* How to have a 'bpf.sig_enforce' command line arg in kernel/bpf/syscall.c ?
@ 2020-12-02 14:12 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2020-12-02 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Masahiro Yamada; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
If I use:
module_param_named(bpf.sig_enforce, sig_enforce, bool_enable_only, 0644);
It explodes and if I do as before:
module_param(sig_enforce, sig_enforce, bool_enable_only, 0644);
Then it ends up as 'syscall.sig_enforce'.
The closest I got so far was:
commit aeacb019b61c4ea7689085574bd03d2c0810f119
Author: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date: Mon Mar 19 18:01:24 2018 +0900
kbuild: define KBUILD_MODNAME even if multiple modules share objects
Is there some way to set that modname var to 'bpf' in
kernel/bpf/syscall.c?
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-12-02 14:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-02 14:12 How to have a 'bpf.sig_enforce' command line arg in kernel/bpf/syscall.c ? Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.