[PATCH v5 00/19] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor

[PATCH v5 00/19] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor

[Mathieu Poirier]

Following the work done here [1], this set provides support for the
remoteproc core to release resources associated with a remote processor
without having to switch it off. That way a platform driver can be removed
or the application processor power cycled while the remote processor is
still operating.

Modifications for this revision are detailed in the changelog of each patch but
the main enhancement is the setup of a clean resource table when a remote
processor is detached from.

I have tested scenarios where the processor is detached and re-attached when
booted from an external entity and the remoteproc core.  I was also able
to confirm that removing the platform driver of a detached remote processor
works.  Re-attaching the remote processor after re-inserting the platorm driver
also works properly.

Applies cleanly on rproc-next (43d3f2c715ce). 

Thanks,
Mathieu

Arnaud POULIQUEN (1):
  remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing to rproc_ops

Mathieu Poirier (18):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindind to support autonomous processors
  remoteproc: Re-check state in rproc_shutdown()
  remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del()
  remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate()
  remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state
  remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state
  remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops
  remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops
  remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation
  remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach()
  remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach()
  remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table
  remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown()
  remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached
  remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached
  remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request when attached
  remoteproc: Properly deal with detach request
  remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path

 .../bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml  |  27 ++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c          |  32 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          | 307 ++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c    |  24 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |  10 +
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c         |  20 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c              | 168 +++++-----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h                    |  27 +-
 8 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 00/19] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor

[Mathieu Poirier]

Following the work done here [1], this set provides support for the
remoteproc core to release resources associated with a remote processor
without having to switch it off. That way a platform driver can be removed
or the application processor power cycled while the remote processor is
still operating.

Modifications for this revision are detailed in the changelog of each patch but
the main enhancement is the setup of a clean resource table when a remote
processor is detached from.

I have tested scenarios where the processor is detached and re-attached when
booted from an external entity and the remoteproc core.  I was also able
to confirm that removing the platform driver of a detached remote processor
works.  Re-attaching the remote processor after re-inserting the platorm driver
also works properly.

Applies cleanly on rproc-next (43d3f2c715ce). 

Thanks,
Mathieu

Arnaud POULIQUEN (1):
  remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing to rproc_ops

Mathieu Poirier (18):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindind to support autonomous processors
  remoteproc: Re-check state in rproc_shutdown()
  remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del()
  remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate()
  remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state
  remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state
  remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops
  remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops
  remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation
  remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach()
  remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach()
  remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table
  remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown()
  remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached
  remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached
  remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request when attached
  remoteproc: Properly deal with detach request
  remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path

 .../bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml  |  27 ++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c          |  32 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          | 307 ++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c    |  24 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |  10 +
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c         |  20 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c              | 168 +++++-----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h                    |  27 +-
 8 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml

-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 01/19] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindind to support autonomous processors

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch adds a binding to guide the remoteproc core on how to deal with
remote processors in two cases:

1) When an application holding a reference to a remote processor character
   device interface crashes.

2) when the platform driver for a remote processor is removed.

In both cases if "autonomous-on-core-reboot" is specified in the remote
processor DT node, the remoteproc core will detach the remote processor
rather than switching it off.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml  | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e8bb8ef9031a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Binding(s) for a primary processor applicable to all ancillary
+       processors
+
+maintainers:
+  - Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
+  - Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+
+description:
+  This document defines the bindings used by a primary processor to determine
+  the state it should leave an ancillary processor when the former is no longer
+  functioning.
+
+properties:
+  autonomous-on-core-reboot:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
+    description:
+      When specified the ancillary processor should be left operational when
+      the primary processor is no longer available.  Otherwise the ancillary
+      processor should be made inoperative.
+
+additionalProperties: true
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 01/19] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindind to support autonomous processors

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch adds a binding to guide the remoteproc core on how to deal with
remote processors in two cases:

1) When an application holding a reference to a remote processor character
   device interface crashes.

2) when the platform driver for a remote processor is removed.

In both cases if "autonomous-on-core-reboot" is specified in the remote
processor DT node, the remoteproc core will detach the remote processor
rather than switching it off.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml  | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e8bb8ef9031a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Binding(s) for a primary processor applicable to all ancillary
+       processors
+
+maintainers:
+  - Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
+  - Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
+
+description:
+  This document defines the bindings used by a primary processor to determine
+  the state it should leave an ancillary processor when the former is no longer
+  functioning.
+
+properties:
+  autonomous-on-core-reboot:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
+    description:
+      When specified the ancillary processor should be left operational when
+      the primary processor is no longer available.  Otherwise the ancillary
+      processor should be made inoperative.
+
+additionalProperties: true
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 02/19] remoteproc: Re-check state in rproc_shutdown()

[Mathieu Poirier]

The state of the remote processor may have changed between the
time a call to rproc_shutdown() was made and the time it is
executed.  To avoid moving forward with an operation that may
have been cancelled, recheck while holding the mutex.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 2394eef383e3..f1c097572e01 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1857,6 +1857,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		goto out;
+
 	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
 	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power))
 		goto out;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 02/19] remoteproc: Re-check state in rproc_shutdown()

[Mathieu Poirier]

The state of the remote processor may have changed between the
time a call to rproc_shutdown() was made and the time it is
executed.  To avoid moving forward with an operation that may
have been cancelled, recheck while holding the mutex.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 2394eef383e3..f1c097572e01 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1857,6 +1857,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		goto out;
+
 	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
 	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power))
 		goto out;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 03/19] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Whether started at probe() time or thereafter from the command
line, a remote processor needs to be shutdown before the final
cleanup phases can happen.  Otherwise the system may be left in
an unpredictable state where the remote processor is expecting
the remoteproc core to be providing services when in fact it
no longer exist.

Invariably calling rproc_shutdown() is fine since it will return
immediately if the remote processor has already been switched
off.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index f1c097572e01..86bd66955060 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2350,10 +2350,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (!rproc)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* if rproc is marked always-on, rproc_add() booted it */
 	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */
-	if (rproc->auto_boot)
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 
 	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
 	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 03/19] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Whether started at probe() time or thereafter from the command
line, a remote processor needs to be shutdown before the final
cleanup phases can happen.  Otherwise the system may be left in
an unpredictable state where the remote processor is expecting
the remoteproc core to be providing services when in fact it
no longer exist.

Invariably calling rproc_shutdown() is fine since it will return
immediately if the remote processor has already been switched
off.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index f1c097572e01..86bd66955060 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2350,10 +2350,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (!rproc)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* if rproc is marked always-on, rproc_add() booted it */
 	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */
-	if (rproc->auto_boot)
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 
 	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
 	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 04/19] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Rename function rproc_actuate() to rproc_attach().  That way it is
easy to understand that it does the opposite of rproc_detach().

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 86bd66955060..8afc7e1bd28a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int __rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1541,7 +1541,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
  * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
  * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
  */
-static int rproc_actuate(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ static int rproc_actuate(struct rproc *rproc)
 		goto clean_up_resources;
 	}
 
-	ret = rproc_attach(rproc);
+	ret = __rproc_attach(rproc);
 	if (ret)
 		goto clean_up_resources;
 
@@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) {
 		dev_info(dev, "attaching to %s\n", rproc->name);
 
-		ret = rproc_actuate(rproc);
+		ret = rproc_attach(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_info(dev, "powering up %s\n", rproc->name);
 
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 04/19] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Rename function rproc_actuate() to rproc_attach().  That way it is
easy to understand that it does the opposite of rproc_detach().

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 86bd66955060..8afc7e1bd28a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int __rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1541,7 +1541,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
  * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
  * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
  */
-static int rproc_actuate(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ static int rproc_actuate(struct rproc *rproc)
 		goto clean_up_resources;
 	}
 
-	ret = rproc_attach(rproc);
+	ret = __rproc_attach(rproc);
 	if (ret)
 		goto clean_up_resources;
 
@@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) {
 		dev_info(dev, "attaching to %s\n", rproc->name);
 
-		ret = rproc_actuate(rproc);
+		ret = rproc_attach(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_info(dev, "powering up %s\n", rproc->name);
 
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 05/19] remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add a new RPROC_ATTACHED state to take into account scenarios
where the remoteproc core needs to attach to a remote processor
that is booted by another entity.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 1 +
 include/linux/remoteproc.h            | 7 +++++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 1dbef895e65e..4b4aab0d4c4b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static const char * const rproc_state_string[] = {
 	[RPROC_RUNNING]		= "running",
 	[RPROC_CRASHED]		= "crashed",
 	[RPROC_DELETED]		= "deleted",
+	[RPROC_ATTACHED]	= "attached",
 	[RPROC_DETACHED]	= "detached",
 	[RPROC_LAST]		= "invalid",
 };
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index f28ee75d1005..b0a57ff73849 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -405,6 +405,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
  * @RPROC_RUNNING:	device is up and running
  * @RPROC_CRASHED:	device has crashed; need to start recovery
  * @RPROC_DELETED:	device is deleted
+ * @RPROC_ATTACHED:	device has been booted by another entity and the core
+ *			has attached to it
  * @RPROC_DETACHED:	device has been booted by another entity and waiting
  *			for the core to attach to it
  * @RPROC_LAST:		just keep this one at the end
@@ -421,8 +423,9 @@ enum rproc_state {
 	RPROC_RUNNING	= 2,
 	RPROC_CRASHED	= 3,
 	RPROC_DELETED	= 4,
-	RPROC_DETACHED	= 5,
-	RPROC_LAST	= 6,
+	RPROC_ATTACHED	= 5,
+	RPROC_DETACHED	= 6,
+	RPROC_LAST	= 7,
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 05/19] remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add a new RPROC_ATTACHED state to take into account scenarios
where the remoteproc core needs to attach to a remote processor
that is booted by another entity.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 1 +
 include/linux/remoteproc.h            | 7 +++++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 1dbef895e65e..4b4aab0d4c4b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static const char * const rproc_state_string[] = {
 	[RPROC_RUNNING]		= "running",
 	[RPROC_CRASHED]		= "crashed",
 	[RPROC_DELETED]		= "deleted",
+	[RPROC_ATTACHED]	= "attached",
 	[RPROC_DETACHED]	= "detached",
 	[RPROC_LAST]		= "invalid",
 };
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index f28ee75d1005..b0a57ff73849 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -405,6 +405,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
  * @RPROC_RUNNING:	device is up and running
  * @RPROC_CRASHED:	device has crashed; need to start recovery
  * @RPROC_DELETED:	device is deleted
+ * @RPROC_ATTACHED:	device has been booted by another entity and the core
+ *			has attached to it
  * @RPROC_DETACHED:	device has been booted by another entity and waiting
  *			for the core to attach to it
  * @RPROC_LAST:		just keep this one at the end
@@ -421,8 +423,9 @@ enum rproc_state {
 	RPROC_RUNNING	= 2,
 	RPROC_CRASHED	= 3,
 	RPROC_DELETED	= 4,
-	RPROC_DETACHED	= 5,
-	RPROC_LAST	= 6,
+	RPROC_ATTACHED	= 5,
+	RPROC_DETACHED	= 6,
+	RPROC_LAST	= 7,
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 06/19] remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state

