[android-common:android12-5.10 1/1] kernel/sched/rt.c:1385:33: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named 'next'

[android-common:android12-5.10 1/1] kernel/sched/rt.c:1385:33: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named 'next'

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2509 bytes --]

tree:   https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common android12-5.10
head:   da5f3cd37802e4d68861422ba4503a4e2d58aa23
commit: da5f3cd37802e4d68861422ba4503a4e2d58aa23 [1/1] ANDROID: sched/rt: Add support for rt sync wakeups
config: x86_64-randconfig-s021-20210225 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.3-229-g60c1f270-dirty
        git remote add android-common https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common
        git fetch --no-tags android-common android12-5.10
        git checkout da5f3cd37802e4d68861422ba4503a4e2d58aa23
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/sched/rt.c:670:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_rt_bandwidth_account' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     670 | bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/sched/rt.c: In function 'should_honor_rt_sync':
>> kernel/sched/rt.c:1385:33: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named 'next'
    1385 |   p->prio <= rq->rt.highest_prio.next &&
         |                                 ^
   kernel/sched/rt.c:1387:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
    1387 | }
         | ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +1385 kernel/sched/rt.c

  1374	
  1375	#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
  1376	static inline bool should_honor_rt_sync(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
  1377						bool sync)
  1378	{
  1379		/*
  1380		 * If the waker is CFS, then an RT sync wakeup would preempt the waker
  1381		 * and force it to run for a likely small time after the RT wakee is
  1382		 * done. So, only honor RT sync wakeups from RT wakers.
  1383		 */
  1384		return sync && task_has_rt_policy(rq->curr) &&
> 1385			p->prio <= rq->rt.highest_prio.next &&
  1386			rq->rt.rt_nr_running <= 2;
  1387	}
  1388	#else
  1389	static inline bool should_honor_rt_sync(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
  1390						bool sync)
  1391	{
  1392		return 0;
  1393	}
  1394	#endif
  1395	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31653 bytes --]