All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/21] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2021 11:56:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201115637.3123740-5-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201115637.3123740-1-maz@kernel.org>

As we are about to change the way a VHE system boots, let's
provide the core helper, in the form of a stub hypercall that
enables VHE and replicates the full EL1 context at EL2, thanks
to EL1 and VHE-EL2 being extremely similar.

On exception return, the kernel carries on at EL2. Fancy!

Nothing calls this new hypercall yet, so no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h |  7 +++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S  | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index ee6a48df89d9..7379f35ae2c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -35,8 +35,13 @@
  */
 #define HVC_RESET_VECTORS 2
 
+/*
+ * HVC_VHE_RESTART - Upgrade the CPU from EL1 to EL2, if possible
+ */
+#define HVC_VHE_RESTART	3
+
 /* Max number of HYP stub hypercalls */
-#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 3
+#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 4
 
 /* Error returned when an invalid stub number is passed into x0 */
 #define HVC_STUB_ERR	0xbadca11
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
index 160f5881a0b7..3f3dbbe8914d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
 
 #include <asm/assembler.h>
+#include <asm/el2_setup.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
@@ -47,10 +47,13 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__hyp_stub_vectors)
 
 SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
 	cmp	x0, #HVC_SET_VECTORS
-	b.ne	2f
+	b.ne	1f
 	msr	vbar_el2, x1
 	b	9f
 
+1:	cmp	x0, #HVC_VHE_RESTART
+	b.eq	mutate_to_vhe
+
 2:	cmp	x0, #HVC_SOFT_RESTART
 	b.ne	3f
 	mov	x0, x2
@@ -70,6 +73,75 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
 	eret
 SYM_CODE_END(el1_sync)
 
+// nVHE? No way! Give me the real thing!
+SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(mutate_to_vhe)
+	// Be prepared to fail
+	mov_q	x0, HVC_STUB_ERR
+
+	// Sanity check: MMU *must* be off
+	mrs	x1, sctlr_el2
+	tbnz	x1, #0, 1f
+
+	// Needs to be VHE capable, obviously
+	mrs	x1, id_aa64mmfr1_el1
+	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR1_VHE_SHIFT, #4
+	cbz	x1, 1f
+
+	// Engage the VHE magic!
+	mov_q	x0, HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS
+	msr	hcr_el2, x0
+	isb
+
+	// Doesn't do much on VHE, but still, worth a shot
+	init_el2_state vhe
+
+	// Use the EL1 allocated stack, per-cpu offset
+	mrs	x0, sp_el1
+	mov	sp, x0
+	mrs	x0, tpidr_el1
+	msr	tpidr_el2, x0
+
+	// FP configuration, vectors
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_CPACR_EL12
+	msr	cpacr_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_VBAR_EL12
+	msr	vbar_el1, x0
+
+	// Transfer the MM state from EL1 to EL2
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TCR_EL12
+	msr	tcr_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TTBR0_EL12
+	msr	ttbr0_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TTBR1_EL12
+	msr	ttbr1_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_MAIR_EL12
+	msr	mair_el1, x0
+	isb
+
+	// Invalidate TLBs before enabling the MMU
+	tlbi	vmalle1
+	dsb	nsh
+
+	// Enable the EL2 S1 MMU, as set up from EL1
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_SCTLR_EL12
+	set_sctlr_el1	x0
+
+	// Disable the EL1 S1 MMU for a good measure
+	mov_q	x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF
+	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x0
+
+	// Hack the exception return to stay at EL2
+	mrs	x0, spsr_el1
+	and	x0, x0, #~PSR_MODE_MASK
+	mov	x1, #PSR_MODE_EL2h
+	orr	x0, x0, x1
+	msr	spsr_el1, x0
+
+	mov	x0, xzr
+
+1:	eret
+SYM_CODE_END(mutate_to_vhe)
+
 .macro invalid_vector	label
 SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(\label)
 	b \label
-- 
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/21] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2021 11:56:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201115637.3123740-5-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201115637.3123740-1-maz@kernel.org>

As we are about to change the way a VHE system boots, let's
provide the core helper, in the form of a stub hypercall that
enables VHE and replicates the full EL1 context at EL2, thanks
to EL1 and VHE-EL2 being extremely similar.

On exception return, the kernel carries on at EL2. Fancy!