[Mathieu Poirier]

There is a need to know when a remote processor has been attached
to rather than booted by the remoteproc core.  In order to avoid
manipulating two variables, i.e rproc::autonomous and
rproc::state, get rid of the former and simply use the newly
introduced RPROC_ATTACHED state.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c  | 20 +-------------------
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c |  5 +----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h            |  2 --
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 8afc7e1bd28a..e6606d10a4c8 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static int __rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		goto stop_rproc;
 	}
 
-	rproc->state = RPROC_RUNNING;
+	rproc->state = RPROC_ATTACHED;
 
 	dev_info(dev, "remote processor %s is now attached\n", rproc->name);
 
@@ -1659,14 +1659,6 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 
 	rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
 
-	/*
-	 * The remote processor has been stopped and is now offline, which means
-	 * that the next time it is brought back online the remoteproc core will
-	 * be responsible to load its firmware.  As such it is no longer
-	 * autonomous.
-	 */
-	rproc->autonomous = false;
-
 	dev_info(dev, "stopped remote processor %s\n", rproc->name);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2080,16 +2072,6 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Remind ourselves the remote processor has been attached to rather
-	 * than booted by the remoteproc core.  This is important because the
-	 * RPROC_DETACHED state will be lost as soon as the remote processor
-	 * has been attached to.  Used in firmware_show() and reset in
-	 * rproc_stop().
-	 */
-	if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
-		rproc->autonomous = true;
-
 	/* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
 	if (rproc->auto_boot) {
 		ret = rproc_trigger_auto_boot(rproc);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 4b4aab0d4c4b..f9694def9b54 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -138,11 +138,8 @@ static ssize_t firmware_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 	 * If the remote processor has been started by an external
 	 * entity we have no idea of what image it is running.  As such
 	 * simply display a generic string rather then rproc->firmware.
-	 *
-	 * Here we rely on the autonomous flag because a remote processor
-	 * may have been attached to and currently in a running state.
 	 */
-	if (rproc->autonomous)
+	if (rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
 		firmware = "unknown";
 
 	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", firmware);
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index b0a57ff73849..6b0a0ed30a03 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
  * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
  * @auto_boot: flag to indicate if remote processor should be auto-started
- * @autonomous: true if an external entity has booted the remote processor
  * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
  * @char_dev: character device of the rproc
@@ -549,7 +548,6 @@ struct rproc {
 	size_t table_sz;
 	bool has_iommu;
 	bool auto_boot;
-	bool autonomous;
 	struct list_head dump_segments;
 	int nb_vdev;
 	u8 elf_class;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 06/19] remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state

[Mathieu Poirier]

There is a need to know when a remote processor has been attached
to rather than booted by the remoteproc core.  In order to avoid
manipulating two variables, i.e rproc::autonomous and
rproc::state, get rid of the former and simply use the newly
introduced RPROC_ATTACHED state.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c  | 20 +-------------------
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c |  5 +----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h            |  2 --
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 8afc7e1bd28a..e6606d10a4c8 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static int __rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		goto stop_rproc;
 	}
 
-	rproc->state = RPROC_RUNNING;
+	rproc->state = RPROC_ATTACHED;
 
 	dev_info(dev, "remote processor %s is now attached\n", rproc->name);
 
@@ -1659,14 +1659,6 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 
 	rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
 
-	/*
-	 * The remote processor has been stopped and is now offline, which means
-	 * that the next time it is brought back online the remoteproc core will
-	 * be responsible to load its firmware.  As such it is no longer
-	 * autonomous.
-	 */
-	rproc->autonomous = false;
-
 	dev_info(dev, "stopped remote processor %s\n", rproc->name);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2080,16 +2072,6 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Remind ourselves the remote processor has been attached to rather
-	 * than booted by the remoteproc core.  This is important because the
-	 * RPROC_DETACHED state will be lost as soon as the remote processor
-	 * has been attached to.  Used in firmware_show() and reset in
-	 * rproc_stop().
-	 */
-	if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
-		rproc->autonomous = true;
-
 	/* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
 	if (rproc->auto_boot) {
 		ret = rproc_trigger_auto_boot(rproc);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 4b4aab0d4c4b..f9694def9b54 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -138,11 +138,8 @@ static ssize_t firmware_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 	 * If the remote processor has been started by an external
 	 * entity we have no idea of what image it is running.  As such
 	 * simply display a generic string rather then rproc->firmware.
-	 *
-	 * Here we rely on the autonomous flag because a remote processor
-	 * may have been attached to and currently in a running state.
 	 */
-	if (rproc->autonomous)
+	if (rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
 		firmware = "unknown";
 
 	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", firmware);
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index b0a57ff73849..6b0a0ed30a03 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
  * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
  * @auto_boot: flag to indicate if remote processor should be auto-started
- * @autonomous: true if an external entity has booted the remote processor
  * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
  * @char_dev: character device of the rproc
@@ -549,7 +548,6 @@ struct rproc {
 	size_t table_sz;
 	bool has_iommu;
 	bool auto_boot;
-	bool autonomous;
 	struct list_head dump_segments;
 	int nb_vdev;
 	u8 elf_class;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 07/19] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
and detaches from it.  When re-attaching to the remote processor,
the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
in memory.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
New for V5:
- Added function rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() to keep rproc_attach() clean.
- Setting ->cached_table, ->table_ptr and ->table_sz in the remoteproc core
  rather than the platform drivers.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 +++++++
 include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 +++-
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index e6606d10a4c8..741bc20de437 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	size_t table_sz;
+	int ret;
+
+	table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(table_ptr)) {
+		if (!table_ptr)
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		else
+			ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
+
+		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
+	 * to work with a cached table.
+	 */
+	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
+	rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
  * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
@@ -1556,6 +1585,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
+		goto disable_iommu;
+	}
+
 	/* reset max_notifyid */
 	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
@@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline
+struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
+						  size_t *size)
+{
+	if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
+		return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static inline
 bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
  * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
  * negative value on error
  * @load_rsc_table:	load resource table from firmware image
- * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
+ * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
+ * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
+ *			  by external entity
  * @load:		load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
  *			expects to find it
  * @sanity_check:	sanity check the fw image
@@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
 			  int offset, int avail);
 	struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
 				struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
+	struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
+				struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
 	int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
 	int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
 	u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 07/19] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
and detaches from it.  When re-attaching to the remote processor,
the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
in memory.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
New for V5:
- Added function rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() to keep rproc_attach() clean.
- Setting ->cached_table, ->table_ptr and ->table_sz in the remoteproc core
  rather than the platform drivers.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 +++++++
 include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 +++-
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index e6606d10a4c8..741bc20de437 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	size_t table_sz;
+	int ret;
+
+	table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(table_ptr)) {
+		if (!table_ptr)
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		else
+			ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
+
+		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
+	 * to work with a cached table.
+	 */
+	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
+	rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
  * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
@@ -1556,6 +1585,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
+		goto disable_iommu;
+	}
+
 	/* reset max_notifyid */
 	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
@@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline
+struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
+						  size_t *size)
+{
+	if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
+		return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static inline
 bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
  * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
  * negative value on error
  * @load_rsc_table:	load resource table from firmware image
- * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
+ * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
+ * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
+ *			  by external entity
  * @load:		load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
  *			expects to find it
  * @sanity_check:	sanity check the fw image
@@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
 			  int offset, int avail);
 	struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
 				struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
+	struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
+				struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
 	int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
 	int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
 	u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 07/19] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

Hi Mathieu,

On 2/12/21 12:46 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
> scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
> and detaches from it.  When re-attaching to the remote processor,
> the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
> in memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
> New for V5:
> - Added function rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() to keep rproc_attach() clean.
> - Setting ->cached_table, ->table_ptr and ->table_sz in the remoteproc core
>   rather than the platform drivers.
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 +++++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 +++-
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index e6606d10a4c8..741bc20de437 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> +	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> +	size_t table_sz;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(table_ptr)) {
> +		if (!table_ptr)
> +			ret = -EINVAL;

I did few tests on this showing that this approach does not cover all use cases.

The first one is a firmware without resource table. In this case table_ptr
should be null, or we have to consider the -ENOENT error as a non error usecase.

The second one, more tricky, is a firmware started by the remoteproc framework.
In this case the resource table address is retrieved from the ELF file by the
core part.
So if we detach and reattach rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table cannot return the
address. Look to me that we should have also an alocation of the clean_table in
rproc_start and then to keep the memory allocated until a shutdown.

That said regarding the complexity to re-attach, I wonder if it would not be
better to focus first on a simple detach, and address the reattachment in a
separate series, to move forward in stages.

