All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: linux-nfc@lists.01.org
Subject: [linux-nfc] Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/4] nfc: s3fwrn5: extract the common phy blocks
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:42:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130184230.GC28735@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1606737829-29586-1-git-send-email-bongsu.jeon@samsung.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1365 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020@09:03:49PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
> 
> Extract the common phy blocks to reuse it.
> The UART module will use the common blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
> ---
>  Changes in v3:
>    - move the phy_common object to s3fwrn.ko to avoid duplication.
>    - include the header files to include everything which is used inside.
>    - wrap the lines.
> 
>  Changes in v2:
>    - remove the common function's definition in common header file.
>    - make the common phy_common.c file to define the common function.
>    - wrap the lines.
>    - change the Header guard.
>    - remove the unused common function.
> 
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/Makefile     |   2 +-
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/i2c.c        | 117 +++++++++++++--------------------------
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.c |  63 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.h |  36 ++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.h

I am sorry, but I am not going to review this. Please send properly a
next version - v4 of entire patchset - while fixing issues pointed out
in my other email (so use proper workflow).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: linux-nfc@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/4] nfc: s3fwrn5: extract the common phy blocks
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:42:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130184230.GC28735@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1606737829-29586-1-git-send-email-bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1368 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:03:49PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
> 
> Extract the common phy blocks to reuse it.
> The UART module will use the common blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
> ---
>  Changes in v3:
>    - move the phy_common object to s3fwrn.ko to avoid duplication.
>    - include the header files to include everything which is used inside.
>    - wrap the lines.
> 
>  Changes in v2:
>    - remove the common function's definition in common header file.
>    - make the common phy_common.c file to define the common function.
>    - wrap the lines.
>    - change the Header guard.
>    - remove the unused common function.
> 
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/Makefile     |   2 +-
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/i2c.c        | 117 +++++++++++++--------------------------
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.c |  63 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.h |  36 ++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.h

I am sorry, but I am not going to review this. Please send properly a
next version - v4 of entire patchset - while fixing issues pointed out
in my other email (so use proper workflow).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon2@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/4] nfc: s3fwrn5: extract the common phy blocks
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:42:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130184230.GC28735@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1606737829-29586-1-git-send-email-bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:03:49PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
> 
> Extract the common phy blocks to reuse it.
> The UART module will use the common blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
> ---
>  Changes in v3:
>    - move the phy_common object to s3fwrn.ko to avoid duplication.
>    - include the header files to include everything which is used inside.
>    - wrap the lines.
> 
>  Changes in v2:
>    - remove the common function's definition in common header file.
>    - make the common phy_common.c file to define the common function.
>    - wrap the lines.
>    - change the Header guard.
>    - remove the unused common function.
> 
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/Makefile     |   2 +-
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/i2c.c        | 117 +++++++++++++--------------------------
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.c |  63 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.h |  36 ++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/phy_common.h

I am sorry, but I am not going to review this. Please send properly a
next version - v4 of entire patchset - while fixing issues pointed out
in my other email (so use proper workflow).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

             reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 18:42 Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2020-11-30 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 3/4] nfc: s3fwrn5: extract the common phy blocks Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-11-30 18:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-30 12:03 [linux-nfc] " Bongsu Jeon
2020-11-30 12:03 ` Bongsu Jeon
2020-11-30 12:03 ` Bongsu Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201130184230.GC28735@kozik-lap \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfc@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.