From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:40:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111194017.22696-2-rppt@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111194017.22696-1-rppt@kernel.org>
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
The first 4Kb of memory is a BIOS owned area and to avoid its allocation
for the kernel it was not listed in e820 tables as memory. As the result,
pfn 0 was never recognised by the generic memory management and it is not a
part of neither node 0 nor ZONE_DMA.
If set_pfnblock_flags_mask() would be ever called for the pageblock
corresponding to the first 2Mbytes of memory, having pfn 0 outside of
ZONE_DMA would trigger
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn), page);
Along with reserving the first 4Kb in e820 tables, several first pages are
reserved with memblock in several places during setup_arch(). These
reservations are enough to ensure the kernel does not touch the BIOS area
and it is not necessary to remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0.
Remove the update of e820 table that changes the type of pfn 0 and move the
comment describing why it was done to trim_low_memory_range() that reserves
the beginning of the memory.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 740f3bdb3f61..3412c4595efd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -660,17 +660,6 @@ static void __init trim_platform_memory_ranges(void)
static void __init trim_bios_range(void)
{
- /*
- * A special case is the first 4Kb of memory;
- * This is a BIOS owned area, not kernel ram, but generally
- * not listed as such in the E820 table.
- *
- * This typically reserves additional memory (64KiB by default)
- * since some BIOSes are known to corrupt low memory. See the
- * Kconfig help text for X86_RESERVE_LOW.
- */
- e820__range_update(0, PAGE_SIZE, E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
-
/*
* special case: Some BIOSes report the PC BIOS
* area (640Kb -> 1Mb) as RAM even though it is not.
@@ -728,6 +717,15 @@ early_param("reservelow", parse_reservelow);
static void __init trim_low_memory_range(void)
{
+ /*
+ * A special case is the first 4Kb of memory;
+ * This is a BIOS owned area, not kernel ram, but generally
+ * not listed as such in the E820 table.
+ *
+ * This typically reserves additional memory (64KiB by default)
+ * since some BIOSes are known to corrupt low memory. See the
+ * Kconfig help text for X86_RESERVE_LOW.
+ */
memblock_reserve(0, ALIGN(reserve_low, PAGE_SIZE));
}
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-11 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 19:40 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout Mike Rapoport
2021-01-11 19:40 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-01-13 8:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0 Oscar Salvador
2021-01-13 11:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-13 12:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-13 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-21 13:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-11 19:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout Mike Rapoport
2021-02-01 9:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-01 9:39 ` Baoquan He
2021-02-01 14:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-12 0:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Andrew Morton
2021-01-12 5:25 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210111194017.22696-2-rppt@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.