Regards,
Arnaud

> +		else
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
> +
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
> +	 * to work with a cached table.
> +	 */
> +	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
> +	rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
>   * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> @@ -1556,6 +1585,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto disable_iommu;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* reset max_notifyid */
>  	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static inline
> +struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> +						  size_t *size)
> +{
> +	if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
> +		return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static inline
>  bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>   * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
>   * negative value on error
>   * @load_rsc_table:	load resource table from firmware image
> - * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
> + * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
> + * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
> + *			  by external entity
>   * @load:		load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
>   *			expects to find it
>   * @sanity_check:	sanity check the fw image
> @@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
>  			  int offset, int avail);
>  	struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
>  				struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> +	struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
> +				struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
>  	int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>  	int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>  	u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 07/19] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

Hi Mathieu,

On 2/12/21 12:46 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
> scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
> and detaches from it.  When re-attaching to the remote processor,
> the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
> in memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
> New for V5:
> - Added function rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() to keep rproc_attach() clean.
> - Setting ->cached_table, ->table_ptr and ->table_sz in the remoteproc core
>   rather than the platform drivers.
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 +++++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 +++-
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index e6606d10a4c8..741bc20de437 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> +	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> +	size_t table_sz;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(table_ptr)) {
> +		if (!table_ptr)
> +			ret = -EINVAL;

I did few tests on this showing that this approach does not cover all use cases.

The first one is a firmware without resource table. In this case table_ptr
should be null, or we have to consider the -ENOENT error as a non error usecase.

The second one, more tricky, is a firmware started by the remoteproc framework.
In this case the resource table address is retrieved from the ELF file by the
core part.
So if we detach and reattach rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table cannot return the
address. Look to me that we should have also an alocation of the clean_table in
rproc_start and then to keep the memory allocated until a shutdown.

That said regarding the complexity to re-attach, I wonder if it would not be
better to focus first on a simple detach, and address the reattachment in a
separate series, to move forward in stages.

Regards,
Arnaud

> +		else
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
> +
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
> +	 * to work with a cached table.
> +	 */
> +	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
> +	rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
>   * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> @@ -1556,6 +1585,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto disable_iommu;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* reset max_notifyid */
>  	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static inline
> +struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> +						  size_t *size)
> +{
> +	if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
> +		return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static inline
>  bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>   * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
>   * negative value on error
>   * @load_rsc_table:	load resource table from firmware image
> - * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
> + * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
> + * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
> + *			  by external entity
>   * @load:		load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
>   *			expects to find it
>   * @sanity_check:	sanity check the fw image
> @@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
>  			  int offset, int avail);
>  	struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
>  				struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> +	struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
> +				struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
>  	int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>  	int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>  	u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 07/19] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 02:10:10PM +0100, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> On 2/12/21 12:46 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
> > scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
> > and detaches from it.  When re-attaching to the remote processor,
> > the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
> > in memory.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > New for V5:
> > - Added function rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() to keep rproc_attach() clean.
> > - Setting ->cached_table, ->table_ptr and ->table_sz in the remoteproc core
> >   rather than the platform drivers.
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 +++++++
> >  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 +++-
> >  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index e6606d10a4c8..741bc20de437 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > +	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> > +	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > +	size_t table_sz;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
> > +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(table_ptr)) {
> > +		if (!table_ptr)
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> I did few tests on this showing that this approach does not cover all use cases.
> 
> The first one is a firmware without resource table. In this case table_ptr
> should be null, or we have to consider the -ENOENT error as a non error usecase.
>

Right, I'll provision for those cases.
 
> The second one, more tricky, is a firmware started by the remoteproc framework.
> In this case the resource table address is retrieved from the ELF file by the
> core part.

Correct.

> So if we detach and reattach rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table cannot return the
> address. Look to me that we should have also an alocation of the clean_table in
> rproc_start and then to keep the memory allocated until a shutdown.

I assumed the address of the resource table found in the ELF image was the same
as the one known by the platform driver.  In hindsight I realise the platform
driver may not know that address.

> 
> That said regarding the complexity to re-attach, I wonder if it would not be
> better to focus first on a simple detach, and address the reattachment in a
> separate series, to move forward in stages.

I agree that OFFLINE -> RUNNING -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED is introducing some
complexity related to the management of the resource table that where not
expected.  We could concentrate on a simple detach and see where that takes us.
It would also mean to get rid of the "autonomous-on-core-shutdown" DT binding. 

Thanks,
Mathieu

> 
> Regards,
> Arnaud
> 
> > +		else
> > +			ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
> > +
> > +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
> > +	 * to work with a cached table.
> > +	 */
> > +	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> > +	rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
> > +	rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
> >   * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> > @@ -1556,6 +1585,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > +		goto disable_iommu;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* reset max_notifyid */
> >  	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline
> > +struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > +						  size_t *size)
> > +{
> > +	if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
> > +		return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
> > +
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline
> >  bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> >   * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
> >   * negative value on error
> >   * @load_rsc_table:	load resource table from firmware image
> > - * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
> > + * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
> > + * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
> > + *			  by external entity
> >   * @load:		load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
> >   *			expects to find it
> >   * @sanity_check:	sanity check the fw image
> > @@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
> >  			  int offset, int avail);
> >  	struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
> >  				struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > +	struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
> > +				struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
> >  	int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> >  	int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> >  	u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > 

Re: [PATCH v5 07/19] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 02:10:10PM +0100, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> On 2/12/21 12:46 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Add a new get_loaded_rsc_table() operation in order to support
> > scenarios where the remoteproc core has booted a remote processor
> > and detaches from it.  When re-attaching to the remote processor,
> > the core needs to know where the resource table has been placed
> > in memory.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > New for V5:
> > - Added function rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() to keep rproc_attach() clean.
> > - Setting ->cached_table, ->table_ptr and ->table_sz in the remoteproc core
> >   rather than the platform drivers.
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 +++++++
> >  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  6 +++-
> >  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index e6606d10a4c8..741bc20de437 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -1537,6 +1537,35 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > +	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> > +	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > +	size_t table_sz;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	table_ptr = rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz);
> > +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(table_ptr)) {
> > +		if (!table_ptr)
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> I did few tests on this showing that this approach does not cover all use cases.
> 
> The first one is a firmware without resource table. In this case table_ptr
> should be null, or we have to consider the -ENOENT error as a non error usecase.
>

Right, I'll provision for those cases.
 
> The second one, more tricky, is a firmware started by the remoteproc framework.
> In this case the resource table address is retrieved from the ELF file by the
> core part.

Correct.

> So if we detach and reattach rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table cannot return the
> address. Look to me that we should have also an alocation of the clean_table in
> rproc_start and then to keep the memory allocated until a shutdown.

I assumed the address of the resource table found in the ELF image was the same
as the one known by the platform driver.  In hindsight I realise the platform
driver may not know that address.

> 
> That said regarding the complexity to re-attach, I wonder if it would not be
> better to focus first on a simple detach, and address the reattachment in a
> separate series, to move forward in stages.

I agree that OFFLINE -> RUNNING -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED is introducing some
complexity related to the management of the resource table that where not
expected.  We could concentrate on a simple detach and see where that takes us.
It would also mean to get rid of the "autonomous-on-core-shutdown" DT binding. 

Thanks,
Mathieu

> 
> Regards,
> Arnaud
> 
> > +		else
> > +			ret = PTR_ERR(table_ptr);
> > +
> > +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
> > +	 * to work with a cached table.
> > +	 */
> > +	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> > +	rproc->table_ptr = table_ptr;
> > +	rproc->table_sz = table_sz;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
> >   * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> > @@ -1556,6 +1585,12 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > +		goto disable_iommu;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* reset max_notifyid */
> >  	rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index c34002888d2c..4f73aac7e60d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline
> > +struct resource_table *rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > +						  size_t *size)
> > +{
> > +	if (rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table)
> > +		return rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, size);
> > +
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline
> >  bool rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(u64 val)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index 6b0a0ed30a03..51538a7d120d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> >   * RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled and a
> >   * negative value on error
> >   * @load_rsc_table:	load resource table from firmware image
> > - * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resouce table
> > + * @find_loaded_rsc_table: find the loaded resource table from firmware image
> > + * @get_loaded_rsc_table: get resource table installed in memory
> > + *			  by external entity
> >   * @load:		load firmware to memory, where the remote processor
> >   *			expects to find it
> >   * @sanity_check:	sanity check the fw image
> > @@ -390,6 +392,8 @@ struct rproc_ops {
> >  			  int offset, int avail);
> >  	struct resource_table *(*find_loaded_rsc_table)(
> >  				struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > +	struct resource_table *(*get_loaded_rsc_table)(
> > +				struct rproc *rproc, size_t *size);
> >  	int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> >  	int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> >  	u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 08/19] remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

Move the setting of the resource table installed by an external
entity to rproc_ops::get_loaded_rsc_table().  This is to support
scenarios where a remote processor has been started by the core
but is detached at a later stage.  To re-attach the remote
processor, the address of the resource table needs to be available
at a later time than the platform driver's probe() function.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
New for V5:
- stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table() now returns a resource table pointer.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index a180aeae9675..826cb7a045df 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -541,6 +541,73 @@ static void stm32_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
 	}
 }
 
+static int stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(struct rproc *rproc,
+				u64 da, phys_addr_t *pa)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mem;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ddata->nb_rmems; i++) {
+		p_mem = &ddata->rmems[i];
+
+		if (da < p_mem->dev_addr ||
+		    da >= p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->size)
+			continue;
+
+		*pa = da - p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->bus_addr;
+		dev_dbg(dev, "da %llx to pa %#x\n", da, *pa);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	dev_err(dev, "can't translate da %llx\n", da);
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static struct resource_table *
+stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	phys_addr_t rsc_pa;
+	u32 rsc_da;
+	int err;
+
+	/* The resource table has already been mapped, nothing to do */
+	if (ddata->rsc_va)
+		goto done;
+
+	err = regmap_read(ddata->rsctbl.map, ddata->rsctbl.reg, &rsc_da);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to read rsc tbl addr\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
+	if (!rsc_da)
+		/* no rsc table */
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+	err = stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(rproc, rsc_da, &rsc_pa);
+	if (err)
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+
+	ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
+			&rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
+		ddata->rsc_va = NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
+done:
+	/* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */
+	*table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE;
+	return (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
+}
+
 static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
 	.start		= stm32_rproc_start,
 	.stop		= stm32_rproc_stop,
@@ -549,6 +616,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
 	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
 	.parse_fw	= stm32_rproc_parse_fw,
 	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
+	.get_loaded_rsc_table = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
 	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
 	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
 };
@@ -692,75 +760,6 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
 	return regmap_read(ddata->m4_state.map, ddata->m4_state.reg, state);
 }
 
