All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>,
	Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix handling of zero-sized Read and Receive Queues.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 07:36:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216053631.GP5005@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201215201918.4050-1-bmt@zurich.ibm.com>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:19:18PM +0100, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> During connection setup, the application may choose to zero-size
> inbound and outbound READ queues, as well as the Receive queue.
> This patch fixes handling of zero-sized queues, but not prevents
> it.
>
> v2 changes:
> - Fix uninitialized variable introduced in siw_qp_rx.c, as
>   Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> - Add initial error report as
>   Reported-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>

Changelog shouldn't be in the commit message and needs to appear after "---",
because only this version will be applied to the kernel.

>
> Kamal Heib says in an initial error report:
> When running the blktests over siw the following shift-out-of-bounds is
> reported, this is happening because the passed IRD or ORD from the ulp
> could be zero which will lead to unexpected behavior when calling
> roundup_pow_of_two(), fix that by blocking zero values of ORD or IRD.
>
> UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13
> shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
> CPU: 20 PID: 3957 Comm: kworker/u64:13 Tainted: G S     5.10.0-rc6 #2
> Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R630/02C2CP, BIOS 2.1.5 04/11/2016
> Workqueue: iw_cm_wq cm_work_handler [iw_cm]
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack+0x99/0xcb
>  ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
>  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold.11+0xb4/0xf3
>  ? down_write+0x183/0x3d0
>  siw_qp_modify.cold.8+0x2d/0x32 [siw]
>  ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0
>  siw_accept+0x906/0x1b60 [siw]
>  ? xa_load+0x147/0x1f0
>  ? siw_connect+0x17a0/0x17a0 [siw]
>  ? lock_downgrade+0x700/0x700
>  ? siw_get_base_qp+0x1c2/0x340 [siw]
>  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
>  iw_cm_accept+0x1f4/0x430 [iw_cm]
>  rdma_accept+0x3fa/0xb10 [rdma_cm]
>  ? check_flush_dependency+0x410/0x410
>  ? cma_rep_recv+0x570/0x570 [rdma_cm]
>  nvmet_rdma_queue_connect+0x1a62/0x2680 [nvmet_rdma]
>  ? nvmet_rdma_alloc_cmds+0xce0/0xce0 [nvmet_rdma]
>  ? lock_release+0x56e/0xcc0
>  ? lock_downgrade+0x700/0x700
>  ? lock_downgrade+0x700/0x700
>  ? __xa_alloc_cyclic+0xef/0x350
>  ? __xa_alloc+0x2d0/0x2d0
>  ? rdma_restrack_add+0xbe/0x2c0 [ib_core]
>  ? __ww_mutex_die+0x190/0x190
>  cma_cm_event_handler+0xf2/0x500 [rdma_cm]
>  iw_conn_req_handler+0x910/0xcb0 [rdma_cm]
>  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
>  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x150
>  ? cma_ib_handler+0x8a0/0x8a0 [rdma_cm]
>  ? __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.7+0xc1/0xd0
>  cm_work_handler+0x121c/0x17a0 [iw_cm]
>  ? iw_cm_reject+0x190/0x190 [iw_cm]
>  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x150
>  process_one_work+0x8fb/0x16c0
>  ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320
>  worker_thread+0x87/0xb40
>  ? __kthread_parkme+0xd1/0x1a0
>  ? process_one_work+0x16c0/0x16c0
>  kthread+0x35f/0x430
>  ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0x180/0x180
>  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>
> Fixes: a531975279f3 ("rdma/siw: main include file")
> Fixes: f29dd55b0236 ("rdma/siw: queue pair methods")
> Fixes: 8b6a361b8c48 ("rdma/siw: receive path")
> Fixes: b9be6f18cf9e ("rdma/siw: transmit path")
> Fixes: 303ae1cdfdf7 ("rdma/siw: application interface")
> Reported-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h       |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c    | 54 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c | 26 +++++++++----
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c |  4 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 18 +++++++--
>  5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> index e9753831ac3f..6f17392f975a 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static inline struct siw_sqe *orq_get_free(struct siw_qp *qp)
>  {
>  	struct siw_sqe *orq_e = orq_get_tail(qp);
>
> -	if (orq_e && READ_ONCE(orq_e->flags) == 0)
> +	if (READ_ONCE(orq_e->flags) == 0)
>  		return orq_e;
>
>  	return NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c
> index 875d36d4b1c6..b686a09a75ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c
> @@ -199,26 +199,28 @@ void siw_qp_llp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
>
>  static int siw_qp_readq_init(struct siw_qp *qp, int irq_size, int orq_size)
>  {
> -	irq_size = roundup_pow_of_two(irq_size);
> -	orq_size = roundup_pow_of_two(orq_size);
> -
> -	qp->attrs.irq_size = irq_size;
> -	qp->attrs.orq_size = orq_size;
> -
> -	qp->irq = vzalloc(irq_size * sizeof(struct siw_sqe));
> -	if (!qp->irq) {
> -		siw_dbg_qp(qp, "irq malloc for %d failed\n", irq_size);
> -		qp->attrs.irq_size = 0;
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (irq_size) {
> +		irq_size = roundup_pow_of_two(irq_size);
> +		qp->irq = vzalloc(irq_size * sizeof(struct siw_sqe));
> +		if (!qp->irq) {
> +			siw_dbg_qp(qp, "irq malloc for %d failed\n", irq_size);

Please don't copy the prints.

