From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] arm64: topology: improvements
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:53:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108155334.GA21679@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1610104461.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Friday 08 Jan 2021 at 16:46:50 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the V4 with the general improvements for topology stuff. This
> cleans up the code and makes it work with cpufreq modules.
>
> V4:
> - Added Rby from Ionela.
> - In 3/3, Print cpus instead of amu_fie_cpus and make it pr_debug
> instead.
>
> Viresh Kumar (3):
> arm64: topology: Avoid the have_policy check
> arm64: topology: Reorder init_amu_fie() a bit
> arm64: topology: Make AMUs work with modular cpufreq drivers
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
..for the full set.
Thanks,
Ionela.
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] arm64: topology: improvements
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:53:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108155334.GA21679@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1610104461.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Friday 08 Jan 2021 at 16:46:50 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the V4 with the general improvements for topology stuff. This
> cleans up the code and makes it work with cpufreq modules.
>
> V4:
> - Added Rby from Ionela.
> - In 3/3, Print cpus instead of amu_fie_cpus and make it pr_debug
> instead.
>
> Viresh Kumar (3):
> arm64: topology: Avoid the have_policy check
> arm64: topology: Reorder init_amu_fie() a bit
> arm64: topology: Make AMUs work with modular cpufreq drivers
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
..for the full set.
Thanks,
Ionela.
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-08 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 11:16 [PATCH V4 0/3] arm64: topology: improvements Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 11:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 11:16 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] arm64: topology: Avoid the have_policy check Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 11:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 11:16 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] arm64: topology: Reorder init_amu_fie() a bit Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 11:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 11:16 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] arm64: topology: Make AMUs work with modular cpufreq drivers Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 11:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-08 15:51 ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-08 15:51 ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-08 15:53 ` Ionela Voinescu [this message]
2021-01-08 15:53 ` [PATCH V4 0/3] arm64: topology: improvements Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-11 4:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-11 4:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-19 9:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-19 9:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-20 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2021-01-20 13:01 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210108155334.GA21679@arm.com \
--to=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.