-static int stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
-				u64 da, phys_addr_t *pa)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mem;
-	unsigned int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ddata->nb_rmems; i++) {
-		p_mem = &ddata->rmems[i];
-
-		if (da < p_mem->dev_addr ||
-		    da >= p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->size)
-			continue;
-
-		*pa = da - p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->bus_addr;
-		dev_dbg(dev, "da %llx to pa %#x\n", da, *pa);
-
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	dev_err(dev, "can't translate da %llx\n", da);
-
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-
-static int stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
-					    struct rproc *rproc,
-					    struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	phys_addr_t rsc_pa;
-	u32 rsc_da;
-	int err;
-
-	err = regmap_read(ddata->rsctbl.map, ddata->rsctbl.reg, &rsc_da);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to read rsc tbl addr\n");
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	if (!rsc_da)
-		/* no rsc table */
-		return 0;
-
-	err = stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(pdev, ddata, rsc_da, &rsc_pa);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
-	ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
-			&rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
-		ddata->rsc_va = NULL;
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
-	 * to work with a cached table.
-	 */
-	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
-	/* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */
-	rproc->table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE;
-	rproc->table_ptr = (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -800,10 +799,6 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
 		if (ret)
 			goto free_resources;
-
-		ret = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(pdev, rproc, ddata);
-		if (ret)
-			goto free_resources;
 	}
 
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 08/19] remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

Move the setting of the resource table installed by an external
entity to rproc_ops::get_loaded_rsc_table().  This is to support
scenarios where a remote processor has been started by the core
but is detached at a later stage.  To re-attach the remote
processor, the address of the resource table needs to be available
at a later time than the platform driver's probe() function.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
New for V5:
- stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table() now returns a resource table pointer.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index a180aeae9675..826cb7a045df 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -541,6 +541,73 @@ static void stm32_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
 	}
 }
 
+static int stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(struct rproc *rproc,
+				u64 da, phys_addr_t *pa)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mem;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ddata->nb_rmems; i++) {
+		p_mem = &ddata->rmems[i];
+
+		if (da < p_mem->dev_addr ||
+		    da >= p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->size)
+			continue;
+
+		*pa = da - p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->bus_addr;
+		dev_dbg(dev, "da %llx to pa %#x\n", da, *pa);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	dev_err(dev, "can't translate da %llx\n", da);
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static struct resource_table *
+stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	phys_addr_t rsc_pa;
+	u32 rsc_da;
+	int err;
+
+	/* The resource table has already been mapped, nothing to do */
+	if (ddata->rsc_va)
+		goto done;
+
+	err = regmap_read(ddata->rsctbl.map, ddata->rsctbl.reg, &rsc_da);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to read rsc tbl addr\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
+	if (!rsc_da)
+		/* no rsc table */
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+	err = stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(rproc, rsc_da, &rsc_pa);
+	if (err)
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+
+	ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
+			&rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
+		ddata->rsc_va = NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
+done:
+	/* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */
+	*table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE;
+	return (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
+}
+
 static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
 	.start		= stm32_rproc_start,
 	.stop		= stm32_rproc_stop,
@@ -549,6 +616,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
 	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
 	.parse_fw	= stm32_rproc_parse_fw,
 	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
+	.get_loaded_rsc_table = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
 	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
 	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
 };
@@ -692,75 +760,6 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
 	return regmap_read(ddata->m4_state.map, ddata->m4_state.reg, state);
 }
 
-static int stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
-				u64 da, phys_addr_t *pa)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mem;
-	unsigned int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ddata->nb_rmems; i++) {
-		p_mem = &ddata->rmems[i];
-
-		if (da < p_mem->dev_addr ||
-		    da >= p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->size)
-			continue;
-
-		*pa = da - p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->bus_addr;
-		dev_dbg(dev, "da %llx to pa %#x\n", da, *pa);
-
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	dev_err(dev, "can't translate da %llx\n", da);
-
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-
-static int stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
-					    struct rproc *rproc,
-					    struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	phys_addr_t rsc_pa;
-	u32 rsc_da;
-	int err;
-
-	err = regmap_read(ddata->rsctbl.map, ddata->rsctbl.reg, &rsc_da);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to read rsc tbl addr\n");
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	if (!rsc_da)
-		/* no rsc table */
-		return 0;
-
-	err = stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(pdev, ddata, rsc_da, &rsc_pa);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
-	ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
-			&rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
-		ddata->rsc_va = NULL;
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
-	 * to work with a cached table.
-	 */
-	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
-	/* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */
-	rproc->table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE;
-	rproc->table_ptr = (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -800,10 +799,6 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
 		if (ret)
 			goto free_resources;
-
-		ret = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(pdev, rproc, ddata);
-		if (ret)
-			goto free_resources;
 	}
 
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 09/19] remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>

Some actions such as memory resources reallocation are needed when
trying to reattach a co-processor. Use the prepare() operation for
these actions.

Co-developed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c     | 27 ++++++---------------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 741bc20de437..5c52c612a7f0 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1585,10 +1585,17 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/* Do anything that is needed to boot the remote processor */
+	ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
+		goto disable_iommu;
+	}
+
 	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iommu;
+		goto unprepare_device;
 	}
 
 	/* reset max_notifyid */
@@ -1605,7 +1612,7 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 	ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc_loading_handlers);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to process resources: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iommu;
+		goto unprepare_device;
 	}
 
 	/* Allocate carveout resources associated to rproc */
@@ -1624,6 +1631,9 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 clean_up_resources:
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
+unprepare_device:
+	/* release HW resources if needed */
+	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
 disable_iommu:
 	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
 	return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 826cb7a045df..6f0bb54dec15 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -207,16 +207,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(struct rproc *rproc, const unsigned char *name)
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
-					  const struct firmware *fw)
-{
-	if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
-		dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -274,12 +265,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 {
-	int ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
-
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
+		dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
 
-	return stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t stm32_rproc_wdg(int irq, void *data)
@@ -609,6 +598,7 @@ stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
 }
 
 static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
+	.prepare	= stm32_rproc_prepare,
 	.start		= stm32_rproc_start,
 	.stop		= stm32_rproc_stop,
 	.attach		= stm32_rproc_attach,
@@ -793,14 +783,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_rproc;
 
-	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN) {
+	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
 		rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
 
-		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
-		if (ret)
-			goto free_resources;
-	}
-
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
 	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
 	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 09/19] remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing to rproc_ops

[Mathieu Poirier]

From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>

Some actions such as memory resources reallocation are needed when
trying to reattach a co-processor. Use the prepare() operation for
these actions.

Co-developed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c     | 27 ++++++---------------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 741bc20de437..5c52c612a7f0 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1585,10 +1585,17 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/* Do anything that is needed to boot the remote processor */
+	ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
+		goto disable_iommu;
+	}
+
 	ret = rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "can't load resource table: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iommu;
+		goto unprepare_device;
 	}
 
 	/* reset max_notifyid */
@@ -1605,7 +1612,7 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 	ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc_loading_handlers);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to process resources: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iommu;
+		goto unprepare_device;
 	}
 
 	/* Allocate carveout resources associated to rproc */
@@ -1624,6 +1631,9 @@ static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 clean_up_resources:
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
+unprepare_device:
+	/* release HW resources if needed */
+	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
 disable_iommu:
 	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
 	return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 826cb7a045df..6f0bb54dec15 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -207,16 +207,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(struct rproc *rproc, const unsigned char *name)
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
-					  const struct firmware *fw)
-{
-	if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
-		dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -274,12 +265,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 {
-	int ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
-
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
+		dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
 
-	return stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t stm32_rproc_wdg(int irq, void *data)
@@ -609,6 +598,7 @@ stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
 }
 
 static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
+	.prepare	= stm32_rproc_prepare,
 	.start		= stm32_rproc_start,
 	.stop		= stm32_rproc_stop,
 	.attach		= stm32_rproc_attach,
@@ -793,14 +783,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_rproc;
 
-	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN) {
+	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
 		rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
 