Thanks

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
	Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, jgg@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix handling of zero-sized Read and Receive Queues.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 07:36:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216053631.GP5005@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201215201918.4050-1-bmt@zurich.ibm.com>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:19:18PM +0100, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> During connection setup, the application may choose to zero-size
> inbound and outbound READ queues, as well as the Receive queue.
> This patch fixes handling of zero-sized queues, but not prevents
> it.
>
> v2 changes:
> - Fix uninitialized variable introduced in siw_qp_rx.c, as
>   Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> - Add initial error report as
>   Reported-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>

Changelog shouldn't be in the commit message and needs to appear after "---",
because only this version will be applied to the kernel.

>
> Kamal Heib says in an initial error report:
> When running the blktests over siw the following shift-out-of-bounds is
> reported, this is happening because the passed IRD or ORD from the ulp
> could be zero which will lead to unexpected behavior when calling
> roundup_pow_of_two(), fix that by blocking zero values of ORD or IRD.
>
> UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13
> shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
> CPU: 20 PID: 3957 Comm: kworker/u64:13 Tainted: G S     5.10.0-rc6 #2
> Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R630/02C2CP, BIOS 2.1.5 04/11/2016
> Workqueue: iw_cm_wq cm_work_handler [iw_cm]
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack+0x99/0xcb
>  ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
>  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold.11+0xb4/0xf3
>  ? down_write+0x183/0x3d0
>  siw_qp_modify.cold.8+0x2d/0x32 [siw]
>  ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0
>  siw_accept+0x906/0x1b60 [siw]
>  ? xa_load+0x147/0x1f0
>  ? siw_connect+0x17a0/0x17a0 [siw]
>  ? lock_downgrade+0x700/0x700
>  ? siw_get_base_qp+0x1c2/0x340 [siw]
>  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
>  iw_cm_accept+0x1f4/0x430 [iw_cm]
>  rdma_accept+0x3fa/0xb10 [rdma_cm]
>  ? check_flush_dependency+0x410/0x410
>  ? cma_rep_recv+0x570/0x570 [rdma_cm]
>  nvmet_rdma_queue_connect+0x1a62/0x2680 [nvmet_rdma]
>  ? nvmet_rdma_alloc_cmds+0xce0/0xce0 [nvmet_rdma]
>  ? lock_release+0x56e/0xcc0
>  ? lock_downgrade+0x700/0x700
>  ? lock_downgrade+0x700/0x700
>  ? __xa_alloc_cyclic+0xef/0x350
>  ? __xa_alloc+0x2d0/0x2d0
>  ? rdma_restrack_add+0xbe/0x2c0 [ib_core]
>  ? __ww_mutex_die+0x190/0x190
>  cma_cm_event_handler+0xf2/0x500 [rdma_cm]
>  iw_conn_req_handler+0x910/0xcb0 [rdma_cm]
>  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
>  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x150
>  ? cma_ib_handler+0x8a0/0x8a0 [rdma_cm]
>  ? __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.7+0xc1/0xd0
>  cm_work_handler+0x121c/0x17a0 [iw_cm]
>  ? iw_cm_reject+0x190/0x190 [iw_cm]
>  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x150
>  process_one_work+0x8fb/0x16c0
>  ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320
>  worker_thread+0x87/0xb40
>  ? __kthread_parkme+0xd1/0x1a0
>  ? process_one_work+0x16c0/0x16c0
>  kthread+0x35f/0x430
>  ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0x180/0x180
>  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>
> Fixes: a531975279f3 ("rdma/siw: main include file")
> Fixes: f29dd55b0236 ("rdma/siw: queue pair methods")
> Fixes: 8b6a361b8c48 ("rdma/siw: receive path")
> Fixes: b9be6f18cf9e ("rdma/siw: transmit path")
> Fixes: 303ae1cdfdf7 ("rdma/siw: application interface")
> Reported-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h       |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c    | 54 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c | 26 +++++++++----
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c |  4 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 18 +++++++--
>  5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> index e9753831ac3f..6f17392f975a 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static inline struct siw_sqe *orq_get_free(struct siw_qp *qp)
>  {
>  	struct siw_sqe *orq_e = orq_get_tail(qp);
>
> -	if (orq_e && READ_ONCE(orq_e->flags) == 0)
> +	if (READ_ONCE(orq_e->flags) == 0)
>  		return orq_e;
>
>  	return NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c
> index 875d36d4b1c6..b686a09a75ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c
> @@ -199,26 +199,28 @@ void siw_qp_llp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
>
>  static int siw_qp_readq_init(struct siw_qp *qp, int irq_size, int orq_size)
>  {
> -	irq_size = roundup_pow_of_two(irq_size);
> -	orq_size = roundup_pow_of_two(orq_size);
> -
> -	qp->attrs.irq_size = irq_size;
> -	qp->attrs.orq_size = orq_size;
> -
> -	qp->irq = vzalloc(irq_size * sizeof(struct siw_sqe));
> -	if (!qp->irq) {
> -		siw_dbg_qp(qp, "irq malloc for %d failed\n", irq_size);
> -		qp->attrs.irq_size = 0;
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (irq_size) {
> +		irq_size = roundup_pow_of_two(irq_size);
> +		qp->irq = vzalloc(irq_size * sizeof(struct siw_sqe));
> +		if (!qp->irq) {
> +			siw_dbg_qp(qp, "irq malloc for %d failed\n", irq_size);

Please don't copy the prints.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-16  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-15 20:19 [PATCH v2] RDMA/siw: Fix handling of zero-sized Read and Receive Queues Bernard Metzler
2020-12-15 20:19 ` Bernard Metzler
2020-12-16  5:36 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-12-16  5:36   ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201216053631.GP5005@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmt@zurich.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kamalheib1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.