From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, wei.huang2@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:00:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130140018.GC6019@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125144847.3920-4-punitagrawal@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:48:46PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> So far, the AMD processor identifier (family, models, stepping) are
> referred to by raw values making it easy to make mistakes. It is also
> harder to read and maintain. Additionally, these values are also being
> used in subsystems outside the arch code where not everybody maybe be
> as familiar with the processor identifiers.
>
> As a first step towards improving the status quo, add macros for the
> AMD processor families and propagate them through the existing
> cpu_device_id.h header used for this purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dff4d13b8e74
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_AMD_FAMILY_H
> +#define _ASM_X86_AMD_FAMILY_H
> +
> +#define AMD_FAM_K5 0x04
> +#define AMD_FAM_K6 0x05
> +#define AMD_FAM_K7 0x06
> +#define AMD_FAM_K8 0x0F
> +#define AMD_FAM_K10 0x10
Fam 0x10 is Greyhound and a lot more core names. I'd let the AMD folks
on Cc say what they wanna call it but I don't think K10 was used
anywhere except outside of AMD. :)
> +#define AMD_FAM_K8_K10_HYBRID 0x11
That was called Griffin so AMD_FAM_GRIFFIN I guess. If not used anywhere
in the tree, no need to add the define. Same holds true for the rest of
the defines - add them only when they're used.
> +#define AMD_FAM_LLANO 0x12
> +#define AMD_FAM_BOBCAT 0x14
> +#define AMD_FAM_BULLDOZER 0x15
> +#define AMD_FAM_JAGUAR 0x16
> +#define AMD_FAM_ZEN 0x17
ZEN2 is also 0x17 but different models so this is where the family
matching scheme doesn't work - you'd need the models too.
0x18 is HYGON
> +#define AMD_FAM_ZEN3 0x19
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_X86_AMD_FAMILY_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
> index eb8fcede9e3b..bbb48ba4c7ff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> /* Get the INTEL_FAM* model defines */
> #include <asm/intel-family.h>
> +/* Get the AMD model defines */
> +#include <asm/amd-family.h>
> /* And the X86_VENDOR_* ones */
> #include <asm/processor.h>
>
> --
> 2.29.2
>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 14:48 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Re-factor overriding ACPI PSD Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 19:29 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:31 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 20:20 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 20:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-07 22:07 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 22:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-08 3:44 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:21 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-08 23:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-11 23:36 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 12:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-14 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 14:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-17 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:00 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-12-02 14:13 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-02 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use identifiers for AMD processor family Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-02 14:30 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-04 22:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 23:25 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130140018.GC6019@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.