-		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
-		if (ret)
-			goto free_resources;
-	}
-
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
 	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
 	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 10/19] remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add an new detach() operation in order to support scenarios where
the remoteproc core is going away but the remote processor is
kept operating.  This could be the case when the system is
rebooted or when the platform driver is removed.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 51538a7d120d..eff55ec72e80 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
  * @start:	power on the device and boot it
  * @stop:	power off the device
  * @attach:	attach to a device that his already powered up
+ * @detach:	detach from a device, leaving it powered up
  * @kick:	kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
  * @da_to_va:	optional platform hook to perform address translations
  * @parse_fw:	parse firmware to extract information (e.g. resource table)
@@ -385,6 +386,7 @@ struct rproc_ops {
 	int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
 	int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
 	int (*attach)(struct rproc *rproc);
+	int (*detach)(struct rproc *rproc);
 	void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
 	void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len);
 	int (*parse_fw)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 10/19] remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add an new detach() operation in order to support scenarios where
the remoteproc core is going away but the remote processor is
kept operating.  This could be the case when the system is
rebooted or when the platform driver is removed.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 51538a7d120d..eff55ec72e80 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
  * @start:	power on the device and boot it
  * @stop:	power off the device
  * @attach:	attach to a device that his already powered up
+ * @detach:	detach from a device, leaving it powered up
  * @kick:	kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
  * @da_to_va:	optional platform hook to perform address translations
  * @parse_fw:	parse firmware to extract information (e.g. resource table)
@@ -385,6 +386,7 @@ struct rproc_ops {
 	int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
 	int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
 	int (*attach)(struct rproc *rproc);
+	int (*detach)(struct rproc *rproc);
 	void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
 	void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len);
 	int (*parse_fw)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 11/19] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Introduce function __rproc_detach() to perform the same kind of
operation as rproc_stop(), but instead of switching off the
remote processor using rproc->ops->stop(), it uses
rproc->ops->detach().  That way it is possible for the core
to release the resources associated with a remote processor while
the latter is kept operating.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
New for V5:
- Removed fancy error recovery when ops->detach() fails to replicate what is
  done in rproc->stop().
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 5c52c612a7f0..b150138542d4 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1709,6 +1709,36 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * __rproc_detach(): Does the opposite of __rproc_attach()
+ */
+static int __maybe_unused __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* No need to continue if a detach() operation has not been provided */
+	if (!rproc->ops->detach)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Stop any subdevices for the remote processor */
+	rproc_stop_subdevices(rproc, false);
+
+	/* Tell the remote processor the core isn't available anymore */
+	ret = rproc->ops->detach(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't detach from rproc: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc);
+
+	rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
+
+	dev_info(dev, "detached remote processor %s\n", rproc->name);
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 /**
  * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 11/19] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Introduce function __rproc_detach() to perform the same kind of
operation as rproc_stop(), but instead of switching off the
remote processor using rproc->ops->stop(), it uses
rproc->ops->detach().  That way it is possible for the core
to release the resources associated with a remote processor while
the latter is kept operating.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
New for V5:
- Removed fancy error recovery when ops->detach() fails to replicate what is
  done in rproc->stop().
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 5c52c612a7f0..b150138542d4 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1709,6 +1709,36 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * __rproc_detach(): Does the opposite of __rproc_attach()
+ */
+static int __maybe_unused __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* No need to continue if a detach() operation has not been provided */
+	if (!rproc->ops->detach)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Stop any subdevices for the remote processor */
+	rproc_stop_subdevices(rproc, false);
+
+	/* Tell the remote processor the core isn't available anymore */
+	ret = rproc->ops->detach(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't detach from rproc: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc);
+
+	rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
+
+	dev_info(dev, "detached remote processor %s\n", rproc->name);
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 /**
  * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 12/19] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Introduce function rproc_detach() to enable the remoteproc
core to release the resources associated with a remote processor
without stopping its operation.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
New for V5:
- Fixed comment about rproc_actuate() that no longer exists.
- Added call to rproc_unprepare_device() to balance rproc_prepare_device() in
  function rproc_attach().
- Removed RB from Peng and Arnaud because of the above.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  1 +
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index b150138542d4..660dcc002ff6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 /*
  * __rproc_detach(): Does the opposite of __rproc_attach()
  */
-static int __maybe_unused __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1954,6 +1954,70 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
 
+/**
+ * rproc_detach() - Detach the remote processor from the
+ * remoteproc core
+ *
+ * @rproc: the remote processor
+ *
+ * Detach a remote processor (previously attached to with rproc_attach()).
+ *
+ * In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
+ * this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
+ * without disconnecting the device.
+ *
+ * Function rproc_detach() calls __rproc_detach() in order to let a remote
+ * processor know that services provided by the application processor are
+ * no longer available.  From there it should be possible to remove the
+ * platform driver and even power cycle the application processor (if the HW
+ * supports it) without needing to switch off the remote processor.
+ */
+int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
+		ret = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* clean up all acquired resources */
+	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
+
+	/* release HW resources if needed */
+	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+
+	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
+
+	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
+	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_detach);
+
 /**
  * rproc_get_by_phandle() - find a remote processor by phandle
  * @phandle: phandle to the rproc
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index eff55ec72e80..e1c843c19cc6 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
 
 int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc);
 void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
+int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_set_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, const char *fw_name);
 void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type);
 void rproc_coredump_using_sections(struct rproc *rproc);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 12/19] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Introduce function rproc_detach() to enable the remoteproc
core to release the resources associated with a remote processor
without stopping its operation.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
New for V5:
- Fixed comment about rproc_actuate() that no longer exists.
- Added call to rproc_unprepare_device() to balance rproc_prepare_device() in
  function rproc_attach().
- Removed RB from Peng and Arnaud because of the above.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  1 +
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index b150138542d4..660dcc002ff6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 /*
  * __rproc_detach(): Does the opposite of __rproc_attach()
  */
-static int __maybe_unused __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1954,6 +1954,70 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
 
+/**
+ * rproc_detach() - Detach the remote processor from the
+ * remoteproc core
+ *
+ * @rproc: the remote processor
+ *
+ * Detach a remote processor (previously attached to with rproc_attach()).
+ *
+ * In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
+ * this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
+ * without disconnecting the device.
+ *
+ * Function rproc_detach() calls __rproc_detach() in order to let a remote
+ * processor know that services provided by the application processor are
+ * no longer available.  From there it should be possible to remove the
+ * platform driver and even power cycle the application processor (if the HW
+ * supports it) without needing to switch off the remote processor.
+ */
+int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
+		ret = -EPERM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* clean up all acquired resources */
+	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
+
+	/* release HW resources if needed */
+	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+
+	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
+
+	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
+	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_detach);
+
 /**
  * rproc_get_by_phandle() - find a remote processor by phandle
  * @phandle: phandle to the rproc
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index eff55ec72e80..e1c843c19cc6 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
 
 int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc);
 void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
+int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_set_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, const char *fw_name);
 void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type);
 void rproc_coredump_using_sections(struct rproc *rproc);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Mathieu Poirier]

If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
copy of the resource table.  That way we can start from the same
resource table without having to worry about original values or what
elements the startup code has changed when re-attaching to the remote
processor.

Reported-by: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c       | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 24 +++++++-
 include/linux/remoteproc.h                 |  3 +
 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 660dcc002ff6..9a77cb6d6470 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1527,7 +1527,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 clean_up_resources:
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
 	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
 	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
 unprepare_rproc:
 	/* release HW resources if needed */
@@ -1555,6 +1557,23 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
+	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
+	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
+	 *
+	 *	DETACHED -> ATTACHED -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
+	 *
+	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in rproc_elf_load_rsc_table()
+	 * for cases where the remote processor is booted by the remoteproc
+	 * core and later detached from.
+	 */
+	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
+		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table_ptr, table_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!rproc->clean_table)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
 	 * to work with a cached table.
@@ -1566,6 +1585,40 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	/*
+	 * In order to detach() from a remote processor a clean resource table
+	 * _must_ have been allocated at boot time, either from rproc_fw_boot()
+	 * or from rproc_attach().  If one isn't present something went really
+	 * wrong and we must complain.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON(!rproc->clean_table))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Install the clean resource table where the firmware, i.e
+	 * rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(), expects it.
+	 */
+	memcpy(rproc->table_ptr, rproc->clean_table, rproc->table_sz);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the remote processors was started by the core then a cached_table
+	 * is present and we must follow the same cleanup sequence as we would
+	 * for a shutdown().  As it is in rproc_stop(), use the cached resource
+	 * table for the rest of the detach process since ->table_ptr will
+	 * become invalid as soon as carveouts are released in
+	 * rproc_resource_cleanup().
+	 *
+	 * If the remote processor was started by an external entity the
+	 * cached_table is NULL and the rest of the cleanup code in
+	 * rproc_free_vring() can deal with that.
+	 */
+	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
  * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
@@ -1947,7 +2000,10 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
 	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+	/* Free the clean resource table */
+	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
 	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
@@ -2000,6 +2056,16 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Install a clean resource table for re-attach while
+	 * rproc->table_ptr is still valid.
+	 */
+	ret = rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	/* clean up all acquired resources */
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
 
@@ -2008,10 +2074,14 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
 
+	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
+	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
 	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
 	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
 	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
+
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
 	return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
index df68d87752e4..aa09782c932d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
@@ -17,10 +17,11 @@
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt)    "%s: " fmt, __func__
 
-#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/elf.h>
 #include <linux/firmware.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
-#include <linux/elf.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 
 #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
 #include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
@@ -338,6 +339,25 @@ int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 	if (!rproc->cached_table)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	/*
+	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
+	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
+	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
+	 *
+	 *	OFFLINE -> RUNNING -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
+	 *
+	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in
+	 * rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() for cases where the remote processor is
+	 * booted by an external entity and later detached from.
+	 */
+	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
+		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table, tablesz, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!rproc->clean_table) {
+			kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		}
+	}
+
 	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
 	rproc->table_sz = tablesz;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index e1c843c19cc6..e5f52a12a650 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -514,6 +514,8 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @recovery_disabled: flag that state if recovery was disabled
  * @max_notifyid: largest allocated notify id.
  * @table_ptr: pointer to the resource table in effect
+ * @clean_table: copy of the resource table without modifications.  Used
+ *		 when a remote processor is attached or detached from the core
  * @cached_table: copy of the resource table
  * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
  * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
@@ -550,6 +552,7 @@ struct rproc {
 	bool recovery_disabled;
 	int max_notifyid;
 	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
+	struct resource_table *clean_table;
 	struct resource_table *cached_table;
 	size_t table_sz;
 	bool has_iommu;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Mathieu Poirier]

If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
copy of the resource table.  That way we can start from the same
resource table without having to worry about original values or what
elements the startup code has changed when re-attaching to the remote
processor.

