From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: palmerdabbelt@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
guoren@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in ARM/RISCV
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:17:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118091733.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc47f8cf-8778-43ab-77de-9dd220de7c26@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:01:40AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> On 2021/1/17 18:09, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > Correct Russell's mail address (from linux@armlinux.org.uk to
> > > rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, should update the MAINTAINERS)
> > No. MAINTAINERS is correct.
>
> I got following message, so I check mail of your recent patches, and send a
> new one.
>
> Please ignore it, there may be some other problems.
>
> "*Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:*
>
> linux@armlinux.org.uk <mailto:linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> A communication failure occurred during the delivery of this message. Please
> to resend the message later. If the problem continues, contact your
> helpdesk."
That is a most unhelpful bounce message - I suppose it's designed for
non-technical people to ensure that the problem can't be resolved.
From what I can see from my end, every attempt involving your email
address last week (wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com) has been successful, so
I suspect the problem is not at my end.
In any case, all @armlinux.org.uk addresses hit the same server, so
if there's a "communication failure" for the domain, it would affect
all local-parts equally.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: palmerdabbelt@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
guoren@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in ARM/RISCV
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:17:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118091733.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc47f8cf-8778-43ab-77de-9dd220de7c26@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:01:40AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> On 2021/1/17 18:09, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > Correct Russell's mail address (from linux@armlinux.org.uk to
> > > rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, should update the MAINTAINERS)
> > No. MAINTAINERS is correct.
>
> I got following message, so I check mail of your recent patches, and send a
> new one.
>
> Please ignore it, there may be some other problems.
>
> "*Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:*
>
> linux@armlinux.org.uk <mailto:linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> A communication failure occurred during the delivery of this message. Please
> to resend the message later. If the problem continues, contact your
> helpdesk."
That is a most unhelpful bounce message - I suppose it's designed for
non-technical people to ensure that the problem can't be resolved.
From what I can see from my end, every attempt involving your email
address last week (wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com) has been successful, so
I suspect the problem is not at my end.
In any case, all @armlinux.org.uk addresses hit the same server, so
if there's a "communication failure" for the domain, it would affect
all local-parts equally.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
palmerdabbelt@google.com, Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
guoren@kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in ARM/RISCV
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:17:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118091733.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc47f8cf-8778-43ab-77de-9dd220de7c26@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:01:40AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> On 2021/1/17 18:09, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > Correct Russell's mail address (from linux@armlinux.org.uk to
> > > rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, should update the MAINTAINERS)
> > No. MAINTAINERS is correct.
>
> I got following message, so I check mail of your recent patches, and send a
> new one.
>
> Please ignore it, there may be some other problems.
>
> "*Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:*
>
> linux@armlinux.org.uk <mailto:linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> A communication failure occurred during the delivery of this message. Please
> to resend the message later. If the problem continues, contact your
> helpdesk."
That is a most unhelpful bounce message - I suppose it's designed for
non-technical people to ensure that the problem can't be resolved.
From what I can see from my end, every attempt involving your email
address last week (wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com) has been successful, so
I suspect the problem is not at my end.
In any case, all @armlinux.org.uk addresses hit the same server, so
if there's a "communication failure" for the domain, it would affect
all local-parts equally.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 5:46 [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in ARM/RISCV Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] initrd: Add the preprocessor guard in initrd.h Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] initramfs: Provide a common initrd reserve function Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: Covert to reserve_initrd_mem() Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-17 4:58 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-17 4:58 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-17 4:58 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] riscv: " Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-15 5:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-17 4:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in ARM/RISCV Kefeng Wang
2021-01-17 4:57 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-17 4:57 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-17 10:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-17 10:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-17 10:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
[not found] ` <cc47f8cf-8778-43ab-77de-9dd220de7c26@huawei.com>
2021-01-18 9:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2021-01-18 9:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-18 9:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-22 7:29 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-22 7:29 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-22 7:29 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-01-22 3:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-22 3:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-22 3:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210118091733.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=palmerdabbelt@google.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.