From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
Cc: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Adam Ford-BE <aford@beaconembedded.com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] clk: imx: Fix reparenting of UARTs not associated with sdout
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:50:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120155001.GD19063@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210120152813.x2pbs5vprevkly23@fsr-ub1664-175>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:28:13PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 21-01-20 16:13:05, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Abel,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:44:54PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > On 21-01-18 08:00:43, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:52 AM Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TBH, I'm against the idea of having to call consumer API from a clock provider driver.
> > > > > I'm still investigating a way of moving the uart clock control calls in drivers/serial/imx,
> > > > > where they belong.
> > > >
> > > > That makes sense.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Just a thought. The uart clock used for console remains on from u-boot,
> > > so maybe it's enough to just add the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag to all the
> > > uart root clocks and remove the prepare/enable calls for uart clocks
> > > for good. I don't really have a way to test it right now, but maybe
> > > you could give it a try.
> >
> > That would mean that UART clocks will never be disabled, regardless of
> > whether they are used for console or not. That doesn't sound very
> > appealing.
>
> AFAIK, the only uart clock that is enabled by u-boot is the one used for
> the console. Later on, when the serial driver probes, it will enable it itself.
>
> Unless I'm missing something, this is exactly what we need.
It might enable it, but with CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED the clock won't be
disabled again when a port is closed after usage
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
Cc: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Adam Ford-BE <aford@beaconembedded.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] clk: imx: Fix reparenting of UARTs not associated with sdout
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:50:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120155001.GD19063@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210120152813.x2pbs5vprevkly23@fsr-ub1664-175>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:28:13PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 21-01-20 16:13:05, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Abel,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:44:54PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > On 21-01-18 08:00:43, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:52 AM Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TBH, I'm against the idea of having to call consumer API from a clock provider driver.
> > > > > I'm still investigating a way of moving the uart clock control calls in drivers/serial/imx,
> > > > > where they belong.
> > > >
> > > > That makes sense.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Just a thought. The uart clock used for console remains on from u-boot,
> > > so maybe it's enough to just add the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag to all the
> > > uart root clocks and remove the prepare/enable calls for uart clocks
> > > for good. I don't really have a way to test it right now, but maybe
> > > you could give it a try.
> >
> > That would mean that UART clocks will never be disabled, regardless of
> > whether they are used for console or not. That doesn't sound very
> > appealing.
>
> AFAIK, the only uart clock that is enabled by u-boot is the one used for
> the console. Later on, when the serial driver probes, it will enable it itself.
>
> Unless I'm missing something, this is exactly what we need.
It might enable it, but with CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED the clock won't be
disabled again when a port is closed after usage
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 18:29 [PATCH V3] clk: imx: Fix reparenting of UARTs not associated with sdout Adam Ford
2021-01-15 18:29 ` Adam Ford
2021-01-18 12:52 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-18 12:52 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-18 14:00 ` Adam Ford
2021-01-18 14:00 ` Adam Ford
2021-01-20 14:44 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-20 14:44 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-20 15:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-01-20 15:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-01-20 15:28 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-20 15:28 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-20 15:50 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2021-01-20 15:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-01-20 16:14 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-20 16:14 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-21 9:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-01-21 9:56 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-01-21 10:24 ` Abel Vesa
2021-01-21 10:24 ` Abel Vesa
2021-02-03 21:22 ` Adam Ford
2021-02-03 21:22 ` Adam Ford
2021-02-13 14:44 ` Adam Ford
2021-02-13 14:44 ` Adam Ford
2021-02-15 13:06 ` Abel Vesa
2021-02-15 13:06 ` Abel Vesa
2021-03-02 19:03 ` Adam Ford
2021-03-02 19:03 ` Adam Ford
2021-03-03 8:31 ` Abel Vesa
2021-03-03 8:31 ` Abel Vesa
2021-03-10 22:24 ` Abel Vesa
2021-03-10 22:24 ` Abel Vesa
2021-03-10 22:43 ` Adam Ford
2021-03-10 22:43 ` Adam Ford
2021-03-05 12:21 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-05 12:21 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210120155001.GD19063@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
--cc=aford173@gmail.com \
--cc=aford@beaconembedded.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.