From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: mte: Enable TCO in functions that can read beyond buffer limits
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:14:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210223131435.GB20769@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210223124951.GA10563@willie-the-truck>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:49:52PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:05:32PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:56:46AM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> > > On 2/22/21 5:58 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > We'll still have an issue with dynamically switching the async/sync mode
> > > > at run-time. Luckily kasan doesn't do this now. The problem is that
> > > > until the last CPU have been switched from async to sync, we can't
> > > > toggle the static label. When switching from sync to async, we need
> > > > to do it on the first CPU being switched.
> > >
> > > I totally agree on this point. In the case of runtime switching we might need
> > > the rethink completely the strategy and depends a lot on what we want to allow
> > > and what not. For the kernel I imagine we will need to expose something in sysfs
> > > that affects all the cores and then maybe stop_machine() to propagate it to all
> > > the cores. Do you think having some of the cores running in sync mode and some
> > > in async is a viable solution?
> >
> > stop_machine() is an option indeed. I think it's still possible to run
> > some cores in async while others in sync but the static key here would
> > only be toggled when no async CPUs are left.
>
> Just as a general point, but if we expose stop_machine() via sysfs we
> probably want to limit that to privileged users so you can't DoS the system
> by spamming into the file.
Definitely. Anyway, that's a later kasan feature if they'd find it
useful. Currently the mode is set at boot from cmdline.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: mte: Enable TCO in functions that can read beyond buffer limits
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:14:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210223131435.GB20769@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210223124951.GA10563@willie-the-truck>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:49:52PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:05:32PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:56:46AM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> > > On 2/22/21 5:58 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > We'll still have an issue with dynamically switching the async/sync mode
> > > > at run-time. Luckily kasan doesn't do this now. The problem is that
> > > > until the last CPU have been switched from async to sync, we can't
> > > > toggle the static label. When switching from sync to async, we need
> > > > to do it on the first CPU being switched.
> > >
> > > I totally agree on this point. In the case of runtime switching we might need
> > > the rethink completely the strategy and depends a lot on what we want to allow
> > > and what not. For the kernel I imagine we will need to expose something in sysfs
> > > that affects all the cores and then maybe stop_machine() to propagate it to all
> > > the cores. Do you think having some of the cores running in sync mode and some
> > > in async is a viable solution?
> >
> > stop_machine() is an option indeed. I think it's still possible to run
> > some cores in async while others in sync but the static key here would
> > only be toggled when no async CPUs are left.
>
> Just as a general point, but if we expose stop_machine() via sysfs we
> probably want to limit that to privileged users so you can't DoS the system
> by spamming into the file.
Definitely. Anyway, that's a later kasan feature if they'd find it
useful. Currently the mode is set at boot from cmdline.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-11 15:33 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: MTE: Add async mode support Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] arm64: mte: Add asynchronous " Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 21:21 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-12 21:21 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-22 11:14 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-22 11:14 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] kasan: Add KASAN mode kernel parameter Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 17:50 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-11 17:50 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-12 11:26 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 11:26 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] kasan: Add report for async mode Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 20:03 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-11 20:03 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-11 20:03 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-11 20:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-11 20:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-11 20:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-12 11:25 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 11:25 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 11:25 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 14:47 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-12 14:47 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-12 14:47 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-11 23:03 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-11 23:03 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: mte: Enable TCO in functions that can read beyond buffer limits Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 17:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-12 17:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-22 12:08 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-22 12:08 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-22 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-22 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-23 10:56 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-23 10:56 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-23 12:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-23 12:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-23 12:22 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-23 12:22 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-23 12:49 ` Will Deacon
2021-02-23 12:49 ` Will Deacon
2021-02-23 13:14 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-02-23 13:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-23 14:25 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-23 14:25 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] arm64: mte: Enable async tag check fault Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] arm64: mte: Report async tag faults before suspend Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 12:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-02-12 12:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-02-12 12:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-02-12 12:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-02-12 13:05 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 13:05 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 13:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-12 13:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-12 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-12 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] kasan: don't run tests in async mode Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:33 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-12 0:49 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-12 0:49 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-12 17:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-12 17:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-12 21:44 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-12 21:44 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-22 11:17 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-22 11:17 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-22 13:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-22 13:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-11 15:45 ` [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: MTE: Add async mode support Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-11 15:45 ` Vincenzo Frascino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210223131435.GB20769@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Branislav.Rankov@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.