Re: [PATCH] virtfs-proxy-helper: Fix a resource leak in main()

[Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>]

On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:44:24 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:

[...]
> > The only justification that'd deserve to be in the changelog of
> > such a patch is something like "because this is good practice
> > to rollback in case code moves to another function than main()".
> 
> Well, the actual motivation was rather a pragmatic one: to shut up a 
> sanitizer's false positive, which I can understand.
> 

Yes, this should also be mentioned in the changelog.

> Another option would be using a global variable for the fd instead of a 
> temporary on stack. That should shut up the sanitizer as well and would not 
> introduce change to the program flow.
> 

Using the same sock variable for an fd that is either passed to us
or that we create is a very poor programming choice actually... :(

So if the motivation is just to make "Euler Robot" happy and this
can be addressed as you suggest, I personally prefer that rather
than piling up fixes on broken code.

> I leave that up to Greg to decide whether or not to handle this. I'm 
> Switzerland on this one.
> 

This won't go into QEMU 5.2 anyway since we only merge fixes for
critical bugs or regressions at this point. No hurry to decide
anything now :)

> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
> 
>