From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Vadym Kochan <vkochan@marvell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@marvell.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 09/10] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: remove transactional logic for VLAN objects
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 20:10:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106181030.GD1082997@shredder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210106131006.577312-10-olteanv@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 03:10:05PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> @@ -1764,29 +1759,20 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> {
> struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan;
> - struct switchdev_trans trans;
> int err = 0;
>
> switch (obj->id) {
> case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
> vlan = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj);
>
> - trans.ph_prepare = true;
> - err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, &trans,
> - extack);
> + err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, extack);
> if (err)
> break;
>
> - /* The event is emitted before the changes are actually
> - * applied to the bridge. Therefore schedule the respin
> - * call for later, so that the respin logic sees the
> + /* Schedule the respin call, so that the respin logic sees the
> * updated bridge state.
> */
I would keep this comment as-is. Other than that this patch looks good
to me:
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 13:09 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/10] Get rid of the switchdev transactional model Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 13:09 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/10] net: switchdev: remove vid_begin -> vid_end range from VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 14:12 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-06 14:12 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-06 17:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 17:08 ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-06 17:15 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 17:26 ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-06 13:09 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/10] net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 17:42 ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-06 13:09 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/10] net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 17:43 ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/10] net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port attributes Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 17:47 ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/10] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from ageing time notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/10] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from MDB entries Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/10] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/10] net: dsa: remove obsolete comments about switchdev transactions Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/10] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: remove transactional logic for VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 18:10 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2021-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/10] net: switchdev: delete the transaction object Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 18:11 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210106181030.GD1082997@shredder.lan \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=tchornyi@marvell.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=vkochan@marvell.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.