Nothing calls this new hypercall yet, so no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h |  7 +++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S  | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index ee6a48df89d9..7379f35ae2c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -35,8 +35,13 @@
  */
 #define HVC_RESET_VECTORS 2
 
+/*
+ * HVC_VHE_RESTART - Upgrade the CPU from EL1 to EL2, if possible
+ */
+#define HVC_VHE_RESTART	3
+
 /* Max number of HYP stub hypercalls */
-#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 3
+#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 4
 
 /* Error returned when an invalid stub number is passed into x0 */
 #define HVC_STUB_ERR	0xbadca11
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
index 160f5881a0b7..3f3dbbe8914d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
 
 #include <asm/assembler.h>
+#include <asm/el2_setup.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
@@ -47,10 +47,13 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__hyp_stub_vectors)
 
 SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
 	cmp	x0, #HVC_SET_VECTORS
-	b.ne	2f
+	b.ne	1f
 	msr	vbar_el2, x1
 	b	9f
 
+1:	cmp	x0, #HVC_VHE_RESTART
+	b.eq	mutate_to_vhe
+
 2:	cmp	x0, #HVC_SOFT_RESTART
 	b.ne	3f
 	mov	x0, x2
@@ -70,6 +73,75 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
 	eret
 SYM_CODE_END(el1_sync)
 
+// nVHE? No way! Give me the real thing!
+SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(mutate_to_vhe)
+	// Be prepared to fail
+	mov_q	x0, HVC_STUB_ERR
+
+	// Sanity check: MMU *must* be off
+	mrs	x1, sctlr_el2
+	tbnz	x1, #0, 1f
+
+	// Needs to be VHE capable, obviously
+	mrs	x1, id_aa64mmfr1_el1
+	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR1_VHE_SHIFT, #4
+	cbz	x1, 1f
+
+	// Engage the VHE magic!
+	mov_q	x0, HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS
+	msr	hcr_el2, x0
+	isb
+
+	// Doesn't do much on VHE, but still, worth a shot
+	init_el2_state vhe
+
+	// Use the EL1 allocated stack, per-cpu offset
+	mrs	x0, sp_el1
+	mov	sp, x0
+	mrs	x0, tpidr_el1
+	msr	tpidr_el2, x0
+
+	// FP configuration, vectors
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_CPACR_EL12
+	msr	cpacr_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_VBAR_EL12
+	msr	vbar_el1, x0
+
+	// Transfer the MM state from EL1 to EL2
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TCR_EL12
+	msr	tcr_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TTBR0_EL12
+	msr	ttbr0_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TTBR1_EL12
+	msr	ttbr1_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_MAIR_EL12
+	msr	mair_el1, x0
+	isb
+
+	// Invalidate TLBs before enabling the MMU
+	tlbi	vmalle1
+	dsb	nsh
+
+	// Enable the EL2 S1 MMU, as set up from EL1
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_SCTLR_EL12
+	set_sctlr_el1	x0
+
+	// Disable the EL1 S1 MMU for a good measure
+	mov_q	x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF
+	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x0
+
+	// Hack the exception return to stay at EL2
+	mrs	x0, spsr_el1
+	and	x0, x0, #~PSR_MODE_MASK
+	mov	x1, #PSR_MODE_EL2h
+	orr	x0, x0, x1
+	msr	spsr_el1, x0
+
+	mov	x0, xzr
+
+1:	eret
+SYM_CODE_END(mutate_to_vhe)
+
 .macro invalid_vector	label
 SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(\label)
 	b \label
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/21] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2021 11:56:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201115637.3123740-5-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201115637.3123740-1-maz@kernel.org>

As we are about to change the way a VHE system boots, let's
provide the core helper, in the form of a stub hypercall that
enables VHE and replicates the full EL1 context at EL2, thanks
to EL1 and VHE-EL2 being extremely similar.

On exception return, the kernel carries on at EL2. Fancy!

Nothing calls this new hypercall yet, so no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h |  7 +++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S  | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index ee6a48df89d9..7379f35ae2c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -35,8 +35,13 @@
  */
 #define HVC_RESET_VECTORS 2
 
+/*
+ * HVC_VHE_RESTART - Upgrade the CPU from EL1 to EL2, if possible
+ */
+#define HVC_VHE_RESTART	3
+
 /* Max number of HYP stub hypercalls */
-#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 3
+#define HVC_STUB_HCALL_NR 4
 
 /* Error returned when an invalid stub number is passed into x0 */
 #define HVC_STUB_ERR	0xbadca11
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
index 160f5881a0b7..3f3dbbe8914d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
 
 #include <asm/assembler.h>
+#include <asm/el2_setup.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
@@ -47,10 +47,13 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__hyp_stub_vectors)
 
 SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
 	cmp	x0, #HVC_SET_VECTORS
-	b.ne	2f
+	b.ne	1f
 	msr	vbar_el2, x1
 	b	9f
 
