All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	<sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<vdumpa@nvidia.com>, <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, <vivek.gautam@arm.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] uacce: Enable IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:27:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119122759.000048f9@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108145217.2254447-6-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:52:13 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> The IOPF (I/O Page Fault) feature is now enabled independently from the
> SVA feature, because some IOPF implementations are device-specific and
> do not require IOMMU support for PCIe PRI or Arm SMMU stall.
> 
> Enable IOPF unconditionally when enabling SVA for now. In the future, if
> a device driver implementing a uacce interface doesn't need IOPF
> support, it will need to tell the uacce module, for example with a new
> flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Hi Jean-Philippe,

A minor suggestion inline but I'm not that bothered so either way
looks good to me.

> ---
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> Cc: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> index d07af4edfcac..41ef1eb62a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,24 @@ static void uacce_release(struct device *dev)
>  	kfree(uacce);
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned int uacce_enable_sva(struct device *parent, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	if (!(flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA))
> +		return flags;
> +
> +	flags &= ~UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> +
> +	if (iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF))
> +		return flags;
> +
> +	if (iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA)) {
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +		return flags;
> +	}
> +
> +	return flags | UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> +}

I'm a great fan of paired enable / disable functions.
Whilst it would be trivial, maybe it is worth introducing

uacce_disable_sva()?
Also make that do the flags check internally to make it match
up with the enable path.


> +
>  /**
>   * uacce_alloc() - alloc an accelerator
>   * @parent: pointer of uacce parent device
> @@ -404,11 +422,7 @@ struct uacce_device *uacce_alloc(struct device *parent,
>  	if (!uacce)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
> -		ret = iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> -		if (ret)
> -			flags &= ~UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> -	}
> +	flags = uacce_enable_sva(parent, flags);
>  
>  	uacce->parent = parent;
>  	uacce->flags = flags;
> @@ -432,8 +446,10 @@ struct uacce_device *uacce_alloc(struct device *parent,
>  	return uacce;
>  
>  err_with_uacce:
> -	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA)
> +	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
>  		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +	}
>  	kfree(uacce);
>  	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  }
> @@ -487,8 +503,10 @@ void uacce_remove(struct uacce_device *uacce)
>  	mutex_unlock(&uacce->queues_lock);
>  
>  	/* disable sva now since no opened queues */
> -	if (uacce->flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA)
> +	if (uacce->flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
>  		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (uacce->cdev)
>  		cdev_device_del(uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: vivek.gautam@arm.com, guohanjun@huawei.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
	lenb@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] uacce: Enable IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:27:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119122759.000048f9@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108145217.2254447-6-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:52:13 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> The IOPF (I/O Page Fault) feature is now enabled independently from the
> SVA feature, because some IOPF implementations are device-specific and
> do not require IOMMU support for PCIe PRI or Arm SMMU stall.
> 
> Enable IOPF unconditionally when enabling SVA for now. In the future, if
> a device driver implementing a uacce interface doesn't need IOPF
> support, it will need to tell the uacce module, for example with a new
> flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Hi Jean-Philippe,

A minor suggestion inline but I'm not that bothered so either way
looks good to me.

> ---
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> Cc: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> index d07af4edfcac..41ef1eb62a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,24 @@ static void uacce_release(struct device *dev)
>  	kfree(uacce);
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned int uacce_enable_sva(struct device *parent, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	if (!(flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA))
> +		return flags;
> +
> +	flags &= ~UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> +
> +	if (iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF))
> +		return flags;
> +
> +	if (iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA)) {
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +		return flags;
> +	}
> +
> +	return flags | UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> +}

I'm a great fan of paired enable / disable functions.
Whilst it would be trivial, maybe it is worth introducing

uacce_disable_sva()?
Also make that do the flags check internally to make it match
up with the enable path.


> +
>  /**
>   * uacce_alloc() - alloc an accelerator
>   * @parent: pointer of uacce parent device
> @@ -404,11 +422,7 @@ struct uacce_device *uacce_alloc(struct device *parent,
>  	if (!uacce)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
> -		ret = iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> -		if (ret)
> -			flags &= ~UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> -	}
> +	flags = uacce_enable_sva(parent, flags);
>  
>  	uacce->parent = parent;
>  	uacce->flags = flags;
> @@ -432,8 +446,10 @@ struct uacce_device *uacce_alloc(struct device *parent,
>  	return uacce;
>  
>  err_with_uacce:
> -	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA)
> +	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
>  		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +	}
>  	kfree(uacce);
>  	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  }
> @@ -487,8 +503,10 @@ void uacce_remove(struct uacce_device *uacce)
>  	mutex_unlock(&uacce->queues_lock);
>  
>  	/* disable sva now since no opened queues */
> -	if (uacce->flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA)
> +	if (uacce->flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
>  		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (uacce->cdev)
>  		cdev_device_del(uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: vivek.gautam@arm.com, guohanjun@huawei.com, will@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
	lenb@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] uacce: Enable IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:27:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119122759.000048f9@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108145217.2254447-6-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:52:13 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> The IOPF (I/O Page Fault) feature is now enabled independently from the
> SVA feature, because some IOPF implementations are device-specific and
> do not require IOMMU support for PCIe PRI or Arm SMMU stall.
> 
> Enable IOPF unconditionally when enabling SVA for now. In the future, if
> a device driver implementing a uacce interface doesn't need IOPF
> support, it will need to tell the uacce module, for example with a new
> flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Hi Jean-Philippe,

A minor suggestion inline but I'm not that bothered so either way
looks good to me.

