All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: VSOL V2801F / CarlitoxxPro CPGOS03-0490 v2.0 workaround
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:11:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202131158.GK1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125140020.GJ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1231 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 02:00:20PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:18:56AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >    drivers/net/phy/sfp.c: In function 'sfp_i2c_read':
> > >> drivers/net/phy/sfp.c:339:9: warning: variable 'block_size' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >      339 |  size_t block_size;
> >          |         ^~~~~~~~~~
> 
> I'm waiting for Thomas to re-test the fixed patch I sent, but Thomas
> seems to be of the opinion that there's no need to re-test, despite
> the fixed patch having the intended effect of changing the behaviour
> on the I2C bus.
> 
> If nothing is forthcoming, I'm intending to drop the patch; we don't
> need to waste time supporting untested workarounds for what are
> essentially broken SFPs by vendors twisting the SFP MSA in the
> kernel.

I have had no further co-operation from Thomas so far. If I don't hear
from someone who is able to test this module by this weekend, I will be
dropping this patch from my repository.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Thomas Schreiber <tschreibe@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: VSOL V2801F / CarlitoxxPro CPGOS03-0490 v2.0 workaround
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:11:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202131158.GK1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125140020.GJ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 02:00:20PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:18:56AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >    drivers/net/phy/sfp.c: In function 'sfp_i2c_read':
> > >> drivers/net/phy/sfp.c:339:9: warning: variable 'block_size' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >      339 |  size_t block_size;
> >          |         ^~~~~~~~~~
> 
> I'm waiting for Thomas to re-test the fixed patch I sent, but Thomas
> seems to be of the opinion that there's no need to re-test, despite
> the fixed patch having the intended effect of changing the behaviour
> on the I2C bus.
> 
> If nothing is forthcoming, I'm intending to drop the patch; we don't
> need to waste time supporting untested workarounds for what are
> essentially broken SFPs by vendors twisting the SFP MSA in the
> kernel.

I have had no further co-operation from Thomas so far. If I don't hear
from someone who is able to test this module by this weekend, I will be
dropping this patch from my repository.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-23 21:53 [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: VSOL V2801F / CarlitoxxPro CPGOS03-0490 v2.0 workaround Russell King
2020-11-24  0:18 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-24  0:18   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 14:00   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-25 14:00     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-12-02 13:11     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-12-02 13:11       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-11-24  0:20 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-24  9:43   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201202131158.GK1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.