All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
	gmazyland@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash
Date: Thu,  7 Jan 2021 20:07:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108040708.8389-3-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108040708.8389-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

The original IMA buffer data measurement sizes were small (e.g.  boot
command line), but the new buffer data measurement use cases have data 
sizes that are a lot larger.  Just as IMA measures the file data hash,
not the file data, IMA should similarly support the option for measuring 
buffer data hash.

Introduce a boolean parameter to support measuring buffer data hash,
which would be much smaller, instead of the buffer itself.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h                 |  3 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c        |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c            | 29 ++++++++++++++++----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c      |  3 +-
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index e5622ce8cbb1..0b4634515839 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file,
 			   struct ima_template_desc *template_desc);
 void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-				int pcr, const char *func_data);
+				int pcr, const char *func_data,
+				bool buf_hash);
 void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 			   const unsigned char *filename);
 int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 8361941ee0a1..46ffa38bab12 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 		if ((rc == -EPERM) && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE))
 			process_buffer_measurement(NULL, digest, digestsize,
 						   "blacklisted-hash", NONE,
-						   pcr, NULL);
+						   pcr, NULL, false);
 	}
 
 	return rc;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
index 1c68c500c26f..a74095793936 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
@@ -60,5 +60,5 @@ void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key,
 	 */
 	process_buffer_measurement(NULL, payload, payload_len,
 				   keyring->description, KEY_CHECK, 0,
-				   keyring->description);
+				   keyring->description, false);
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index b4ed611cd2a4..494fb964497d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
 }
 
 /*
- * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer to ima log.
+ * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer or the buffer data hash
  * @inode: inode associated with the object being measured (NULL for KEY_CHECK)
  * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log.
  * @size: size of buffer(in bytes).
@@ -787,12 +787,14 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
  * @func: IMA hook
  * @pcr: pcr to extend the measurement
  * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL
+ * @buf_hash: measure buffer data hash
  *
- * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log.
+ * Based on policy, either the buffer data or buffer data hash is measured
  */
 void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-				int pcr, const char *func_data)
+				int pcr, const char *func_data,
+				bool buf_hash)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM";
@@ -807,6 +809,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 		struct ima_digest_data hdr;
 		char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
 	} hash = {};
+	char digest_hash[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
+	int digest_hash_len = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo];
 	int violation = 0;
 	int action = 0;
 	u32 secid;
@@ -849,13 +853,27 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (buf_hash) {
+		memcpy(digest_hash, hash.hdr.digest, digest_hash_len);
+
+		ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(digest_hash, digest_hash_len,
+					   iint.ima_hash);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			audit_cause = "hashing_error";
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		event_data.buf = digest_hash;
+		event_data.buf_len = digest_hash_len;
+	}
+
 	ret = ima_alloc_init_template(&event_data, &entry, template);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		audit_cause = "alloc_entry";
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, buf, pcr);
+	ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, event_data.buf, pcr);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		audit_cause = "store_entry";
 		ima_free_template_entry(entry);
@@ -890,7 +908,8 @@ void ima_kexec_cmdline(int kernel_fd, const void *buf, int size)
 		return;
 
 	process_buffer_measurement(file_inode(f.file), buf, size,
-				   "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL);
+				   "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL,
+				   false);
 	fdput(f);
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
index 69a8626a35c0..c2f2ad34f9b7 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ void ima_process_queued_keys(void)
 						   entry->payload_len,
 						   entry->keyring_name,
 						   KEY_CHECK, 0,
-						   entry->keyring_name);
+						   entry->keyring_name,
+						   false);
 		list_del(&entry->list);
 		ima_free_key_entry(entry);
 	}
-- 
2.17.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
	gmazyland@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, sashal@kernel.org,
	jmorris@namei.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash
Date: Thu,  7 Jan 2021 20:07:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108040708.8389-3-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108040708.8389-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

The original IMA buffer data measurement sizes were small (e.g.  boot
command line), but the new buffer data measurement use cases have data 
sizes that are a lot larger.  Just as IMA measures the file data hash,
not the file data, IMA should similarly support the option for measuring 
buffer data hash.

