From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] sched: Introduce restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit task CPU affinity
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:49:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127094940.GA906877@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124155039.13804-8-will@kernel.org>
On Tuesday 24 Nov 2020 at 15:50:32 (+0000), Will Deacon wrote:
> Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support
> across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by
> some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do
> not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters.
>
> Although userspace can carefully manage the affinity masks for such
> tasks, one place where it is particularly problematic is execve()
> because the CPU on which the execve() is occurring may be incompatible
> with the new application image. In such a situation, it is desirable to
> restrict the affinity mask of the task and ensure that the new image is
> entered on a compatible CPU. From userspace's point of view, this looks
> the same as if the incompatible CPUs have been hotplugged off in its
> affinity mask.
>
> In preparation for restricting the affinity mask for compat tasks on
> arm64 systems without uniform support for 32-bit applications, introduce
> a restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(), which allows the current affinity mask
> for a task to be shrunk to the intersection of a parameter mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Thanks,
Quentin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] sched: Introduce restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit task CPU affinity
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:49:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127094940.GA906877@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124155039.13804-8-will@kernel.org>
On Tuesday 24 Nov 2020 at 15:50:32 (+0000), Will Deacon wrote:
> Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support
> across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by
> some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do
> not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters.
>
> Although userspace can carefully manage the affinity masks for such
> tasks, one place where it is particularly problematic is execve()
> because the CPU on which the execve() is occurring may be incompatible
> with the new application image. In such a situation, it is desirable to
> restrict the affinity mask of the task and ensure that the new image is
> entered on a compatible CPU. From userspace's point of view, this looks
> the same as if the incompatible CPUs have been hotplugged off in its
> affinity mask.
>
> In preparation for restricting the affinity mask for compat tasks on
> arm64 systems without uniform support for 32-bit applications, introduce
> a restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(), which allows the current affinity mask
> for a task to be shrunk to the intersection of a parameter mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Thanks,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-27 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 15:50 [PATCH v4 00/14] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 10:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 10:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 11:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 11:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 13:09 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:09 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 13:16 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 13:16 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 10:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 10:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 11:53 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 11:53 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 17:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 17:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 17:24 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-27 17:24 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-27 18:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 18:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-01 16:57 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 16:57 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 8:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-02 8:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-02 17:27 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 17:27 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 13:12 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:12 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 13:52 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 13:52 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 17:42 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 17:42 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 13:17 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:17 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] sched: Introduce restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit task CPU affinity Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 9:49 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2020-11-27 9:49 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-27 13:19 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:19 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 13:06 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 13:06 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 10:01 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-27 10:01 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-27 13:23 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:23 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 16:55 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 16:55 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 14:07 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 14:07 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 13:32 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:32 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-30 17:05 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-30 17:05 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-30 17:36 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-30 17:36 ` Quentin Perret
2020-12-01 11:58 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 11:58 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 12:37 ` Quentin Perret
2020-12-01 12:37 ` Quentin Perret
2020-12-01 14:11 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 14:11 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 15:56 ` Quentin Perret
2020-12-01 15:56 ` Quentin Perret
2020-12-01 22:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 22:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 11:34 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 11:34 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 11:33 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 11:33 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] sched: Introduce arch_task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on arch_task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 9:54 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-27 9:54 ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 13:41 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:41 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-01 22:13 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 22:13 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 12:59 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 12:59 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 17:42 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 17:42 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02 18:08 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 18:08 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] arm64: Implement arch_task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 13:41 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:41 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2020-11-24 15:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Qais Yousef
2020-11-27 13:58 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-05 20:43 ` Pavel Machek
2020-12-05 20:43 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201127094940.GA906877@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.