Reported-by: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c       | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 24 +++++++-
 include/linux/remoteproc.h                 |  3 +
 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 660dcc002ff6..9a77cb6d6470 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1527,7 +1527,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 clean_up_resources:
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
 	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
 	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
 unprepare_rproc:
 	/* release HW resources if needed */
@@ -1555,6 +1557,23 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
+	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
+	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
+	 *
+	 *	DETACHED -> ATTACHED -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
+	 *
+	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in rproc_elf_load_rsc_table()
+	 * for cases where the remote processor is booted by the remoteproc
+	 * core and later detached from.
+	 */
+	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
+		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table_ptr, table_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!rproc->clean_table)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
 	 * to work with a cached table.
@@ -1566,6 +1585,40 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	/*
+	 * In order to detach() from a remote processor a clean resource table
+	 * _must_ have been allocated at boot time, either from rproc_fw_boot()
+	 * or from rproc_attach().  If one isn't present something went really
+	 * wrong and we must complain.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON(!rproc->clean_table))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Install the clean resource table where the firmware, i.e
+	 * rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(), expects it.
+	 */
+	memcpy(rproc->table_ptr, rproc->clean_table, rproc->table_sz);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the remote processors was started by the core then a cached_table
+	 * is present and we must follow the same cleanup sequence as we would
+	 * for a shutdown().  As it is in rproc_stop(), use the cached resource
+	 * table for the rest of the detach process since ->table_ptr will
+	 * become invalid as soon as carveouts are released in
+	 * rproc_resource_cleanup().
+	 *
+	 * If the remote processor was started by an external entity the
+	 * cached_table is NULL and the rest of the cleanup code in
+	 * rproc_free_vring() can deal with that.
+	 */
+	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
  * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
@@ -1947,7 +2000,10 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
 	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+	/* Free the clean resource table */
+	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
 	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
@@ -2000,6 +2056,16 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Install a clean resource table for re-attach while
+	 * rproc->table_ptr is still valid.
+	 */
+	ret = rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	/* clean up all acquired resources */
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
 
@@ -2008,10 +2074,14 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
 
+	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
+	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
 	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
 	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
 	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
+
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
 	return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
index df68d87752e4..aa09782c932d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
@@ -17,10 +17,11 @@
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt)    "%s: " fmt, __func__
 
-#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/elf.h>
 #include <linux/firmware.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
-#include <linux/elf.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 
 #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
 #include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
@@ -338,6 +339,25 @@ int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 	if (!rproc->cached_table)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	/*
+	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
+	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
+	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
+	 *
+	 *	OFFLINE -> RUNNING -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
+	 *
+	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in
+	 * rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() for cases where the remote processor is
+	 * booted by an external entity and later detached from.
+	 */
+	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
+		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table, tablesz, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!rproc->clean_table) {
+			kfree(rproc->cached_table);
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		}
+	}
+
 	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
 	rproc->table_sz = tablesz;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index e1c843c19cc6..e5f52a12a650 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -514,6 +514,8 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @recovery_disabled: flag that state if recovery was disabled
  * @max_notifyid: largest allocated notify id.
  * @table_ptr: pointer to the resource table in effect
+ * @clean_table: copy of the resource table without modifications.  Used
+ *		 when a remote processor is attached or detached from the core
  * @cached_table: copy of the resource table
  * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
  * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
@@ -550,6 +552,7 @@ struct rproc {
 	bool recovery_disabled;
 	int max_notifyid;
 	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
+	struct resource_table *clean_table;
 	struct resource_table *cached_table;
 	size_t table_sz;
 	bool has_iommu;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Dan Carpenter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2395 bytes --]

Hi Mathieu,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-Add-support-for-detaching-a-remote-processor/20210212-075607
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: ia64-randconfig-m031-20210209 (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2080 rproc_detach() error: double free of 'rproc->cached_table'

vim +2080 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2069  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2070  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2071  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2072  	/* release HW resources if needed */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2073  	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2074  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2075  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2076  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2077  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2078  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2079  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11 @2080  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Double free.

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2081  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2082  	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2083  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2084  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2085  out:
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2086  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2087  	return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2088  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31951 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Dan Carpenter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2441 bytes --]

Hi Mathieu,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-Add-support-for-detaching-a-remote-processor/20210212-075607
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: ia64-randconfig-m031-20210209 (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2080 rproc_detach() error: double free of 'rproc->cached_table'

vim +2080 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2069  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2070  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2071  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2072  	/* release HW resources if needed */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2073  	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2074  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2075  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2076  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2077  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2078  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2079  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11 @2080  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Double free.

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2081  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2082  	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2083  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2084  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2085  out:
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2086  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2087  	return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2088  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31951 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Dan Carpenter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2395 bytes --]

Hi Mathieu,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-Add-support-for-detaching-a-remote-processor/20210212-075607
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: ia64-randconfig-m031-20210209 (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2080 rproc_detach() error: double free of 'rproc->cached_table'

vim +2080 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2069  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2070  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2071  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2072  	/* release HW resources if needed */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2073  	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2074  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2075  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2076  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2077  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2078  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2079  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11 @2080  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Double free.

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2081  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2082  	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2083  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2084  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2085  out:
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2086  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2087  	return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2088  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31951 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Dan Carpenter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2441 bytes --]

Hi Mathieu,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-Add-support-for-detaching-a-remote-processor/20210212-075607
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: ia64-randconfig-m031-20210209 (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2080 rproc_detach() error: double free of 'rproc->cached_table'

vim +2080 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2069  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2070  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2071  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2072  	/* release HW resources if needed */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2073  	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2074  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2075  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2076  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2077  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2078  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2079  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11 @2080  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Double free.

eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2081  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2082  	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2083  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2084  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2085  out:
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2086  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2087  	return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2088  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31951 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

On 2/12/21 12:46 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
> copy of the resource table.  That way we can start from the same
> resource table without having to worry about original values or what
> elements the startup code has changed when re-attaching to the remote
> processor.
> 
> Reported-by: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c       | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 24 +++++++-
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h                 |  3 +
>  3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 660dcc002ff6..9a77cb6d6470 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1527,7 +1527,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  clean_up_resources:
>  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> +	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
>  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
>  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>  unprepare_rproc:
>  	/* release HW resources if needed */
> @@ -1555,6 +1557,23 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
> +	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
> +	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
> +	 *
> +	 *	DETACHED -> ATTACHED -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
> +	 *
> +	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in rproc_elf_load_rsc_table()
> +	 * for cases where the remote processor is booted by the remoteproc
> +	 * core and later detached from.
> +	 */
> +	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
> +		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table_ptr, table_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!rproc->clean_table)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
>  	 * to work with a cached table.
> @@ -1566,6 +1585,40 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * In order to detach() from a remote processor a clean resource table
> +	 * _must_ have been allocated at boot time, either from rproc_fw_boot()
> +	 * or from rproc_attach().  If one isn't present something went really
> +	 * wrong and we must complain.
> +	 */
> +	if (WARN_ON(!rproc->clean_table))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Install the clean resource table where the firmware, i.e
> +	 * rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(), expects it.
> +	 */
> +	memcpy(rproc->table_ptr, rproc->clean_table, rproc->table_sz);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the remote processors was started by the core then a cached_table
> +	 * is present and we must follow the same cleanup sequence as we would
> +	 * for a shutdown().  As it is in rproc_stop(), use the cached resource
> +	 * table for the rest of the detach process since ->table_ptr will
> +	 * become invalid as soon as carveouts are released in
> +	 * rproc_resource_cleanup().
> +	 *
> +	 * If the remote processor was started by an external entity the
> +	 * cached_table is NULL and the rest of the cleanup code in
> +	 * rproc_free_vring() can deal with that.
> +	 */
> +	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
>   * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> @@ -1947,7 +2000,10 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
>  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> +	/* Free the clean resource table */
> +	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
>  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
>  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> @@ -2000,6 +2056,16 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Install a clean resource table for re-attach while
> +	 * rproc->table_ptr is still valid.
> +	 */
> +	ret = rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +

Here you rewrite the initial values in the loaded resource table but then
rproc_resource_cleanup will clean up the resource table.
That can lead to an overwrite, and perhaps to unexpected memory access, as
DA and PA addresses are reinitialized.
(e.g call of rproc_vdev_release that will overwrite the resource table)

And because the vdev release is asynchronous, probably better to reinitialize
the resource table on attach or in rproc_handle_resources.

Regards,
Arnaud

>  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
>  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>  
> @@ -2008,10 +2074,14 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>  
> +	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
> +	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
>  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
>  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
>  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
>  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> +
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
>  	return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> index df68d87752e4..aa09782c932d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> @@ -17,10 +17,11 @@
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt)    "%s: " fmt, __func__
>  
> -#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/elf.h>
>  #include <linux/firmware.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> -#include <linux/elf.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>  #include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
> @@ -338,6 +339,25 @@ int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	if (!rproc->cached_table)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
> +	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
> +	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
> +	 *
> +	 *	OFFLINE -> RUNNING -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
> +	 *
> +	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in
> +	 * rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() for cases where the remote processor is
> +	 * booted by an external entity and later detached from.
> +	 */
> +	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
> +		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table, tablesz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!rproc->clean_table) {
> +			kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
>  	rproc->table_sz = tablesz;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index e1c843c19cc6..e5f52a12a650 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -514,6 +514,8 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
>   * @recovery_disabled: flag that state if recovery was disabled
>   * @max_notifyid: largest allocated notify id.
>   * @table_ptr: pointer to the resource table in effect
> + * @clean_table: copy of the resource table without modifications.  Used
> + *		 when a remote processor is attached or detached from the core
>   * @cached_table: copy of the resource table
>   * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
>   * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
> @@ -550,6 +552,7 @@ struct rproc {
>  	bool recovery_disabled;
>  	int max_notifyid;
>  	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> +	struct resource_table *clean_table;
>  	struct resource_table *cached_table;
>  	size_t table_sz;
>  	bool has_iommu;
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

On 2/12/21 12:46 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
> copy of the resource table.  That way we can start from the same
> resource table without having to worry about original values or what
> elements the startup code has changed when re-attaching to the remote
> processor.
> 
> Reported-by: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c       | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 24 +++++++-
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h                 |  3 +
>  3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 660dcc002ff6..9a77cb6d6470 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1527,7 +1527,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  clean_up_resources:
>  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> +	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
>  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
>  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>  unprepare_rproc:
>  	/* release HW resources if needed */
> @@ -1555,6 +1557,23 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
> +	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
> +	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
> +	 *
> +	 *	DETACHED -> ATTACHED -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
> +	 *
> +	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in rproc_elf_load_rsc_table()
> +	 * for cases where the remote processor is booted by the remoteproc
> +	 * core and later detached from.
> +	 */
> +	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
> +		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table_ptr, table_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!rproc->clean_table)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
>  	 * to work with a cached table.
> @@ -1566,6 +1585,40 @@ static int rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * In order to detach() from a remote processor a clean resource table
> +	 * _must_ have been allocated at boot time, either from rproc_fw_boot()
> +	 * or from rproc_attach().  If one isn't present something went really
> +	 * wrong and we must complain.
> +	 */
> +	if (WARN_ON(!rproc->clean_table))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Install the clean resource table where the firmware, i.e
> +	 * rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(), expects it.
> +	 */
> +	memcpy(rproc->table_ptr, rproc->clean_table, rproc->table_sz);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the remote processors was started by the core then a cached_table
> +	 * is present and we must follow the same cleanup sequence as we would
> +	 * for a shutdown().  As it is in rproc_stop(), use the cached resource
> +	 * table for the rest of the detach process since ->table_ptr will
> +	 * become invalid as soon as carveouts are released in
> +	 * rproc_resource_cleanup().
> +	 *
> +	 * If the remote processor was started by an external entity the
> +	 * cached_table is NULL and the rest of the cleanup code in
> +	 * rproc_free_vring() can deal with that.
> +	 */
> +	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
>   * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> @@ -1947,7 +2000,10 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
>  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> +	/* Free the clean resource table */
> +	kfree(rproc->clean_table);
>  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
>  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> @@ -2000,6 +2056,16 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Install a clean resource table for re-attach while
> +	 * rproc->table_ptr is still valid.
> +	 */
> +	ret = rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +

Here you rewrite the initial values in the loaded resource table but then
rproc_resource_cleanup will clean up the resource table.
That can lead to an overwrite, and perhaps to unexpected memory access, as
DA and PA addresses are reinitialized.
(e.g call of rproc_vdev_release that will overwrite the resource table)

And because the vdev release is asynchronous, probably better to reinitialize
the resource table on attach or in rproc_handle_resources.

