All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: guillaume.tucker@collabora.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/tegra-smmu: Fix mc errors on tegra124-nyan
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:08:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302230856.GA22992@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee0f40f4-dffe-2987-5d4b-c5896f27ec24@gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 12:59:17PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 25.02.2021 09:27, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> ...
> >> The partially revert should be okay, but it's not clear to me what makes
> >> difference for T124 since I don't see that problem on T30, which also
> >> has active display at a boot time.
> > 
> > Hmm..do you see ->attach_dev() is called from host1x_client_iommu_attach
> > or from of_dma_configure_id/arch_setup_dma_ops?
> > 
> 
> I applied yours debug-patch, please see dmesg.txt attached to the email.
> Seems probe-defer of the tegra-dc driver prevents the implicit
> tegra_smmu_attach_dev, so it happens to work by accident.

> [    0.327826] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: -------tegra_smmu_of_xlate: id 1
> [    0.328641] [<c052ec75>] (tegra_smmu_of_xlate) from [<c052e591>] (of_iommu_xlate+0x51/0x70)
> [    0.328740] [<c052e591>] (of_iommu_xlate) from [<c052e6d7>] (of_iommu_configure+0x127/0x150)
> [    0.328896] [<c052e6d7>] (of_iommu_configure) from [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id+0x1fb/0x2ec)
> [    0.329060] [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id) from [<c059743f>] (really_probe+0x7b/0x2a0)
> [    0.331438] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: --------tegra_smmu_probe_device, 822
> [    0.332234] [<c052ebed>] (tegra_smmu_probe_device) from [<c052bd6d>] (__iommu_probe_device+0x35/0x1c4)
> [    0.332391] [<c052bd6d>] (__iommu_probe_device) from [<c052c3cd>] (iommu_probe_device+0x19/0xec)
> [    0.332545] [<c052c3cd>] (iommu_probe_device) from [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure+0xfb/0x150)
> [    0.332701] [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure) from [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id+0x1fb/0x2ec)
> [    0.332804] [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id) from [<c059743f>] (really_probe+0x7b/0x2a0)
> [    0.335202] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_group_get_for_dev, 1572
> [    0.335292] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------tegra_smmu_device_group, 862
> [    0.335474] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------tegra_smmu_device_group, 909: 1: drm
> [    0.335566] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_group_get_for_dev, 1574
> [    0.335718] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_group_add_device, 858
> [    0.335862] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: Adding to iommu group 1
> [    0.335955] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_alloc_default_domain, 1543: type 3
> [    0.336101] iommu: ------iommu_group_alloc_default_domain: platform, (null), drm
> [    0.336187] ---------tegra_smmu_domain_alloc, 284: type 3
 [    0.336968] [<c0a0ff45>] (tegra_smmu_domain_alloc) from [<c0a0f87b>] (iommu_group_alloc_default_domain+0x4b/0xfa)
> [    0.337127] [<c0a0f87b>] (iommu_group_alloc_default_domain) from [<c052c41d>] (iommu_probe_device+0x69/0xec)
> [    0.337285] [<c052c41d>] (iommu_probe_device) from [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure+0xfb/0x150)
> [    0.337441] [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure) from [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id+0x1fb/0x2ec)
> [    0.337599] [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id) from [<c059743f>] (really_probe+0x7b/0x2a0)
> [    0.339913] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_probe_device, 272
> [    0.348144] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: failed to probe RGB output: -517

Hmm..not sure where this EPROBE_DEFER comes from. But you are right,
as of_dma_configure_id() returns because of that so it didn't run to
arch_setup_dma_ops() call, which allocates an UNMANAGED iommu domain
and attaches DC to it on Tegra124.

By the way, anyone can accept this change? It doesn't feel right to
leave a regression in the newer release...
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, will@kernel.org,
	guillaume.tucker@collabora.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/tegra-smmu: Fix mc errors on tegra124-nyan
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:08:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302230856.GA22992@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee0f40f4-dffe-2987-5d4b-c5896f27ec24@gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 12:59:17PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 25.02.2021 09:27, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> ...
> >> The partially revert should be okay, but it's not clear to me what makes
> >> difference for T124 since I don't see that problem on T30, which also
> >> has active display at a boot time.
> > 
> > Hmm..do you see ->attach_dev() is called from host1x_client_iommu_attach
> > or from of_dma_configure_id/arch_setup_dma_ops?
> > 
> 
> I applied yours debug-patch, please see dmesg.txt attached to the email.
> Seems probe-defer of the tegra-dc driver prevents the implicit
> tegra_smmu_attach_dev, so it happens to work by accident.

