All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: yuzenghui@huawei.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	zhukeqian1@huawei.com, yezengruan@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Decouple partial code of hyp stage 1 mapping and guest stage 2 mapping
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:28:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216122844.25092-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216122844.25092-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com>

Procedures of hyp stage 1 mapping and guest stage 2 mapping are different,
but they are tied closely by function kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte().
So separate them by rewriting kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte().

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index bdf8e55ed308..350f9f810930 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -170,10 +170,9 @@ static void kvm_set_table_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, kvm_pte_t *childp)
 	smp_store_release(ptep, pte);
 }
 
-static bool kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr,
-				   u32 level)
+static kvm_pte_t kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr, u32 level)
 {
-	kvm_pte_t old = *ptep, pte = kvm_phys_to_pte(pa);
+	kvm_pte_t pte = kvm_phys_to_pte(pa);
 	u64 type = (level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1) ? KVM_PTE_TYPE_PAGE :
 							   KVM_PTE_TYPE_BLOCK;
 
@@ -181,12 +180,7 @@ static bool kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr,
 	pte |= FIELD_PREP(KVM_PTE_TYPE, type);
 	pte |= KVM_PTE_VALID;
 
-	/* Tolerate KVM recreating the exact same mapping. */
-	if (kvm_pte_valid(old))
-		return old == pte;
-
-	smp_store_release(ptep, pte);
-	return true;
+	return pte;
 }
 
 static int kvm_pgtable_visitor_cb(struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data *data, u64 addr,
@@ -341,12 +335,17 @@ static int hyp_map_set_prot_attr(enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot,
 static bool hyp_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
 				    kvm_pte_t *ptep, struct hyp_map_data *data)
 {
+	kvm_pte_t new, old = *ptep;
 	u64 granule = kvm_granule_size(level), phys = data->phys;
 
 	if (!kvm_block_mapping_supported(addr, end, phys, level))
 		return false;
 
-	WARN_ON(!kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level));
+	/* Tolerate KVM recreating the exact same mapping */
+	new = kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(phys, data->attr, level);
+	if (old != new && !WARN_ON(kvm_pte_valid(old)))
+		smp_store_release(ptep, new);
+
 	data->phys += granule;
 	return true;
 }
@@ -465,27 +464,29 @@ static bool stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
 				       kvm_pte_t *ptep,
 				       struct stage2_map_data *data)
 {
+	kvm_pte_t new, old = *ptep;
 	u64 granule = kvm_granule_size(level), phys = data->phys;
+	struct page *page = virt_to_page(ptep);
 
 	if (!kvm_block_mapping_supported(addr, end, phys, level))
 		return false;
 
-	/*
-	 * If the PTE was already valid, drop the refcount on the table
-	 * early, as it will be bumped-up again in stage2_map_walk_leaf().
-	 * This ensures that the refcount stays constant across a valid to
-	 * valid PTE update.
-	 */
-	if (kvm_pte_valid(*ptep))
-		put_page(virt_to_page(ptep));
+	new = kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(phys, data->attr, level);
+	if (kvm_pte_valid(old)) {
+		/* Tolerate KVM recreating the exact same mapping */
+		if (old == new)
+			goto out;
 
-	if (kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level))
-		goto out;
+		/* There's an existing different valid leaf entry, so perform
+		 * break-before-make.
+		 */
+		kvm_set_invalid_pte(ptep);
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, data->mmu, addr, level);
+		put_page(page);
+	}
 
-	/* There's an existing valid leaf entry, so perform break-before-make */
-	kvm_set_invalid_pte(ptep);
-	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, data->mmu, addr, level);
-	kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level);
+	smp_store_release(ptep, new);
+	get_page(page);
 out:
 	data->phys += granule;
 	return true;
@@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
 	}
 
 	if (stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(addr, end, level, ptep, data))
-		goto out_get_page;
+		return 0;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -551,9 +552,8 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
 	}
 
 	kvm_set_table_pte(ptep, childp);
-
-out_get_page:
 	get_page(page);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>, <yezengruan@huawei.com>,
	<zhukeqian1@huawei.com>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Decouple partial code of hyp stage 1 mapping and guest stage 2 mapping
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:28:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216122844.25092-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216122844.25092-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com>

Procedures of hyp stage 1 mapping and guest stage 2 mapping are different,
but they are tied closely by function kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte().
So separate them by rewriting kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte().

