From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, airlied@linux.ie,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, hch@lst.de,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
joe.jin@oracle.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, bp@alien8.de,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
jgross@suse.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 2/6] swiotlb: convert variables to arrays
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:29:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204072947.GA29812@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203233709.19819-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:37:05PM -0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This patch converts several swiotlb related variables to arrays, in
> order to maintain stat/status for different swiotlb buffers. Here are
> variables involved:
>
> - io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end
> - io_tlb_nslabs and io_tlb_used
> - io_tlb_list
> - io_tlb_index
> - max_segment
> - io_tlb_orig_addr
> - no_iotlb_memory
>
> There is no functional change and this is to prepare to enable 64-bit
> swiotlb.
Claire Chang (on Cc) already posted a patch like this a month ago,
which looks much better because it actually uses a struct instead
of all the random variables.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, airlied@linux.ie,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, hch@lst.de,
sstabellini@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org, joe.jin@oracle.com,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
bp@alien8.de, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
jgross@suse.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
daniel@ffwll.ch, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/6] swiotlb: convert variables to arrays
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:29:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204072947.GA29812@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203233709.19819-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:37:05PM -0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This patch converts several swiotlb related variables to arrays, in
> order to maintain stat/status for different swiotlb buffers. Here are
> variables involved:
>
> - io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end
> - io_tlb_nslabs and io_tlb_used
> - io_tlb_list
> - io_tlb_index
> - max_segment
> - io_tlb_orig_addr
> - no_iotlb_memory
>
> There is no functional change and this is to prepare to enable 64-bit
> swiotlb.
Claire Chang (on Cc) already posted a patch like this a month ago,
which looks much better because it actually uses a struct instead
of all the random variables.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
bskeggs@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com, bp@alien8.de,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, hch@lst.de, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
daniel@ffwll.ch, airlied@linux.ie, hpa@zytor.com,
mingo@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, jgross@suse.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
matthew.auld@intel.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, rppt@kernel.org,
paulus@samba.org, peterz@infradead.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de,
tglx@linutronix.de, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, joe.jin@oracle.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/6] swiotlb: convert variables to arrays
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:29:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204072947.GA29812@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203233709.19819-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:37:05PM -0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This patch converts several swiotlb related variables to arrays, in
> order to maintain stat/status for different swiotlb buffers. Here are
> variables involved:
>
> - io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end
> - io_tlb_nslabs and io_tlb_used
> - io_tlb_list
> - io_tlb_index
> - max_segment
> - io_tlb_orig_addr
> - no_iotlb_memory
>
> There is no functional change and this is to prepare to enable 64-bit
> swiotlb.
Claire Chang (on Cc) already posted a patch like this a month ago,
which looks much better because it actually uses a struct instead
of all the random variables.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, airlied@linux.ie,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, hch@lst.de,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
joe.jin@oracle.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
bp@alien8.de, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
jgross@suse.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH RFC v1 2/6] swiotlb: convert variables to arrays
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:29:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204072947.GA29812@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203233709.19819-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:37:05PM -0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This patch converts several swiotlb related variables to arrays, in
> order to maintain stat/status for different swiotlb buffers. Here are
> variables involved:
>
> - io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end
> - io_tlb_nslabs and io_tlb_used
> - io_tlb_list
> - io_tlb_index
> - max_segment
> - io_tlb_orig_addr
> - no_iotlb_memory
>
> There is no functional change and this is to prepare to enable 64-bit
> swiotlb.
Claire Chang (on Cc) already posted a patch like this a month ago,
which looks much better because it actually uses a struct instead
of all the random variables.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, airlied@linux.ie,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, hch@lst.de,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, joe.jin@oracle.com,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
bp@alien8.de, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
jgross@suse.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/6] swiotlb: convert variables to arrays
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:29:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204072947.GA29812@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203233709.19819-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:37:05PM -0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This patch converts several swiotlb related variables to arrays, in
> order to maintain stat/status for different swiotlb buffers. Here are
> variables involved:
>
> - io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end
> - io_tlb_nslabs and io_tlb_used
> - io_tlb_list
> - io_tlb_index
> - max_segment
> - io_tlb_orig_addr
> - no_iotlb_memory
>
> There is no functional change and this is to prepare to enable 64-bit
> swiotlb.
Claire Chang (on Cc) already posted a patch like this a month ago,
which looks much better because it actually uses a struct instead
of all the random variables.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-03 23:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 0/6] swiotlb: 64-bit DMA buffer Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Nouveau] " Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 1/6] swiotlb: define new enumerated type Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Nouveau] " Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 2/6] swiotlb: convert variables to arrays Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Nouveau] " Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-04 4:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 5:16 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-02-04 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 7:29 ` [Nouveau] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 11:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2021-02-04 11:49 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-04 11:49 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-04 11:49 ` [Nouveau] " Robin Murphy
2021-02-04 11:49 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-04 11:49 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-04 19:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-04 19:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-04 19:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-04 19:31 ` [Nouveau] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-04 19:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-04 19:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 3/6] swiotlb: introduce swiotlb_get_type() to calculate swiotlb buffer type Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Nouveau] " Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 4/6] swiotlb: enable 64-bit swiotlb Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Nouveau] " Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-04 4:10 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 5/6] xen-swiotlb: convert variables to arrays Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Nouveau] " Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-04 8:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 8:40 ` [Nouveau] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-04 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-07 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-07 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-07 15:56 ` [Nouveau] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-07 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-07 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-19 20:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-19 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-19 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-19 20:32 ` [Nouveau] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-19 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-19 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-02-19 23:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-19 23:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-19 23:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-19 23:59 ` [Nouveau] " Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-19 23:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-19 23:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-23 1:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-23 1:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-23 1:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-23 1:22 ` [Nouveau] " Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-23 1:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-23 1:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 6/6] xen-swiotlb: enable 64-bit xen-swiotlb Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` [Nouveau] " Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-03 23:37 ` Dongli Zhang
2021-02-04 11:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 19:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for swiotlb: 64-bit DMA buffer Patchwork
2021-02-04 19:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-02-04 20:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-05 2:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210204072947.GA29812@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tientzu@chromium.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.