> [    0.327826] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: -------tegra_smmu_of_xlate: id 1
> [    0.328641] [<c052ec75>] (tegra_smmu_of_xlate) from [<c052e591>] (of_iommu_xlate+0x51/0x70)
> [    0.328740] [<c052e591>] (of_iommu_xlate) from [<c052e6d7>] (of_iommu_configure+0x127/0x150)
> [    0.328896] [<c052e6d7>] (of_iommu_configure) from [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id+0x1fb/0x2ec)
> [    0.329060] [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id) from [<c059743f>] (really_probe+0x7b/0x2a0)
> [    0.331438] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: --------tegra_smmu_probe_device, 822
> [    0.332234] [<c052ebed>] (tegra_smmu_probe_device) from [<c052bd6d>] (__iommu_probe_device+0x35/0x1c4)
> [    0.332391] [<c052bd6d>] (__iommu_probe_device) from [<c052c3cd>] (iommu_probe_device+0x19/0xec)
> [    0.332545] [<c052c3cd>] (iommu_probe_device) from [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure+0xfb/0x150)
> [    0.332701] [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure) from [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id+0x1fb/0x2ec)
> [    0.332804] [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id) from [<c059743f>] (really_probe+0x7b/0x2a0)
> [    0.335202] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_group_get_for_dev, 1572
> [    0.335292] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------tegra_smmu_device_group, 862
> [    0.335474] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------tegra_smmu_device_group, 909: 1: drm
> [    0.335566] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_group_get_for_dev, 1574
> [    0.335718] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_group_add_device, 858
> [    0.335862] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: Adding to iommu group 1
> [    0.335955] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_alloc_default_domain, 1543: type 3
> [    0.336101] iommu: ------iommu_group_alloc_default_domain: platform, (null), drm
> [    0.336187] ---------tegra_smmu_domain_alloc, 284: type 3
 [    0.336968] [<c0a0ff45>] (tegra_smmu_domain_alloc) from [<c0a0f87b>] (iommu_group_alloc_default_domain+0x4b/0xfa)
> [    0.337127] [<c0a0f87b>] (iommu_group_alloc_default_domain) from [<c052c41d>] (iommu_probe_device+0x69/0xec)
> [    0.337285] [<c052c41d>] (iommu_probe_device) from [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure+0xfb/0x150)
> [    0.337441] [<c052e6ab>] (of_iommu_configure) from [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id+0x1fb/0x2ec)
> [    0.337599] [<c073f697>] (of_dma_configure_id) from [<c059743f>] (really_probe+0x7b/0x2a0)
> [    0.339913] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: ---------iommu_probe_device, 272
> [    0.348144] tegra-dc 54200000.dc: failed to probe RGB output: -517

Hmm..not sure where this EPROBE_DEFER comes from. But you are right,
as of_dma_configure_id() returns because of that so it didn't run to
arch_setup_dma_ops() call, which allocates an UNMANAGED iommu domain
and attaches DC to it on Tegra124.

By the way, anyone can accept this change? It doesn't feel right to
leave a regression in the newer release...

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-03 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18 22:07 [PATCH] iommu/tegra-smmu: Fix mc errors on tegra124-nyan Nicolin Chen
2021-02-18 22:07 ` Nicolin Chen
2021-02-20  5:16 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-02-20  5:16   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-02-23  2:13   ` Nicolin Chen
2021-02-23  2:13     ` Nicolin Chen
2021-02-23  5:10     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-02-23  5:10       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-02-25  6:27       ` Nicolin Chen
2021-02-25  6:27         ` Nicolin Chen
2021-02-27  9:59         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-02-27  9:59           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-02 23:08           ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2021-03-02 23:08             ` Nicolin Chen
2021-03-03  9:47             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-03  9:47               ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-28 15:25               ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-28 15:25                 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-28 15:36                 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-28 15:36                   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-02-22 13:15 ` Guillaume Tucker
2021-02-22 13:15   ` Guillaume Tucker
2021-03-03 18:26 ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-03 18:26   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-04 12:21 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-04 12:21   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-03-10 19:13 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-10 19:13   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-10 20:22   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-10 20:22     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-10 22:17     ` Nicolin Chen
2021-03-10 22:17       ` Nicolin Chen
2021-03-11 12:06       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-11 12:06         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-12  1:09         ` Nicolin Chen
2021-03-12  1:09           ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210302230856.GA22992@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=guillaume.tucker@collabora.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.