From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: YouChing Lin <ycllin@mxic.com.tw>
Cc: juliensu@mxic.com.tw, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
vigneshr@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Fix the size of calc_buf/code_buf of the BCH
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:33:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201210223333.204062b1@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1607570529-22341-2-git-send-email-ycllin@mxic.com.tw>
Hi YouChing,
YouChing Lin <ycllin@mxic.com.tw> wrote on Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:22:08
+0800:
> If eccbyte exceeds 64 bytes, the read operation will get wrong results.
> For example: Flash with a page size of 4096 bytes (eccbyte: 104 bytes).
> During the read operation, after executing nand_ecc_sw_bch_calculate(),
> since the calc_buf/code_buf ranges overlap each other, the last three
> steps of ecc_code (read from oob) will be changed.
>
> The root cause is that the size of calc_buf/code_buf is limited to 64
> bytes, although sizeof(mtd->oobsize) returns 4, kzalloc() will allocate
> 64 bytes (cache size alignment).
>
> So we correct the size of calc_buf/code_buf to mtd->oobsize.
>
> Signed-off-by: YouChing Lin <ycllin@mxic.com.tw>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c
> index 4d8a979..0a0ac11 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c
> @@ -237,8 +237,8 @@ int nand_ecc_sw_bch_init_ctx(struct nand_device *nand)
>
> engine_conf->code_size = code_size;
> engine_conf->nsteps = nsteps;
> - engine_conf->calc_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(mtd->oobsize), GFP_KERNEL);
> - engine_conf->code_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(mtd->oobsize), GFP_KERNEL);
> + engine_conf->calc_buf = kzalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
> + engine_conf->code_buf = kzalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
Very nice catch! If you don't mind I will merge this fix with the
faulty commit (still in next) and I will also bring the fix to Hamming
which will suffer from the same error.
Then I will apply the second patch.
> if (!engine_conf->calc_buf || !engine_conf->code_buf) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto free_bufs;
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: YouChing Lin <ycllin@mxic.com.tw>
Cc: vigneshr@ti.com, juliensu@mxic.com.tw,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Fix the size of calc_buf/code_buf of the BCH
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:33:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201210223333.204062b1@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1607570529-22341-2-git-send-email-ycllin@mxic.com.tw>
Hi YouChing,
YouChing Lin <ycllin@mxic.com.tw> wrote on Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:22:08
+0800:
> If eccbyte exceeds 64 bytes, the read operation will get wrong results.
> For example: Flash with a page size of 4096 bytes (eccbyte: 104 bytes).
> During the read operation, after executing nand_ecc_sw_bch_calculate(),
> since the calc_buf/code_buf ranges overlap each other, the last three
> steps of ecc_code (read from oob) will be changed.
>
> The root cause is that the size of calc_buf/code_buf is limited to 64
> bytes, although sizeof(mtd->oobsize) returns 4, kzalloc() will allocate
> 64 bytes (cache size alignment).
>
> So we correct the size of calc_buf/code_buf to mtd->oobsize.
>
> Signed-off-by: YouChing Lin <ycllin@mxic.com.tw>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c
> index 4d8a979..0a0ac11 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-sw-bch.c
> @@ -237,8 +237,8 @@ int nand_ecc_sw_bch_init_ctx(struct nand_device *nand)
>
> engine_conf->code_size = code_size;
> engine_conf->nsteps = nsteps;
> - engine_conf->calc_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(mtd->oobsize), GFP_KERNEL);
> - engine_conf->code_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(mtd->oobsize), GFP_KERNEL);
> + engine_conf->calc_buf = kzalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
> + engine_conf->code_buf = kzalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
Very nice catch! If you don't mind I will merge this fix with the
faulty commit (still in next) and I will also bring the fix to Hamming
which will suffer from the same error.
Then I will apply the second patch.
> if (!engine_conf->calc_buf || !engine_conf->code_buf) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto free_bufs;
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-10 3:22 [PATCH 0/2] mtd: spinand: add support for MX35LFxG24AD & Fix bug of BCH YouChing Lin
2020-12-10 3:22 ` YouChing Lin
2020-12-10 3:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Fix the size of calc_buf/code_buf of the BCH YouChing Lin
2020-12-10 3:22 ` YouChing Lin
2020-12-10 21:33 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-12-10 21:33 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-12-11 1:20 ` ycllin
2020-12-11 1:20 ` ycllin
2020-12-10 3:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: spinand: macronix: Add support for MX35LFxG24AD YouChing Lin
2020-12-10 3:22 ` YouChing Lin
2020-12-10 21:38 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-12-10 21:38 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201210223333.204062b1@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=ycllin@mxic.com.tw \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.