Regards,
Arnaud

>  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
>  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>  
> @@ -2008,10 +2074,14 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>  
> +	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
> +	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
>  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
>  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
>  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
>  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> +
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
>  	return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> index df68d87752e4..aa09782c932d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> @@ -17,10 +17,11 @@
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt)    "%s: " fmt, __func__
>  
> -#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/elf.h>
>  #include <linux/firmware.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> -#include <linux/elf.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>  #include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
> @@ -338,6 +339,25 @@ int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	if (!rproc->cached_table)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched
> +	 * copy of the resource table.  That way we can start fresh again when
> +	 * the remote processor is re-attached, that is:
> +	 *
> +	 *	OFFLINE -> RUNNING -> DETACHED -> ATTACHED
> +	 *
> +	 * A clean copy of the table is also taken in
> +	 * rproc_set_loaded_rsc_table() for cases where the remote processor is
> +	 * booted by an external entity and later detached from.
> +	 */
> +	if (rproc->ops->detach) {
> +		rproc->clean_table = kmemdup(table, tablesz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!rproc->clean_table) {
> +			kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
>  	rproc->table_sz = tablesz;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index e1c843c19cc6..e5f52a12a650 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -514,6 +514,8 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
>   * @recovery_disabled: flag that state if recovery was disabled
>   * @max_notifyid: largest allocated notify id.
>   * @table_ptr: pointer to the resource table in effect
> + * @clean_table: copy of the resource table without modifications.  Used
> + *		 when a remote processor is attached or detached from the core
>   * @cached_table: copy of the resource table
>   * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
>   * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
> @@ -550,6 +552,7 @@ struct rproc {
>  	bool recovery_disabled;
>  	int max_notifyid;
>  	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> +	struct resource_table *clean_table;
>  	struct resource_table *cached_table;
>  	size_t table_sz;
>  	bool has_iommu;
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 14/19] remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add a return value to function rproc_shutdown() in order to
properly deal with error conditions that may occur.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 9a77cb6d6470..62f708662052 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot);
  *   returns, and users can still use it with a subsequent rproc_boot(), if
  *   needed.
  */
-void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
+int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1974,15 +1974,19 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
-		return;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING) {
+		ret = -EPERM;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
-	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power))
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, false);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -1994,7 +1998,11 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
 
 	/* release HW resources if needed */
-	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+	ret = rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
 
@@ -2007,6 +2015,7 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index e5f52a12a650..5b49c4018e90 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
 			     u32 da, const char *name, ...);
 
 int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc);
-void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
+int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_set_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, const char *fw_name);
 void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 14/19] remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Add a return value to function rproc_shutdown() in order to
properly deal with error conditions that may occur.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 9a77cb6d6470..62f708662052 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot);
  *   returns, and users can still use it with a subsequent rproc_boot(), if
  *   needed.
  */
-void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
+int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -1974,15 +1974,19 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
-		return;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING) {
+		ret = -EPERM;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
-	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power))
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, false);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -1994,7 +1998,11 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
 
 	/* release HW resources if needed */
-	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+	ret = rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
 
@@ -2007,6 +2015,7 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index e5f52a12a650..5b49c4018e90 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
 			     u32 da, const char *name, ...);
 
 int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc);
-void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
+int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_set_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, const char *fw_name);
 void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 15/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached

[Mathieu Poirier]

The panic handler operation of registered remote processors
should also be called when remote processors have been
attached to.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 62f708662052..0dd9f02f52b6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2693,7 +2693,11 @@ static int rproc_panic_handler(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(rproc, &rproc_list, node) {
-		if (!rproc->ops->panic || rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (!rproc->ops->panic)
+			continue;
+
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			continue;
 
 		d = rproc->ops->panic(rproc);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 15/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached

[Mathieu Poirier]

The panic handler operation of registered remote processors
should also be called when remote processors have been
attached to.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 62f708662052..0dd9f02f52b6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2693,7 +2693,11 @@ static int rproc_panic_handler(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(rproc, &rproc_list, node) {
-		if (!rproc->ops->panic || rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (!rproc->ops->panic)
+			continue;
+
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			continue;
 
 		d = rproc->ops->panic(rproc);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 16/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch introduces the capability to stop a remote processor
that has been attached to by the remoteproc core.  For that to
happen a rproc::ops::stop() operation need to be available.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c  | 5 +++--
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c  | 6 +++++-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 5 +++--
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index b19ea3057bde..d06f8d4919c7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
 
 		ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
 	} else if (!strncmp(cmd, "stop", len)) {
-		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognized option\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 0dd9f02f52b6..12bd177aa8cd 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1740,6 +1740,10 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
 
+	/* No need to continue if a stop() operation has not been provided */
+	if (!rproc->ops->stop)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/* Stop any subdevices for the remote processor */
 	rproc_stop_subdevices(rproc, crashed);
 
@@ -1977,7 +1981,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING) {
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
 		ret = -EPERM;
 		goto out;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index f9694def9b54..3696f2ccc785 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -201,10 +201,11 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
 		if (ret)
 			dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
 	} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "stop")) {
-		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 16/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch introduces the capability to stop a remote processor
that has been attached to by the remoteproc core.  For that to
happen a rproc::ops::stop() operation need to be available.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c  | 5 +++--
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c  | 6 +++++-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 5 +++--
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index b19ea3057bde..d06f8d4919c7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
 
 		ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
 	} else if (!strncmp(cmd, "stop", len)) {
-		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognized option\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 0dd9f02f52b6..12bd177aa8cd 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1740,6 +1740,10 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
 
+	/* No need to continue if a stop() operation has not been provided */
+	if (!rproc->ops->stop)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/* Stop any subdevices for the remote processor */
 	rproc_stop_subdevices(rproc, crashed);
 
@@ -1977,7 +1981,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING) {
+	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
 		ret = -EPERM;
 		goto out;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index f9694def9b54..3696f2ccc785 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -201,10 +201,11 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
 		if (ret)
 			dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
 	} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "stop")) {
-		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 17/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request when attached

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch takes into account scenarios where a remote processor
has been attached to when receiving a "start" command from sysfs.

As with the "running" case, the command can't be carried out if the
remote processor is already in operation.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c  | 3 ++-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index d06f8d4919c7..61541bc7d26c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	if (!strncmp(cmd, "start", len)) {
-		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING ||
+		    rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EBUSY;
 
 		ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 3696f2ccc785..7d281cfe3e03 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (sysfs_streq(buf, "start")) {
-		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING ||
+		    rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EBUSY;
 
 		ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 17/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request when attached

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch takes into account scenarios where a remote processor
has been attached to when receiving a "start" command from sysfs.

As with the "running" case, the command can't be carried out if the
remote processor is already in operation.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c  | 3 ++-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index d06f8d4919c7..61541bc7d26c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	if (!strncmp(cmd, "start", len)) {
-		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING ||
+		    rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EBUSY;
 
 		ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 3696f2ccc785..7d281cfe3e03 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (sysfs_streq(buf, "start")) {
-		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
+		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING ||
+		    rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
 			return -EBUSY;
 
 		ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 18/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with detach request

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch introduces the capability to detach a remote processor
that has been attached to or booted by the remoteproc core.  For
that to happen a rproc::ops::detach() operation need to be
available.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c  | 6 ++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index 61541bc7d26c..f7645f289563 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	} else if (!strncmp(cmd, "detach", len)) {
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognized option\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 7d281cfe3e03..5a239df5877e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "detach")) {
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 18/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with detach request

[Mathieu Poirier]

This patch introduces the capability to detach a remote processor
that has been attached to or booted by the remoteproc core.  For
that to happen a rproc::ops::detach() operation need to be
available.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c  | 6 ++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index 61541bc7d26c..f7645f289563 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	} else if (!strncmp(cmd, "detach", len)) {
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognized option\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 7d281cfe3e03..5a239df5877e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "detach")) {
+		if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
+		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
 	} else {
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v5 19/19] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path

[Mathieu Poirier]

Refactor function rproc_del() and rproc_cdev_release() to take
into account the policy specified in the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c | 18 +++++++++++---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index f7645f289563..9b2fb6fbf8e7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -87,11 +87,23 @@ static long rproc_device_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned l
 static int rproc_cdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	struct rproc *rproc = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct rproc, cdev);
+	int ret;
 
-	if (rproc->cdev_put_on_release && rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	if (!rproc->cdev_put_on_release)
+		return 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	/*
+	 * The application has crashed or is releasing its file handle.  Detach
+	 * or shutdown the remote processor based on the policy specified in the
+	 * DT.  No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done
+	 * in either rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().
+	 */
+	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
+	else
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations rproc_fops = {
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 12bd177aa8cd..36b3592caf34 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2413,6 +2413,22 @@ static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct rproc_ops *ops)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void rproc_set_automation_flags(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	bool core_shutdown;
+
+	/*
+	 * When function rproc_cdev_release() or rproc_del() are called and
+	 * the remote processor has been attached to, it will be detached from
+	 * (rather than turned off) if "autonomous-on-core-shutdown is specified
+	 * in the DT.
+	 */
+	core_shutdown = of_property_read_bool(np, "autonomous-on-core-shutdown");
+	rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown = core_shutdown;
+}
+
 /**
  * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
  * @dev: the underlying device
@@ -2471,6 +2487,8 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 	if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops))
 		goto put_device;
 