> ---
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> Cc: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> index d07af4edfcac..41ef1eb62a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,24 @@ static void uacce_release(struct device *dev)
>  	kfree(uacce);
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned int uacce_enable_sva(struct device *parent, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	if (!(flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA))
> +		return flags;
> +
> +	flags &= ~UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> +
> +	if (iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF))
> +		return flags;
> +
> +	if (iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA)) {
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +		return flags;
> +	}
> +
> +	return flags | UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> +}

I'm a great fan of paired enable / disable functions.
Whilst it would be trivial, maybe it is worth introducing

uacce_disable_sva()?
Also make that do the flags check internally to make it match
up with the enable path.


> +
>  /**
>   * uacce_alloc() - alloc an accelerator
>   * @parent: pointer of uacce parent device
> @@ -404,11 +422,7 @@ struct uacce_device *uacce_alloc(struct device *parent,
>  	if (!uacce)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
> -		ret = iommu_dev_enable_feature(parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> -		if (ret)
> -			flags &= ~UACCE_DEV_SVA;
> -	}
> +	flags = uacce_enable_sva(parent, flags);
>  
>  	uacce->parent = parent;
>  	uacce->flags = flags;
> @@ -432,8 +446,10 @@ struct uacce_device *uacce_alloc(struct device *parent,
>  	return uacce;
>  
>  err_with_uacce:
> -	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA)
> +	if (flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
>  		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +	}
>  	kfree(uacce);
>  	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  }
> @@ -487,8 +503,10 @@ void uacce_remove(struct uacce_device *uacce)
>  	mutex_unlock(&uacce->queues_lock);
>  
>  	/* disable sva now since no opened queues */
> -	if (uacce->flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA)
> +	if (uacce->flags & UACCE_DEV_SVA) {
>  		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> +		iommu_dev_disable_feature(uacce->parent, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (uacce->cdev)
>  		cdev_device_del(uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-08 14:52 [PATCH v9 00/10] iommu: I/O page faults for SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] iommu: Remove obsolete comment Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-19 11:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 11:11     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 11:11     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-20 17:41     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:41       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:41       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-19 11:22   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 11:22     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 11:22     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] iommu: Separate IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF from IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-12  4:31   ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-12  4:31     ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-12  4:31     ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-12  9:16     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-12  9:16       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-12  9:16       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-13  2:49       ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-13  2:49         ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-13  2:49         ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-13  8:10         ` Tian, Kevin
2021-01-13  8:10           ` Tian, Kevin
2021-01-13  8:10           ` Tian, Kevin
2021-01-14 16:41           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-14 16:41             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-14 16:41             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-16  3:54             ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-16  3:54               ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-16  3:54               ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-18  6:54               ` Tian, Kevin
2021-01-18  6:54                 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-01-18  6:54                 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-01-19 10:16                 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-19 10:16                   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-19 10:16                   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20  1:57                   ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-20  1:57                     ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-20  1:57                     ` Lu Baolu
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] iommu/vt-d: Support IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] uacce: Enable IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-11  3:29   ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-01-11  3:29     ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-01-11  3:29     ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-01-19 12:27   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-01-19 12:27     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 12:27     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-20 17:42     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:42       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:42       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 20:47   ` Dave Jiang
2021-01-20 20:47     ` Dave Jiang
2021-01-20 20:47     ` Dave Jiang
2021-01-22 11:53     ` Zhou Wang
2021-01-22 11:53       ` Zhou Wang
2021-01-22 11:53       ` Zhou Wang
2021-01-22 15:43       ` Dave Jiang
2021-01-22 15:43         ` Dave Jiang
2021-01-22 15:43         ` Dave Jiang
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] iommu: Add a page fault handler Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-19 13:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 13:38     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 13:38     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-20 17:43     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:43       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:43       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-19 13:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 13:51     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-19 13:51     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] dt-bindings: document stall property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] ACPI/IORT: Enable stall support for platform devices Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add " Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-08 14:52   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-19 17:28   ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-19 17:28     ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-19 17:28     ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-20 17:55     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:55       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-20 17:55       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-11  3:26 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] iommu: I/O page faults for SMMUv3 Zhangfei Gao
2021-01-11  3:26   ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-01-11  3:26   ` Zhangfei Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119122759.000048f9@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@arm.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.