* [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings
2020-05-21 16:09 [PATCH 06/12] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive_governor kbuild test robot
@ 2020-05-21 16:09 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-05-21 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2349 bytes --]
CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
In-Reply-To: <20200520034307.20435-7-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com>
References: <20200520034307.20435-7-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com>
TO: "Andrew-sh.Cheng" <andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com>
TO: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
TO: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
TO: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
TO: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
TO: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
TO: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
TO: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
TO: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
TO: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
TO: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
TO: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
TO: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: devicetree(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: "Andrew-sh . Cheng" <andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com>
CC: srv_heupstream(a)mediatek.com
CC: linux-pm(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
CC: linux-mediatek(a)lists.infradead.org
CC: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
CC: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:336:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 337.
PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
Semantic patch information:
There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call to
IS_ERR that is wrong.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
CC: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrew-sh-Cheng/Add-cpufreq-and-cci-devfreq-for-mt8183-and-SVS-support/20200520-222709
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
:::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 26 hours ago
Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
governor_passive.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_register(stru
opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(cpu_dev);
if (IS_ERR(devfreq->opp_table)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(devfreq->opp_table);
goto out;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings
2020-05-21 16:09 ` [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
(?)
@ 2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2020-05-22 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all, Andrew-sh.Cheng, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park,
Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Matthias Brugger,
Rafael J . Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd,
Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, devicetree, Andrew-sh . Cheng,
srv_heupstream, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Saravana Kannan,
linux-mediatek, Sibi Sankar, linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
This provides a patch, but it doesn't look like the right one. It looks
like the if test should be testing opp_table,
julia
On Fri, 22 May 2020, kbuild test robot wrote:
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:336:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 337.
>
> PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
>
> Semantic patch information:
> There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call to
> IS_ERR that is wrong.
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
>
> CC: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrew-sh-Cheng/Add-cpufreq-and-cci-devfreq-for-mt8183-and-SVS-support/20200520-222709
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> :::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
> :::::: commit date: 26 hours ago
>
> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>
> governor_passive.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_register(stru
>
> opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> if (IS_ERR(devfreq->opp_table)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(devfreq->opp_table);
> goto out;
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings
@ 2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2020-05-22 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all, Andrew-sh.Cheng, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park,
Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Matthias Brugger,
Rafael J . Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd,
Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, devicetree, Andrew-sh . Cheng,
srv_heupstream, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Saravana Kannan,
linux-mediatek, Sibi Sankar, linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
This provides a patch, but it doesn't look like the right one. It looks
like the if test should be testing opp_table,
julia
On Fri, 22 May 2020, kbuild test robot wrote:
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:336:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 337.
>
> PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
>
> Semantic patch information:
> There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call to
> IS_ERR that is wrong.
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
>
> CC: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrew-sh-Cheng/Add-cpufreq-and-cci-devfreq-for-mt8183-and-SVS-support/20200520-222709
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> :::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
> :::::: commit date: 26 hours ago
>
> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>
> governor_passive.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_register(stru
>
> opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> if (IS_ERR(devfreq->opp_table)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(devfreq->opp_table);
> goto out;
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings
@ 2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2020-05-22 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all, Andrew-sh.Cheng, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park,
Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Matthias Brugger,
Rafael J . Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd,
Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, devicetree, Andrew-sh . Cheng,
srv_heupstream, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Saravana Kannan,
linux-mediatek, Sibi Sankar, linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
This provides a patch, but it doesn't look like the right one. It looks
like the if test should be testing opp_table,
julia
On Fri, 22 May 2020, kbuild test robot wrote:
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:336:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 337.
>
> PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
>
> Semantic patch information:
> There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call to
> IS_ERR that is wrong.
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
>
> CC: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrew-sh-Cheng/Add-cpufreq-and-cci-devfreq-for-mt8183-and-SVS-support/20200520-222709
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> :::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
> :::::: commit date: 26 hours ago
>
> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>
> governor_passive.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_register(stru
>
> opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> if (IS_ERR(devfreq->opp_table)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(devfreq->opp_table);
> goto out;
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings
@ 2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2020-05-22 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1520 bytes --]
Hello,
This provides a patch, but it doesn't look like the right one. It looks
like the if test should be testing opp_table,
julia
On Fri, 22 May 2020, kbuild test robot wrote:
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:336:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 337.
>
> PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
>
> Semantic patch information:
> There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call to
> IS_ERR that is wrong.
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
>
> CC: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrew-sh-Cheng/Add-cpufreq-and-cci-devfreq-for-mt8183-and-SVS-support/20200520-222709
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> :::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
> :::::: commit date: 26 hours ago
>
> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>
> governor_passive.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_register(stru
>
> opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> if (IS_ERR(devfreq->opp_table)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(devfreq->opp_table);
> goto out;
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [chanwoo:devfreq-testing-passive-gov 3/3] drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:318:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 319.
@ 2021-03-01 8:35 kernel test robot
2021-03-01 8:35 ` [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings kernel test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-03-01 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]
CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
TO: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
CC: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
CC: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git devfreq-testing-passive-gov
head: 82d4ff586ae2fb6d89cad871949004bed3438ccb
commit: 82d4ff586ae2fb6d89cad871949004bed3438ccb [3/3] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor
:::::: branch date: 3 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 3 hours ago
config: arm64-randconfig-c003-20210301 (attached as .config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
"coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)"
>> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:318:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 319.
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30358 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings
2021-03-01 8:35 [chanwoo:devfreq-testing-passive-gov 3/3] drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:318:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 319 kernel test robot
@ 2021-03-01 8:35 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-03-01 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1769 bytes --]
CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
TO: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
CC: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
CC: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
CC: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
CC: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
CC: linux-pm(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:318:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 319.
PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
Semantic patch information:
There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call to
IS_ERR that is wrong.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
Fixes: 82d4ff586ae2 ("PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor")
CC: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git devfreq-testing-passive-gov
head: 82d4ff586ae2fb6d89cad871949004bed3438ccb
commit: 82d4ff586ae2fb6d89cad871949004bed3438ccb [3/3] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor
:::::: branch date: 3 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 3 hours ago
Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
governor_passive.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_register(stru
opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(cpu_dev);
if (IS_ERR(devfreq->opp_table)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(devfreq->opp_table);
goto out;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-01 8:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-01 8:35 [chanwoo:devfreq-testing-passive-gov 3/3] drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:318:7-13: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 319 kernel test robot
2021-03-01 8:35 ` [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings kernel test robot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-21 16:09 [PATCH 06/12] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive_governor kbuild test robot
2020-05-21 16:09 ` [PATCH] PM / devfreq: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
2020-05-22 12:59 ` Julia Lawall
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.