Introduce a boolean parameter to support measuring buffer data hash,
which would be much smaller, instead of the buffer itself.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h                 |  3 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c        |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c            | 29 ++++++++++++++++----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c      |  3 +-
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index e5622ce8cbb1..0b4634515839 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file,
 			   struct ima_template_desc *template_desc);
 void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-				int pcr, const char *func_data);
+				int pcr, const char *func_data,
+				bool buf_hash);
 void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 			   const unsigned char *filename);
 int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 8361941ee0a1..46ffa38bab12 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 		if ((rc == -EPERM) && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE))
 			process_buffer_measurement(NULL, digest, digestsize,
 						   "blacklisted-hash", NONE,
-						   pcr, NULL);
+						   pcr, NULL, false);
 	}
 
 	return rc;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
index 1c68c500c26f..a74095793936 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c
@@ -60,5 +60,5 @@ void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key,
 	 */
 	process_buffer_measurement(NULL, payload, payload_len,
 				   keyring->description, KEY_CHECK, 0,
-				   keyring->description);
+				   keyring->description, false);
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index b4ed611cd2a4..494fb964497d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
 }
 
 /*
- * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer to ima log.
+ * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer or the buffer data hash
  * @inode: inode associated with the object being measured (NULL for KEY_CHECK)
  * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log.
  * @size: size of buffer(in bytes).
@@ -787,12 +787,14 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
  * @func: IMA hook
  * @pcr: pcr to extend the measurement
  * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL
+ * @buf_hash: measure buffer data hash
  *
- * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log.
+ * Based on policy, either the buffer data or buffer data hash is measured
  */
 void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 				const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-				int pcr, const char *func_data)
+				int pcr, const char *func_data,
+				bool buf_hash)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM";
@@ -807,6 +809,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 		struct ima_digest_data hdr;
 		char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
 	} hash = {};
+	char digest_hash[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
+	int digest_hash_len = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo];
 	int violation = 0;
 	int action = 0;
 	u32 secid;
@@ -849,13 +853,27 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (buf_hash) {
+		memcpy(digest_hash, hash.hdr.digest, digest_hash_len);
+
+		ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(digest_hash, digest_hash_len,
+					   iint.ima_hash);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			audit_cause = "hashing_error";
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		event_data.buf = digest_hash;
+		event_data.buf_len = digest_hash_len;
+	}
+
 	ret = ima_alloc_init_template(&event_data, &entry, template);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		audit_cause = "alloc_entry";
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, buf, pcr);
+	ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, event_data.buf, pcr);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		audit_cause = "store_entry";
 		ima_free_template_entry(entry);
@@ -890,7 +908,8 @@ void ima_kexec_cmdline(int kernel_fd, const void *buf, int size)
 		return;
 
 	process_buffer_measurement(file_inode(f.file), buf, size,
-				   "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL);
+				   "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL,
+				   false);
 	fdput(f);
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
index 69a8626a35c0..c2f2ad34f9b7 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ void ima_process_queued_keys(void)
 						   entry->payload_len,
 						   entry->keyring_name,
 						   KEY_CHECK, 0,
-						   entry->keyring_name);
+						   entry->keyring_name,
+						   false);
 		list_del(&entry->list);
 		ima_free_key_entry(entry);
 	}
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-08  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-08  4:07 [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 0/8] IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 1/8] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07   ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2021-01-08  4:07   ` [PATCH v10 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 3/8] IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07   ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 4/8] IMA: add policy rule to measure " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07   ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 5/8] IMA: limit critical data measurement based on a label Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07   ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-14  2:09   ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14  2:09     ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 17:57     ` [dm-devel] " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-14 17:57       ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 6/8] IMA: extend critical data hook to limit the " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07   ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement policy Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07   ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-08  4:07   ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-12 16:27   ` [dm-devel] " Paul Moore
2021-01-12 16:27     ` Paul Moore
2021-01-12 18:25     ` [dm-devel] " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-12 18:25       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-13 19:13     ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2021-01-13 19:13       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-13 19:19       ` [dm-devel] " Paul Moore
2021-01-13 19:19         ` Paul Moore
2021-01-13 21:11         ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2021-01-13 21:11           ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-13 22:10           ` [dm-devel] " Paul Moore
2021-01-13 22:10             ` Paul Moore
2021-01-13 23:10             ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2021-01-13 23:10               ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14  2:40               ` [dm-devel] " Paul Moore
2021-01-14  2:40                 ` Paul Moore
2021-01-14  2:49                 ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14  2:49                   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 16:22                   ` [dm-devel] " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 16:22                     ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 16:44                     ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 16:44                       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 16:50                       ` [dm-devel] " Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 16:50                         ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-14 17:48                         ` [dm-devel] " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 17:48                           ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 19:21                           ` [dm-devel] " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 19:21                             ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-01-14 16:51                       ` [dm-devel] " Paul Moore
2021-01-14 16:51                         ` Paul Moore
2021-01-15 12:54 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v10 0/8] IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data Mimi Zohar
2021-01-15 12:54   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-01-15 17:26   ` [dm-devel] " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-15 17:26     ` Tushar Sugandhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210108040708.8389-3-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.