All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:41:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111184154.GC17941@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111132811.2455113-10-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:27:59PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what
> the HW says. Yes, this is dangerous.

Yeah, it's dangerous. We can make it less so if we only allow safe
values (e.g. lower if FTR_UNSIGNED).

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 9a555809b89c..465d2cb63bfc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg {
>  	u64				sys_val;
>  	u64				user_val;
>  	const struct arm64_ftr_bits	*ftr_bits;
> +	u64				*override_val;
> +	u64				*override_mask;
>  };

At the arm64_ftr_reg level, we don't have any information about the safe
values for a feature. Could we instead move this to arm64_ftr_bits? We
probably only need a single field. When populating the feature values,
we can make sure it doesn't go above the hardware one.

I attempted a feature modification for MTE here, though I dropped the
entire series in the meantime as we clarified the ARM ARM:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200515171612.1020-24-catalin.marinas@arm.com/

Srinivas copied it in his patch (but forgot to give credit ;)):

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1610152163-16554-3-git-send-email-sramana@codeaurora.org/

The above adds a filter function but, instead, just use your mechanism in
this series for idreg.feature setting via cmdline. The arm64_ftr_value()
function extracts the hardware value and lowers it if a cmdline argument
was passed.

-- 
Catalin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:41:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111184154.GC17941@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111132811.2455113-10-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:27:59PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what
> the HW says. Yes, this is dangerous.

Yeah, it's dangerous. We can make it less so if we only allow safe
values (e.g. lower if FTR_UNSIGNED).

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 9a555809b89c..465d2cb63bfc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg {
>  	u64				sys_val;
>  	u64				user_val;
>  	const struct arm64_ftr_bits	*ftr_bits;
> +	u64				*override_val;
> +	u64				*override_mask;
>  };

At the arm64_ftr_reg level, we don't have any information about the safe
values for a feature. Could we instead move this to arm64_ftr_bits? We
probably only need a single field. When populating the feature values,
we can make sure it doesn't go above the hardware one.

I attempted a feature modification for MTE here, though I dropped the
entire series in the meantime as we clarified the ARM ARM:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200515171612.1020-24-catalin.marinas@arm.com/

Srinivas copied it in his patch (but forgot to give credit ;)):

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1610152163-16554-3-git-send-email-sramana@codeaurora.org/

The above adds a filter function but, instead, just use your mechanism in
this series for idreg.feature setting via cmdline. The arm64_ftr_value()
function extracts the hardware value and lowers it if a cmdline argument
was passed.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:41:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111184154.GC17941@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111132811.2455113-10-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:27:59PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what
> the HW says. Yes, this is dangerous.

Yeah, it's dangerous. We can make it less so if we only allow safe
values (e.g. lower if FTR_UNSIGNED).

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 9a555809b89c..465d2cb63bfc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg {
>  	u64				sys_val;
>  	u64				user_val;
>  	const struct arm64_ftr_bits	*ftr_bits;
> +	u64				*override_val;
> +	u64				*override_mask;
>  };

At the arm64_ftr_reg level, we don't have any information about the safe
values for a feature. Could we instead move this to arm64_ftr_bits? We
probably only need a single field. When populating the feature values,
we can make sure it doesn't go above the hardware one.

I attempted a feature modification for MTE here, though I dropped the
entire series in the meantime as we clarified the ARM ARM:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200515171612.1020-24-catalin.marinas@arm.com/

Srinivas copied it in his patch (but forgot to give credit ;)):

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1610152163-16554-3-git-send-email-sramana@codeaurora.org/

The above adds a filter function but, instead, just use your mechanism in
this series for idreg.feature setting via cmdline. The arm64_ftr_value()
function extracts the hardware value and lowers it if a cmdline argument
was passed.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11 13:27 [PATCH v3 00/21] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] arm64: Fix labels in el2_setup macros Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] arm64: Fix outdated TCR setup comment Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] arm64: Turn the MMU-on sequence into a macro Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:53   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:53     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:53     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] arm64: Initialise as nVHE before switching to VHE Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] arm64: Move VHE-specific SPE setup to mutate_to_vhe() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] arm64: Simplify init_el2_state to be non-VHE only Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] arm64: Move SCTLR_EL1 initialisation to EL-agnostic code Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 18:41   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-01-11 18:41     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-11 18:41     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-11 19:48     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 19:48       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 19:48       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12  9:17       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12  9:17         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12  9:17         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12 11:50         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 11:50           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 11:50           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 11:51           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 11:51             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 11:51             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 12:20             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12 12:20               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12 12:20               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12 11:59           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12 11:59             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12 11:59             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-12 14:54             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 14:54               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12 14:54               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 20:38     ` Srinivas Ramana
2021-01-11 20:38       ` Srinivas Ramana
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] arm64: cpufeature: Use IDreg override in __read_sysreg_by_encoding() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] arm64: Extract early FDT mapping from kaslr_early_init() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add an early command-line cpufeature override facility Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] arm64: Allow ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.VH to be overridden from the command line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] arm64: Honor VHE being disabled from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] arm64: Add an aliasing facility for the idreg override Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe, protected} an alias of id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0 Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` [PATCH v3 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe,protected} " Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` [PATCH v3 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe, protected} " Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] KVM: arm64: Document HVC_VHE_RESTART stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] arm64: Move "nokaslr" over to the early cpufeature infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of BTI from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] arm64: Defer enabling pointer authentication on boot core Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of Pointer Auth from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11 13:28   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210111184154.GC17941@gaia \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pajay@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.