All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	jthierry@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:57:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315165800.5948-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315165800.5948-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Implement the following checks in the unwinder to detect the terminating
frame reliably:

	- The frame must end in task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe.

	- The frame type must be either TASK_FRAME or EL0_FRAME.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index ad20981dfda4..504cd161339d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -43,16 +43,22 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
 {
 	unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
 	struct stack_info info;
+	struct pt_regs *regs;
 
-	/* Terminal record; nothing to unwind */
-	if (!fp)
-		return -ENOENT;
+	if (!tsk)
+		tsk = current;
+	regs = task_pt_regs(tsk);
 
-	if (fp & 0xf)
+	/* Terminal record, nothing to unwind */
+	if (fp == (unsigned long) regs->stackframe) {
+		if (regs->frame_type == TASK_FRAME ||
+		    regs->frame_type == EL0_FRAME)
+			return -ENOENT;
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
-	if (!tsk)
-		tsk = current;
+	if (!fp || fp & 0xf)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, &info))
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	jthierry@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:57:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315165800.5948-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315165800.5948-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Implement the following checks in the unwinder to detect the terminating
frame reliably:

	- The frame must end in task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe.

	- The frame type must be either TASK_FRAME or EL0_FRAME.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index ad20981dfda4..504cd161339d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -43,16 +43,22 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
 {
 	unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
 	struct stack_info info;
+	struct pt_regs *regs;
 
-	/* Terminal record; nothing to unwind */
-	if (!fp)
-		return -ENOENT;
+	if (!tsk)
+		tsk = current;
+	regs = task_pt_regs(tsk);
 
-	if (fp & 0xf)
+	/* Terminal record, nothing to unwind */
+	if (fp == (unsigned long) regs->stackframe) {
+		if (regs->frame_type == TASK_FRAME ||
+		    regs->frame_type == EL0_FRAME)
+			return -ENOENT;
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
-	if (!tsk)
-		tsk = current;
+	if (!fp || fp & 0xf)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, &info))
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-15 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5997dfe8d261a3a543667b83c902883c1e4bd270>
2021-03-15 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57   ` madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57     ` madvenka
2021-03-18 15:09     ` Mark Brown
2021-03-18 15:09       ` Mark Brown
2021-03-18 20:26       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-18 20:26         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 12:30         ` Mark Brown
2021-03-19 12:30           ` Mark Brown
2021-03-19 14:29           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 14:29             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 18:19             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 18:19               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 22:03               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 22:03                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 10:24                 ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 10:24                   ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 12:39                   ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 12:39                     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-15 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57     ` madvenka
2021-03-18 17:40     ` Mark Brown
2021-03-18 17:40       ` Mark Brown
2021-03-18 22:22       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-18 22:22         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 13:22         ` Mark Brown
2021-03-19 13:22           ` Mark Brown
2021-03-19 14:40           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 14:40             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 15:02             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 15:02               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 16:20               ` Mark Brown
2021-03-19 16:20                 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-19 16:27                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-19 16:27                   ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 10:34     ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 10:34       ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-15 16:57   ` madvenka [this message]
2021-03-15 16:57     ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME madvenka
2021-03-18 18:26     ` Mark Brown
2021-03-18 18:26       ` Mark Brown
2021-03-18 20:29       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-18 20:29         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 10:36         ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 10:36           ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 12:40           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 12:40             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-15 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57     ` madvenka
2021-03-23 10:42     ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 10:42       ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 12:46       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 12:46         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 13:04         ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 13:04           ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 13:31           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 13:31             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 14:33             ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 14:33               ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 15:22               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 15:22                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-15 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE " madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57     ` madvenka
2021-03-23 10:51     ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 10:51       ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 12:56       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 12:56         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 13:36         ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 13:36           ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 13:38           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 13:38             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 14:15             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 14:15               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 14:57               ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 14:57                 ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 15:26                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 15:26                   ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 16:20                   ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 16:20                     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 17:02                     ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 17:02                       ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 17:23                       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 17:23                         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 17:27                         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 17:27                           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 18:27                         ` Mark Brown
2021-03-23 18:27                           ` Mark Brown
2021-03-23 20:23                           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 20:23                             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 18:30                         ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 18:30                           ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 20:24                           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 20:24                             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 21:04                             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 21:04                               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 16:48                   ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 16:48                     ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 16:53                     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 16:53                       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-23 17:09                       ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-23 17:09                         ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-15 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: Check the return PC of every stack frame madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57     ` madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57   ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] arm64: Detect kretprobed functions in stack trace madvenka
2021-03-15 16:57     ` madvenka
2021-03-15 16:58   ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: Implement arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2021-03-15 16:58     ` madvenka
2021-03-15 19:01   ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-03-15 19:01     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210315165800.5948-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.