11-20  0:29   ` Bilal Wasim
2020-11-21 10:37   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-11-21 10:37     ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-11-21 10:37     ` Chun-Kuang Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201120052950.0ca597fb@a-VirtualBox \
    --to=bilalwasim676@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
    --cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jitao.shi@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.