From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Wei Huang <whuang2@amd.com>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, wei.huang2@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 21:26:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201207202610.GG20489@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cadb5d57-5aaf-79bc-e30e-502d5e522689@amd.com>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:20:55PM -0600, Wei Huang wrote:
> In summary, this patch is fine if Punit already verified it. My only
> concern is the list can potentially increase over the time, and we will
> keep coming back to fix override_acpi_psd() function.
Can the detection be done by looking at those _PSD things instead of
comparing f/m/s?
And, alternatively, what is this fixing?
So what if some zen2 boxes have correct _PSD objects? Why do they need
to ignore the override?
Hmmm?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 14:48 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Re-factor overriding ACPI PSD Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 19:29 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:31 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 20:20 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 20:26 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-12-07 22:07 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 22:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-08 3:44 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:21 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-08 23:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-11 23:36 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 12:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-14 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 14:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-17 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-02 14:13 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-02 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use identifiers for AMD processor family Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-02 14:30 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-04 22:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 23:25 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201207202610.GG20489@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=whuang2@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.