All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Kevin Herbert <kph@platinasystems.com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Biwen Li <biwen.li@nxp.com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	linux@rempel-privat.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
	Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
	Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@nxp.com>, Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Biwen Li <biwen.li@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:20:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210128092048.GK963@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABP=6zY0xV3dLE5t7qad6TauQsaLmQtYi73BS9XBHwZ2FrgM8g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:27:11PM -0800, Kevin Herbert wrote:
> The loop sends either one or two events to the slave driver. If the
> state is I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, we synthesize the
> I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED event, and then our state becomes
> I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED. In all other states, we transition to
> I2C_SLAVE_STOP and exit the loop.
> 
> It is not a busy loop at all. It is calling the callback handler (that
> already expects to be in IRQ context) one or two times, and then it
> exits the loop.

Oleksij, does this answer your question?


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Kevin Herbert <kph@platinasystems.com>
Cc: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, Biwen Li <biwen.li@nxp.com>,
	festevam@gmail.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Biwen Li <biwen.li@oss.nxp.com>,
	linux@rempel-privat.de, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@nxp.com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:20:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210128092048.GK963@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABP=6zY0xV3dLE5t7qad6TauQsaLmQtYi73BS9XBHwZ2FrgM8g@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:27:11PM -0800, Kevin Herbert wrote:
> The loop sends either one or two events to the slave driver. If the
> state is I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, we synthesize the
> I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED event, and then our state becomes
> I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED. In all other states, we transition to
> I2C_SLAVE_STOP and exit the loop.
> 
> It is not a busy loop at all. It is calling the callback handler (that
> already expects to be in IRQ context) one or two times, and then it
> exits the loop.

Oleksij, does this answer your question?


[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-22 19:48 [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts Kevin Paul Herbert
2020-12-22 19:48 ` Kevin Paul Herbert
2021-01-08  8:05 ` Oleksij Rempel
2021-01-08  8:05   ` Oleksij Rempel
2021-01-15  1:27   ` Kevin Herbert
2021-01-15  1:27     ` Kevin Herbert
2021-01-28  9:20     ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2021-01-28  9:20       ` Wolfram Sang
2021-01-29  9:12       ` Oleksij Rempel
2021-02-01 22:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-02-01 22:13   ` Wolfram Sang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-18 17:53 Kevin Herbert
2020-12-18 17:53 ` Kevin Herbert
2020-12-19 14:47 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-12-19 14:47   ` Fabio Estevam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210128092048.GK963@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=biwen.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=biwen.li@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiafei.pan@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kph@platinasystems.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaobo.xie@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.