From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofsd: Save error code early at the failure callsite
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:40:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208224024.43555-2-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210208224024.43555-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Change error code handling slightly in lo_setattr(). Right now we seem
to jump to out_err and assume that "errno" is valid and use that to
send reply.
But if caller has to do some other operations before jumping to out_err,
then it does the dance of first saving errno to saverr and the restore
errno before jumping to out_err. This makes it more confusing.
I am about to make more changes where caller will have to do some
work after error before jumping to out_err. I found it easier to
change the convention a bit. That is caller saves error in "saverr"
before jumping to out_err. And out_err uses "saverr" to send error
back and does not rely on "errno" having actual error.
v3: Resolved conflicts in lo_setattr() due to lo_inode_open() changes.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 147b59338a..5dd6a4a4a6 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
res = fchmodat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, attr->st_mode, 0);
}
if (res == -1) {
+ saverr = errno;
goto out_err;
}
}
@@ -707,6 +708,7 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
res = fchownat(ifd, "", uid, gid, AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
if (res == -1) {
+ saverr = errno;
goto out_err;
}
}
@@ -718,16 +720,15 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
} else {
truncfd = lo_inode_open(lo, inode, O_RDWR);
if (truncfd < 0) {
- errno = -truncfd;
+ saverr = -truncfd;
goto out_err;
}
}
res = ftruncate(truncfd, attr->st_size);
+ saverr = res == -1 ? errno : 0;
if (!fi) {
- saverr = errno;
close(truncfd);
- errno = saverr;
}
if (res == -1) {
goto out_err;
@@ -760,6 +761,7 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
res = utimensat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, tv, 0);
}
if (res == -1) {
+ saverr = errno;
goto out_err;
}
}
@@ -768,7 +770,6 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
return lo_getattr(req, ino, fi);
out_err:
- saverr = errno;
lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
}
--
2.25.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com
Cc: mszeredi@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com, groug@kaod.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofsd: Save error code early at the failure callsite
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:40:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208224024.43555-2-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210208224024.43555-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Change error code handling slightly in lo_setattr(). Right now we seem
to jump to out_err and assume that "errno" is valid and use that to
send reply.
But if caller has to do some other operations before jumping to out_err,
then it does the dance of first saving errno to saverr and the restore
errno before jumping to out_err. This makes it more confusing.
I am about to make more changes where caller will have to do some
work after error before jumping to out_err. I found it easier to
change the convention a bit. That is caller saves error in "saverr"
before jumping to out_err. And out_err uses "saverr" to send error
back and does not rely on "errno" having actual error.
v3: Resolved conflicts in lo_setattr() due to lo_inode_open() changes.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 147b59338a..5dd6a4a4a6 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
res = fchmodat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, attr->st_mode, 0);
}
if (res == -1) {
+ saverr = errno;
goto out_err;
}
}
@@ -707,6 +708,7 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
res = fchownat(ifd, "", uid, gid, AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
if (res == -1) {
+ saverr = errno;
goto out_err;
}
}
@@ -718,16 +720,15 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
} else {
truncfd = lo_inode_open(lo, inode, O_RDWR);
if (truncfd < 0) {
- errno = -truncfd;
+ saverr = -truncfd;
goto out_err;
}
}
res = ftruncate(truncfd, attr->st_size);
+ saverr = res == -1 ? errno : 0;
if (!fi) {
- saverr = errno;
close(truncfd);
- errno = saverr;
}
if (res == -1) {
goto out_err;
@@ -760,6 +761,7 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
res = utimensat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, tv, 0);
}
if (res == -1) {
+ saverr = errno;
goto out_err;
}
}
@@ -768,7 +770,6 @@ static void lo_setattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct stat *attr,
return lo_getattr(req, ino, fi);
out_err:
- saverr = errno;
lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
}
--
2.25.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 22:40 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] viritofsd: Add support for FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 Vivek Goyal
2021-02-08 22:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-02-08 22:40 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2021-02-08 22:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] virtiofsd: Save error code early at the failure callsite Vivek Goyal
2021-02-08 22:40 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/2] viriofsd: Add support for FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 Vivek Goyal
2021-02-08 22:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-02-16 16:58 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 0/2] viritofsd: " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-02-16 16:58 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210208224024.43555-2-vgoyal@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.