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index bdf8e55ed308..350f9f810930 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -170,10 +170,9 @@ static void kvm_set_table_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, kvm_pte_t *childp)
 	smp_store_release(ptep, pte);
 }
 
-static bool kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr,
-				   u32 level)
+static kvm_pte_t kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr, u32 level)
 {
-	kvm_pte_t old = *ptep, pte = kvm_phys_to_pte(pa);
+	kvm_pte_t pte = kvm_phys_to_pte(pa);
 	u64 type = (level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1) ? KVM_PTE_TYPE_PAGE :
 							   KVM_PTE_TYPE_BLOCK;
 
@@ -181,12 +180,7 @@ static bool kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr,
 	pte |= FIELD_PREP(KVM_PTE_TYPE, type);
 	pte |= KVM_PTE_VALID;
 
-	/* Tolerate KVM recreating the exact same mapping. */
-	if (kvm_pte_valid(old))
-		return old == pte;
-
-	smp_store_release(ptep, pte);
-	return true;
+	return pte;
 }
 
 static int kvm_pgtable_visitor_cb(struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data *data, u64 addr,
@@ -341,12 +335,17 @@ static int hyp_map_set_prot_attr(enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot,
 static bool hyp_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
 				    kvm_pte_t *ptep, struct hyp_map_data *data)
 {
+	kvm_pte_t new, old = *ptep;
 	u64 granule = kvm_granule_size(level), phys = data->phys;
 
 	if (!kvm_block_mapping_supported(addr, end, phys, level))
 		return false;
 
-	WARN_ON(!kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level));
+	/* Tolerate KVM recreating the exact same mapping */
+	new = kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(phys, data->attr, level);
+	if (old != new && !WARN_ON(kvm_pte_valid(old)))
+		smp_store_release(ptep, new);
+
 	data->phys += granule;
 	return true;
 }
@@ -465,27 +464,29 @@ static bool stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
 				       kvm_pte_t *ptep,
 				       struct stage2_map_data *data)
 {
+	kvm_pte_t new, old = *ptep;
 	u64 granule = kvm_granule_size(level), phys = data->phys;
+	struct page *page = virt_to_page(ptep);
 
 	if (!kvm_block_mapping_supported(addr, end, phys, level))
 		return false;
 
-	/*
-	 * If the PTE was already valid, drop the refcount on the table
-	 * early, as it will be bumped-up again in stage2_map_walk_leaf().
-	 * This ensures that the refcount stays constant across a valid to
-	 * valid PTE update.
-	 */
-	if (kvm_pte_valid(*ptep))
-		put_page(virt_to_page(ptep));
+	new = kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(phys, data->attr, level);
+	if (kvm_pte_valid(old)) {
+		/* Tolerate KVM recreating the exact same mapping */
+		if (old == new)
+			goto out;
 
-	if (kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level))
-		goto out;
+		/* There's an existing different valid leaf entry, so perform
+		 * break-before-make.
+		 */
+		kvm_set_invalid_pte(ptep);
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, data->mmu, addr, level);
+		put_page(page);
+	}
 
-	/* There's an existing valid leaf entry, so perform break-before-make */
-	kvm_set_invalid_pte(ptep);
-	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, data->mmu, addr, level);
-	kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level);
+	smp_store_release(ptep, new);
+	get_page(page);
 out:
 	data->phys += granule;
 	return true;
@@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
 	}
 
 	if (stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(addr, end, level, ptep, data))
-		goto out_get_page;
+		return 0;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -551,9 +552,8 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
 	}
 
 	kvm_set_table_pte(ptep, childp);
-
-out_get_page:
 	get_page(page);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-16 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-16 12:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] RFC: Solve several problems in stage 2 translation Yanan Wang
2020-12-16 12:28 ` Yanan Wang
2020-12-16 12:28 ` Yanan Wang [this message]
2020-12-16 12:28   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Decouple partial code of hyp stage 1 mapping and guest stage 2 mapping Yanan Wang
2020-12-16 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: arm64: Add prejudgement for relaxing permissions only case in stage2 translation fault handler Yanan Wang
2020-12-16 12:28   ` Yanan Wang
2021-01-13 15:44   ` Will Deacon
2021-01-13 15:44     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-14  9:28     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-01-14  9:28       ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-16 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: arm64: Mark the page dirty only if the fault is handled successfully Yanan Wang
2020-12-16 12:28   ` Yanan Wang
2021-01-13 15:51   ` Will Deacon
2021-01-13 15:51     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-14  9:28     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-01-14  9:28       ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-28  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] RFC: Solve several problems in stage 2 translation wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-28  2:46   ` wangyanan (Y)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201216122844.25092-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yezengruan@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.