All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, Rachel Sibley <rasibley@redhat.com>,
	Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com, CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel null pointer at nvme_tcp_init_iter+0x7d/0xd0 [nvme_tcp]
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:21:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209042103.GB63798@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6147d452-a12e-c76c-22f1-5d9e7cb6b01d@grimberg.me>

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:42:28AM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> > > Hi Sagi
> > > 
> > > On 2/8/21 5:46 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hello
> > > > > 
> > > > > We found this kernel NULL pointer issue with latest
> > > > > linux-block/for-next and it's 100% reproduced, let me know
> > > > > if you need more info/testing, thanks
> > > > > 
> > > > > Kernel repo:
> > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
> > > > > Commit: 11f8b6fd0db9 - Merge branch 'for-5.12/io_uring' into for-next
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reproducer: blktests nvme-tcp/012
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for reporting Ming, I've tried to reproduce this on my VM
> > > > but did not succeed. Given that you have it 100% reproducible,
> > > > can you try to revert commit:
> > > > 
> > > > 0dc9edaf80ea nvme-tcp: pass multipage bvec to request iov_iter
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Revert this commit fixed the issue and I've attached the config. :)
> > 
> > Good to know,
> > 
> > I see some differences that I should probably change to hit this:
> > -- 
> > @@ -254,14 +256,15 @@ CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y
> >   # end of Kernel Performance Events And Counters
> > 
> >   CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS=y
> > +CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
> >   # CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set
> > -CONFIG_SLAB=y
> > -# CONFIG_SLUB is not set
> > -# CONFIG_SLOB is not set
> > -CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT=y
> > -# CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM is not set
> > +# CONFIG_SLAB is not set
> > +CONFIG_SLUB=y
> > +# CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT is not set
> > +CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM=y
> >   # CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED is not set
> > -# CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR is not set
> > +CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR=y
> > +CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL=y
> >   CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION=y
> >   CONFIG_PROFILING=y
> >   CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=y
> > @@ -299,7 +302,8 @@ CONFIG_HAVE_INTEL_TXT=y
> >   CONFIG_X86_64_SMP=y
> >   CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES=y
> >   CONFIG_FIX_EARLYCON_MEM=y
> > -CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=4
> > +CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK=y
> > +CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=5
> >   CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> > -- 
> > 
> > Probably CONFIG_SLUB and CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG should be used.
> 
> Used your profile and this still does not happen :(

One obvious error is that nr_segments is computed wrong.

Yi, can you try the following patch?

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
index 881d28eb15e9..a393d99b74e1 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
@@ -239,9 +239,14 @@ static void nvme_tcp_init_iter(struct nvme_tcp_request *req,
 		offset = 0;
 	} else {
 		struct bio *bio = req->curr_bio;
+		struct bio_vec bv;
+		struct bvec_iter iter;
+
+		nsegs = 0;
+		bio_for_each_bvec(bv, bio, iter)
+			nsegs++;
 
 		vec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter);
-		nsegs = bio_segments(bio);
 		size = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
 		offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
 	}

-- 
Ming


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, Rachel Sibley <rasibley@redhat.com>,
	Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
	Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel null pointer at nvme_tcp_init_iter+0x7d/0xd0 [nvme_tcp]
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:21:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209042103.GB63798@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6147d452-a12e-c76c-22f1-5d9e7cb6b01d@grimberg.me>