+1:	cmp	x0, #HVC_VHE_RESTART
+	b.eq	mutate_to_vhe
+
 2:	cmp	x0, #HVC_SOFT_RESTART
 	b.ne	3f
 	mov	x0, x2
@@ -70,6 +73,75 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(el1_sync)
 	eret
 SYM_CODE_END(el1_sync)
 
+// nVHE? No way! Give me the real thing!
+SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(mutate_to_vhe)
+	// Be prepared to fail
+	mov_q	x0, HVC_STUB_ERR
+
+	// Sanity check: MMU *must* be off
+	mrs	x1, sctlr_el2
+	tbnz	x1, #0, 1f
+
+	// Needs to be VHE capable, obviously
+	mrs	x1, id_aa64mmfr1_el1
+	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR1_VHE_SHIFT, #4
+	cbz	x1, 1f
+
+	// Engage the VHE magic!
+	mov_q	x0, HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS
+	msr	hcr_el2, x0
+	isb
+
+	// Doesn't do much on VHE, but still, worth a shot
+	init_el2_state vhe
+
+	// Use the EL1 allocated stack, per-cpu offset
+	mrs	x0, sp_el1
+	mov	sp, x0
+	mrs	x0, tpidr_el1
+	msr	tpidr_el2, x0
+
+	// FP configuration, vectors
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_CPACR_EL12
+	msr	cpacr_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_VBAR_EL12
+	msr	vbar_el1, x0
+
+	// Transfer the MM state from EL1 to EL2
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TCR_EL12
+	msr	tcr_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TTBR0_EL12
+	msr	ttbr0_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_TTBR1_EL12
+	msr	ttbr1_el1, x0
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_MAIR_EL12
+	msr	mair_el1, x0
+	isb
+
+	// Invalidate TLBs before enabling the MMU
+	tlbi	vmalle1
+	dsb	nsh
+
+	// Enable the EL2 S1 MMU, as set up from EL1
+	mrs_s	x0, SYS_SCTLR_EL12
+	set_sctlr_el1	x0
+
+	// Disable the EL1 S1 MMU for a good measure
+	mov_q	x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF
+	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x0
+
+	// Hack the exception return to stay at EL2
+	mrs	x0, spsr_el1
+	and	x0, x0, #~PSR_MODE_MASK
+	mov	x1, #PSR_MODE_EL2h
+	orr	x0, x0, x1
+	msr	spsr_el1, x0
+
+	mov	x0, xzr
+
+1:	eret
+SYM_CODE_END(mutate_to_vhe)
+
 .macro invalid_vector	label
 SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(\label)
 	b \label
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 11:56 [PATCH v6 00/21] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] arm64: Fix labels in el2_setup macros Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] arm64: Fix outdated TCR setup comment Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] arm64: Turn the MMU-on sequence into a macro Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-02-01 11:56   ` [PATCH v6 04/21] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] arm64: Initialise as nVHE before switching to VHE Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-05 12:01   ` Hector Martin 'marcan'
2021-02-05 12:01     ` Hector Martin 'marcan'
2021-02-05 12:01     ` Hector Martin 'marcan'
2021-02-05 14:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-05 14:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-05 14:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-06 14:29       ` Hector Martin 'marcan'
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] arm64: Move VHE-specific SPE setup to mutate_to_vhe() Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-03 21:13   ` Will Deacon
2021-02-03 21:13     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-03 21:13     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-04  9:30     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-04  9:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-04  9:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-04  9:34       ` Will Deacon
2021-02-04  9:34         ` Will Deacon
2021-02-04  9:34         ` Will Deacon
2021-02-04  9:50         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-04  9:50           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-04  9:50           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] arm64: Simplify init_el2_state to be non-VHE only Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] arm64: Move SCTLR_EL1 initialisation to EL-agnostic code Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] arm64: cpufeature: Use IDreg override in __read_sysreg_by_encoding() Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] arm64: Extract early FDT mapping from kaslr_early_init() Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add an early command-line cpufeature override facility Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-05 16:35   ` Will Deacon
2021-02-05 16:35     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-05 16:35     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-05 16:42     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-05 16:42       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-05 16:42       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] arm64: Allow ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.VH to be overridden from the command line Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] arm64: Honor VHE being disabled from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] arm64: Add an aliasing facility for the idreg override Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe, protected} an alias of id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0 Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] KVM: arm64: Document HVC_VHE_RESTART stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] arm64: Move "nokaslr" over to the early cpufeature infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of BTI from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] arm64: Defer enabling pointer authentication on boot core Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of Pointer Auth from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-01 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210201115637.3123740-5-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pajay@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.