+	rproc_set_automation_flags(rproc);
+
 	/* Assign a unique device index and name */
 	rproc->index = ida_simple_get(&rproc_dev_index, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (rproc->index < 0) {
@@ -2547,15 +2565,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_put);
  * of the outstanding reference created by rproc_alloc. To decrement that
  * one last refcount, one still needs to call rproc_free().
  *
- * Returns 0 on success and -EINVAL if @rproc isn't valid.
+ * Returns 0 on success and a negative error code on failure.
  */
 int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
+	int ret;
+
 	if (!rproc)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */
-	rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	/*
+	 * TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1
+	 *
+	 * No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done in either
+	 * rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().
+	 */
+	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
+	else
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 
 	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
 	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;
@@ -2574,7 +2602,7 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	device_del(&rproc->dev);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_del);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 5b49c4018e90..bd3ac6a47e47 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -524,6 +524,9 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
  * @char_dev: character device of the rproc
  * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release
+ * @autonomous_on_core_shutdown: true if the remote processor should be detached
+ *				 from (rather than turned off) when the remoteproc
+ *				 core goes away.
  */
 struct rproc {
 	struct list_head node;
@@ -563,6 +566,7 @@ struct rproc {
 	u16 elf_machine;
 	struct cdev cdev;
 	bool cdev_put_on_release;
+	bool autonomous_on_core_shutdown;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 19/19] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path

[Mathieu Poirier]

Refactor function rproc_del() and rproc_cdev_release() to take
into account the policy specified in the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c | 18 +++++++++++---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index f7645f289563..9b2fb6fbf8e7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -87,11 +87,23 @@ static long rproc_device_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned l
 static int rproc_cdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	struct rproc *rproc = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct rproc, cdev);
+	int ret;
 
-	if (rproc->cdev_put_on_release && rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
-		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	if (!rproc->cdev_put_on_release)
+		return 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	/*
+	 * The application has crashed or is releasing its file handle.  Detach
+	 * or shutdown the remote processor based on the policy specified in the
+	 * DT.  No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done
+	 * in either rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().
+	 */
+	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
+	else
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations rproc_fops = {
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 12bd177aa8cd..36b3592caf34 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2413,6 +2413,22 @@ static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct rproc_ops *ops)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void rproc_set_automation_flags(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	bool core_shutdown;
+
+	/*
+	 * When function rproc_cdev_release() or rproc_del() are called and
+	 * the remote processor has been attached to, it will be detached from
+	 * (rather than turned off) if "autonomous-on-core-shutdown is specified
+	 * in the DT.
+	 */
+	core_shutdown = of_property_read_bool(np, "autonomous-on-core-shutdown");
+	rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown = core_shutdown;
+}
+
 /**
  * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
  * @dev: the underlying device
@@ -2471,6 +2487,8 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 	if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops))
 		goto put_device;
 
+	rproc_set_automation_flags(rproc);
+
 	/* Assign a unique device index and name */
 	rproc->index = ida_simple_get(&rproc_dev_index, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (rproc->index < 0) {
@@ -2547,15 +2565,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_put);
  * of the outstanding reference created by rproc_alloc. To decrement that
  * one last refcount, one still needs to call rproc_free().
  *
- * Returns 0 on success and -EINVAL if @rproc isn't valid.
+ * Returns 0 on success and a negative error code on failure.
  */
 int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
+	int ret;
+
 	if (!rproc)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */
-	rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	/*
+	 * TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1
+	 *
+	 * No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done in either
+	 * rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().
+	 */
+	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)
+		ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
+	else
+		ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 
 	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
 	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;
@@ -2574,7 +2602,7 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	device_del(&rproc->dev);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_del);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 5b49c4018e90..bd3ac6a47e47 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -524,6 +524,9 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
  * @char_dev: character device of the rproc
  * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release
+ * @autonomous_on_core_shutdown: true if the remote processor should be detached
+ *				 from (rather than turned off) when the remoteproc
+ *				 core goes away.
  */
 struct rproc {
 	struct list_head node;
@@ -563,6 +566,7 @@ struct rproc {
 	u16 elf_machine;
 	struct cdev cdev;
 	bool cdev_put_on_release;
+	bool autonomous_on_core_shutdown;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7782 bytes --]

CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
In-Reply-To: <20210211234627.2669674-14-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
References: <20210211234627.2669674-14-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
TO: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
TO: ohad(a)wizery.com
TO: bjorn.andersson(a)linaro.org
TO: arnaud.pouliquen(a)st.com
CC: robh+dt(a)kernel.org
CC: mcoquelin.stm32(a)gmail.com
CC: alexandre.torgue(a)st.com
CC: linux-remoteproc(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: devicetree(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org

Hi Mathieu,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.11-rc7 next-20210211]
[cannot apply to remoteproc/for-next rpmsg/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-Add-support-for-detaching-a-remote-processor/20210212-075607
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
:::::: branch date: 3 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 3 hours ago
config: openrisc-randconfig-c003-20210209 (attached as .config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>


"coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)"
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2080:7-26: ERROR: reference preceded by free on line 2078

vim +2080 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

400e64df6b237e Ohad Ben-Cohen  2011-10-20  2012  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2013  /**
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2014   * rproc_detach() - Detach the remote processor from the
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2015   * remoteproc core
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2016   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2017   * @rproc: the remote processor
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2018   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2019   * Detach a remote processor (previously attached to with rproc_attach()).
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2020   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2021   * In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2022   * this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2023   * without disconnecting the device.
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2024   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2025   * Function rproc_detach() calls __rproc_detach() in order to let a remote
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2026   * processor know that services provided by the application processor are
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2027   * no longer available.  From there it should be possible to remove the
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2028   * platform driver and even power cycle the application processor (if the HW
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2029   * supports it) without needing to switch off the remote processor.
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2030   */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2031  int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2032  {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2033  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2034  	int ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2035  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2036  	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2037  	if (ret) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2038  		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2039  		return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2040  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2041  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2042  	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2043  		ret = -EPERM;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2044  		goto out;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2045  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2046  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2047  	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2048  	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2049  		ret = -EBUSY;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2050  		goto out;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2051  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2052  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2053  	ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2054  	if (ret) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2055  		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2056  		goto out;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2057  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2058  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2059  	/*
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2060  	 * Install a clean resource table for re-attach while
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2061  	 * rproc->table_ptr is still valid.
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2062  	 */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2063  	ret = rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2064  	if (ret) {
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2065  		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2066  		goto out;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2067  	}
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2068  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2069  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2070  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2071  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2072  	/* release HW resources if needed */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2073  	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2074  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2075  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2076  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2077  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11 @2078  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2079  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11 @2080  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2081  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2082  	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2083  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2084  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2085  out:
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2086  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2087  	return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2088  }
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2089  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_detach);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2090  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 24584 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7752 bytes --]

CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
In-Reply-To: <20210211234627.2669674-14-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
References: <20210211234627.2669674-14-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
TO: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
TO: ohad(a)wizery.com
TO: bjorn.andersson(a)linaro.org
TO: arnaud.pouliquen(a)st.com
CC: robh+dt(a)kernel.org
CC: mcoquelin.stm32(a)gmail.com
CC: alexandre.torgue(a)st.com
CC: linux-remoteproc(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: devicetree(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org

Hi Mathieu,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.11-rc7 next-20210211]
[cannot apply to remoteproc/for-next rpmsg/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-Add-support-for-detaching-a-remote-processor/20210212-075607
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
:::::: branch date: 6 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 6 hours ago
config: ia64-randconfig-m031-20210209 (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:2080 rproc_detach() error: double free of 'rproc->cached_table'

vim +2080 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

400e64df6b237e Ohad Ben-Cohen  2011-10-20  2012  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2013  /**
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2014   * rproc_detach() - Detach the remote processor from the
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2015   * remoteproc core
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2016   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2017   * @rproc: the remote processor
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2018   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2019   * Detach a remote processor (previously attached to with rproc_attach()).
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2020   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2021   * In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2022   * this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2023   * without disconnecting the device.
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2024   *
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2025   * Function rproc_detach() calls __rproc_detach() in order to let a remote
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2026   * processor know that services provided by the application processor are
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2027   * no longer available.  From there it should be possible to remove the
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2028   * platform driver and even power cycle the application processor (if the HW
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2029   * supports it) without needing to switch off the remote processor.
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2030   */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2031  int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2032  {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2033  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2034  	int ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2035  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2036  	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2037  	if (ret) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2038  		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2039  		return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2040  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2041  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2042  	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2043  		ret = -EPERM;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2044  		goto out;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2045  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2046  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2047  	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2048  	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2049  		ret = -EBUSY;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2050  		goto out;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2051  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2052  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2053  	ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2054  	if (ret) {
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2055  		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2056  		goto out;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2057  	}
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2058  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2059  	/*
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2060  	 * Install a clean resource table for re-attach while
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2061  	 * rproc->table_ptr is still valid.
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2062  	 */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2063  	ret = rproc_reset_loaded_rsc_table(rproc);
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2064  	if (ret) {
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2065  		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2066  		goto out;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2067  	}
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2068  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2069  	/* clean up all acquired resources */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2070  	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2071  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2072  	/* release HW resources if needed */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2073  	rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2074  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2075  	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2076  
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2077  	/* Free the copy of the resource table */
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2078  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2079  	/* Follow the same sequence as in rproc_shutdown() */
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11 @2080  	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2081  	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2082  	rproc->clean_table = NULL;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2083  	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
66e2fed7a4bb20 Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2084  
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2085  out:
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2086  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2087  	return ret;
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2088  }
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2089  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_detach);
eab58da78fe46f Mathieu Poirier 2021-02-11  2090  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31951 bytes --]