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:42:28AM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> > > Hi Sagi
> > > 
> > > On 2/8/21 5:46 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hello
> > > > > 
> > > > > We found this kernel NULL pointer issue with latest
> > > > > linux-block/for-next and it's 100% reproduced, let me know
> > > > > if you need more info/testing, thanks
> > > > > 
> > > > > Kernel repo:
> > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
> > > > > Commit: 11f8b6fd0db9 - Merge branch 'for-5.12/io_uring' into for-next
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reproducer: blktests nvme-tcp/012
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for reporting Ming, I've tried to reproduce this on my VM
> > > > but did not succeed. Given that you have it 100% reproducible,
> > > > can you try to revert commit:
> > > > 
> > > > 0dc9edaf80ea nvme-tcp: pass multipage bvec to request iov_iter
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Revert this commit fixed the issue and I've attached the config. :)
> > 
> > Good to know,
> > 
> > I see some differences that I should probably change to hit this:
> > -- 
> > @@ -254,14 +256,15 @@ CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y
> >   # end of Kernel Performance Events And Counters
> > 
> >   CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS=y
> > +CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
> >   # CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set
> > -CONFIG_SLAB=y
> > -# CONFIG_SLUB is not set
> > -# CONFIG_SLOB is not set
> > -CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT=y
> > -# CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM is not set
> > +# CONFIG_SLAB is not set
> > +CONFIG_SLUB=y
> > +# CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT is not set
> > +CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM=y
> >   # CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED is not set
> > -# CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR is not set
> > +CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR=y
> > +CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL=y
> >   CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION=y
> >   CONFIG_PROFILING=y
> >   CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=y
> > @@ -299,7 +302,8 @@ CONFIG_HAVE_INTEL_TXT=y
> >   CONFIG_X86_64_SMP=y
> >   CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES=y
> >   CONFIG_FIX_EARLYCON_MEM=y
> > -CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=4
> > +CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK=y
> > +CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=5
> >   CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> > -- 
> > 
> > Probably CONFIG_SLUB and CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG should be used.
> 
> Used your profile and this still does not happen :(

One obvious error is that nr_segments is computed wrong.

Yi, can you try the following patch?

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
index 881d28eb15e9..a393d99b74e1 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
@@ -239,9 +239,14 @@ static void nvme_tcp_init_iter(struct nvme_tcp_request *req,
 		offset = 0;
 	} else {
 		struct bio *bio = req->curr_bio;
+		struct bio_vec bv;
+		struct bvec_iter iter;
+
+		nsegs = 0;
+		bio_for_each_bvec(bv, bio, iter)
+			nsegs++;
 
 		vec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter);
-		nsegs = bio_segments(bio);
 		size = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
 		offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
 	}

-- 
Ming


_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cki.F3E139361A.EN5MUSJKK9@redhat.com>
2021-02-06  3:08 ` kernel null pointer at nvme_tcp_init_iter+0x7d/0xd0 [nvme_tcp] Yi Zhang
2021-02-07  4:50   ` kernel null pointer at nvme_tcp_init_iter[nvme_tcp] with blktests nvme-tcp/012 Yi Zhang
2021-02-07  4:50     ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-07  5:25     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-07  5:25       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-08  6:48       ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-08  6:48         ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-07  5:48     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-07  5:48       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-07  5:58     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-07  5:58       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-07  7:14   ` kernel null pointer at nvme_tcp_init_iter+0x7d/0xd0 [nvme_tcp] Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-07  7:14     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-08  9:53     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08  9:53       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08  9:46   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08  9:46     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08 13:28     ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-08 17:54       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08 17:54         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08 18:42         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08 18:42           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09  4:21           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-02-09  4:21             ` Ming Lei
2021-02-09  7:21             ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09  7:21               ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09  7:50               ` Ming Lei
2021-02-09  7:50                 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-09  8:34                 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-09  8:34                   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-09 10:09                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 10:09                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 10:07                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 10:07                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 10:33                   ` Ming Lei
2021-02-09 10:33                     ` Ming Lei
2021-02-09 10:36                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 10:36                       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 10:25       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 10:25         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 12:57         ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-09 12:57           ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-09 18:01           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 18:01             ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-10  2:51             ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-10  2:51               ` Yi Zhang
2021-02-10  3:38               ` Keith Busch
2021-02-10  3:38                 ` Keith Busch
2021-02-10  5:03               ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-10  5:03                 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-10 22:06                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-10 22:06                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-10 22:15                   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-10 22:15                     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210209042103.GB63798@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rasibley@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.