All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PCI] dc83615370: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -1.2% regression
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:30:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202101120927.B3345B30@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112141045.GD30747@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2121 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:10:45PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -1.2% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
> 
> commit: dc83615370e7ebcb181a21a8ad13a77c278ab81c ("PCI: Fix PREL32 relocations for LTO")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git for-next/kspp

O_o Well that's surprising. This only creates stubs.

>                                 will-it-scale.workload                          
>                                                                                 
>   2.14e+07 +----------------------------------------------------------------+   
>            |.+. .+ :        +  +.+.               +.+. .+   +.+. .+  :      |   
>   2.13e+07 |-+ +    :    +.+       +             +    +         +    :      |   
>            |        :   :           + .+.+..+. .+                     +.    |   
>   2.12e+07 |-+       :  :            +        +                         +.+.|   
>            |         +.+                                                    |   
>   2.11e+07 |-+                                                              |   
>            |                                                                |   
>    2.1e+07 |-+                   O O     O  O O   O     O                   |   
>            |                 O O     O O        O   O O   O O               |   
>   2.09e+07 |-+         O                                                    |   
>            |         O   O                                                  |   
>   2.08e+07 |-O O O O       O                                                |   
>            |                                                                |   
>   2.07e+07 +----------------------------------------------------------------+   
>                                                                                 
>                                                                                 
> [*] bisect-good sample
> [O] bisect-bad  sample

But it's pretty clear _something_ has happened. We'll investigate...

-- 
Kees Cook

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com,
	feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PCI]  dc83615370:  will-it-scale.per_process_ops -1.2% regression
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:30:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202101120927.B3345B30@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112141045.GD30747@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:10:45PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -1.2% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
> 
> commit: dc83615370e7ebcb181a21a8ad13a77c278ab81c ("PCI: Fix PREL32 relocations for LTO")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git for-next/kspp

O_o Well that's surprising. This only creates stubs.

>                                 will-it-scale.workload                          
>                                                                                 
>   2.14e+07 +----------------------------------------------------------------+   
>            |.+. .+ :        +  +.+.               +.+. .+   +.+. .+  :      |   
>   2.13e+07 |-+ +    :    +.+       +             +    +         +    :      |   
>            |        :   :           + .+.+..+. .+                     +.    |   
>   2.12e+07 |-+       :  :            +        +                         +.+.|   
>            |         +.+                                                    |   
>   2.11e+07 |-+                                                              |   
>            |                                                                |   
>    2.1e+07 |-+                   O O     O  O O   O     O                   |   
>            |                 O O     O O        O   O O   O O               |   
>   2.09e+07 |-+         O                                                    |   
>            |         O   O                                                  |   
>   2.08e+07 |-O O O O       O                                                |   
>            |                                                                |   
>   2.07e+07 +----------------------------------------------------------------+   
>                                                                                 
>                                                                                 
> [*] bisect-good sample
> [O] bisect-bad  sample

But it's pretty clear _something_ has happened. We'll investigate...

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-12 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-12 14:10 [PCI] dc83615370: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -1.2% regression kernel test robot
2021-01-12 14:10 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-12 17:30 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-01-12 17:30   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202101120927.B3345B30@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.