From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] iio:common:ms_sensors:ms_sensors_i2c: add support for alternative PROM layout
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:34:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201213193436.GM1781038@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201213172042.76b2e028@archlinux>
On 13/12/2020 17:20:42+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_112() - CRC check function for
> > + * Temperature and pressure devices for 112bit PROM.
> > + * This function is only used when reading PROM coefficients
> > + *
> > + * @prom: pointer to PROM coefficients array
> > + *
> > + * Return: CRC.
>
> That's a bit confusing. Perhaps return if CRC correct
> Sometimes CRC is used to refer to particular bits and sometimes
> to the check (i.e. whether it is right).
>
Roght, this should have been "Return: True if CRC is ok."
> > + */
> > +static bool ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_112(u16 *prom)
> > +{
> > + u16 w0 = prom[0], crc_read = (w0 & 0xF000) >> 12;
> > + u8 crc;
> > +
> > + prom[0] &= 0x0FFF; /* Clear the CRC computation part */
> > + prom[MS_SENSORS_TP_PROM_WORDS_NB - 1] = 0;
> > +
> > + crc = ms_sensors_tp_crc4(prom);
> > +
> > + prom[0] = w0;
> > +
> > + return crc == crc_read;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_128() - CRC check function for
> > + * Temperature and pressure devices for 128bit PROM.
> > + * This function is only used when reading PROM coefficients
> > + *
> > + * @prom: pointer to PROM coefficients array
> > + *
> > + * Return: CRC.
> > + */
> > +static bool ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_128(u16 *prom)
> > +{
> > + u16 w7 = prom[7], crc_read = w7 & 0x000F;
> > + u8 crc;
> > +
> > + prom[7] &= 0xFF00; /* Clear the CRC and LSB part */
> > +
> > + crc = ms_sensors_tp_crc4(prom);
> > +
> > + prom[7] = w7;
> > +
> > + return crc == crc_read;
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -535,6 +577,7 @@ static bool ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid(u16 *prom)
> > int ms_sensors_tp_read_prom(struct ms_tp_dev *dev_data)
> > {
> > int i, ret;
> > + bool valid;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < dev_data->hw->prom_len; i++) {
> > ret = ms_sensors_read_prom_word(
> > @@ -546,7 +589,12 @@ int ms_sensors_tp_read_prom(struct ms_tp_dev *dev_data)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid(dev_data->prom)) {
> > + if (dev_data->hw->prom_len == 8)
> > + valid = ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_128(dev_data->prom);
> > + else
> > + valid = ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_112(dev_data->prom);
> > +
> > + if (!valid) {
> > dev_err(&dev_data->client->dev,
> > "Calibration coefficients crc check error\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] iio:common:ms_sensors:ms_sensors_i2c: add support for alternative PROM layout
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:34:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201213193436.GM1781038@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201213172042.76b2e028@archlinux>
On 13/12/2020 17:20:42+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_112() - CRC check function for
> > + * Temperature and pressure devices for 112bit PROM.
> > + * This function is only used when reading PROM coefficients
> > + *
> > + * @prom: pointer to PROM coefficients array
> > + *
> > + * Return: CRC.
>
> That's a bit confusing. Perhaps return if CRC correct
> Sometimes CRC is used to refer to particular bits and sometimes
> to the check (i.e. whether it is right).
>
Roght, this should have been "Return: True if CRC is ok."
> > + */
> > +static bool ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_112(u16 *prom)
> > +{
> > + u16 w0 = prom[0], crc_read = (w0 & 0xF000) >> 12;
> > + u8 crc;
> > +
> > + prom[0] &= 0x0FFF; /* Clear the CRC computation part */
> > + prom[MS_SENSORS_TP_PROM_WORDS_NB - 1] = 0;
> > +
> > + crc = ms_sensors_tp_crc4(prom);
> > +
> > + prom[0] = w0;
> > +
> > + return crc == crc_read;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_128() - CRC check function for
> > + * Temperature and pressure devices for 128bit PROM.
> > + * This function is only used when reading PROM coefficients
> > + *
> > + * @prom: pointer to PROM coefficients array
> > + *
> > + * Return: CRC.
> > + */
> > +static bool ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_128(u16 *prom)
> > +{
> > + u16 w7 = prom[7], crc_read = w7 & 0x000F;
> > + u8 crc;
> > +
> > + prom[7] &= 0xFF00; /* Clear the CRC and LSB part */
> > +
> > + crc = ms_sensors_tp_crc4(prom);
> > +
> > + prom[7] = w7;
> > +
> > + return crc == crc_read;
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -535,6 +577,7 @@ static bool ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid(u16 *prom)
> > int ms_sensors_tp_read_prom(struct ms_tp_dev *dev_data)
> > {
> > int i, ret;
> > + bool valid;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < dev_data->hw->prom_len; i++) {
> > ret = ms_sensors_read_prom_word(
> > @@ -546,7 +589,12 @@ int ms_sensors_tp_read_prom(struct ms_tp_dev *dev_data)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid(dev_data->prom)) {
> > + if (dev_data->hw->prom_len == 8)
> > + valid = ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_128(dev_data->prom);
> > + else
> > + valid = ms_sensors_tp_crc_valid_112(dev_data->prom);
> > +
> > + if (!valid) {
> > dev_err(&dev_data->client->dev,
> > "Calibration coefficients crc check error\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-13 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 23:48 [PATCH 0/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: add ms5803 support Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: switch to probe_new Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-12 13:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-12 13:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-13 17:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 17:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: introduce hardware differentiation Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-13 17:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 17:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 19:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-13 19:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: limit available sample frequencies Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-12 18:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-12 18:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-13 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] iio:common:ms_sensors:ms_sensors_i2c: rework CRC calculation helper Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] iio:common:ms_sensors:ms_sensors_i2c: add support for alternative PROM layout Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-13 17:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 17:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-13 19:34 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2020-12-13 19:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: add ms5803 support Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-09 23:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-11 3:34 ` Rob Herring
2020-12-11 3:34 ` Rob Herring
2020-12-11 8:08 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-11 8:08 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201213193436.GM1781038@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.