All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into original patch
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:58:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209075849.GD2767@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13d04c4cc769ebd1dd58470f4d22ada5c9cd28e7.camel@perches.com>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:01:49PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 16:34 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > If not "Adjusted-by", what about "Tweaked-by", "Helped-by",
> > "Corrected-by"?
> 
> Improved-by: / Enhanced-by: / Revisions-by: 
> 

I don't think we should give any credit for improvements or enhancements,
only for fixes.  Complaining about style is its own reward.

Having to redo a patch is already a huge headache.  Normally, I already
considered the reviewer's prefered style and decided I didn't like it.
Then to make me redo the patch in an ugly style and say thankyou on
top of that???  Forget about it.  Plus, as a reviewer I hate reviewing
patches over and over.

I've argued for years that we should have a Fixes-from: tag.  The zero
day bot is already encouraging people to add Reported-by tags for this
and a lot of people do.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
Ksummit-discuss mailing list
Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into original patch
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:58:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209075849.GD2767@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13d04c4cc769ebd1dd58470f4d22ada5c9cd28e7.camel@perches.com>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:01:49PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 16:34 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > If not "Adjusted-by", what about "Tweaked-by", "Helped-by",
> > "Corrected-by"?
> 
> Improved-by: / Enhanced-by: / Revisions-by: 
> 

I don't think we should give any credit for improvements or enhancements,
only for fixes.  Complaining about style is its own reward.

Having to redo a patch is already a huge headache.  Normally, I already
considered the reviewer's prefered style and decided I didn't like it.
Then to make me redo the patch in an ugly style and say thankyou on
top of that???  Forget about it.  Plus, as a reviewer I hate reviewing
patches over and over.

I've argued for years that we should have a Fixes-from: tag.  The zero
day bot is already encouraging people to add Reported-by tags for this
and a lot of people do.

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-02 23:43 [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into original patch Vlastimil Babka
2020-12-02 23:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-12-03  4:02 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-12-03  4:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-12-03  9:34   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-03  9:34     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-03  9:36     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-03  9:36       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-03 10:40       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-03 10:40         ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-03 18:30         ` Greg KH
2020-12-03 18:30           ` Greg KH
2020-12-03 19:04           ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-03 19:04             ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-12-09  0:34           ` Kees Cook
2020-12-09  0:34             ` Kees Cook
2020-12-09  5:01             ` Joe Perches
2020-12-09  5:01               ` Joe Perches
2020-12-09  7:58               ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-12-09  7:58                 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-12-09  8:45                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-12-09  8:45                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-12-09  9:18                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-09  9:18                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-09  8:54                 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-09  8:54                   ` Joe Perches
2020-12-09 10:30                   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-12-09 10:30                     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-12-09 17:45                     ` Dan Williams
2020-12-09 17:45                       ` Dan Williams
2020-12-03 10:33 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-12-03 10:33   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-12-03 13:41   ` Julia Lawall
2020-12-03 13:41     ` Julia Lawall
2020-12-03 13:58 ` James Bottomley
2020-12-03 13:58   ` James Bottomley
2020-12-03 16:55   ` Joe Perches
2020-12-03 16:55     ` Joe Perches
2020-12-03 19:17     ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-12-03 19:17       ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-12-03 19:24       ` Joe Perches
2020-12-03 19:24         ` Joe Perches
2020-12-03 21:13       ` James Bottomley
2020-12-03 21:13         ` James Bottomley
2020-12-03 18:52   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-12-03 20:04     ` James Bottomley
2020-12-03 20:04       ` James Bottomley
2020-12-04  4:54 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-12-04  4:54   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201209075849.GD2767@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.