From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniele.Palmas@telit.com,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support for secure regions in NAND memory
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:10:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322094040.GB70634@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319175659.17c9e8e6@collabora.com>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:56:59PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:30:10 +0530
> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > @@ -2737,6 +2783,11 @@ static int nand_read_page_swecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> > uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
> > unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> >
> > + /* Check if the region is secured */
> > + ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, ((loff_t)page << chip->page_shift), 0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> I'm lost. Why do you need to do that here if it's already done in
> nand_do_read_{ops,oob}()?
>
I think that's a mistake. Will remove it.
Thanks,
Mani
> > chip->ecc.read_page_raw(chip, buf, 1, page);
> >
> > for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniele.Palmas@telit.com,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support for secure regions in NAND memory
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:10:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322094040.GB70634@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319175659.17c9e8e6@collabora.com>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:56:59PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:30:10 +0530
> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > @@ -2737,6 +2783,11 @@ static int nand_read_page_swecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> > uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
> > unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> >
> > + /* Check if the region is secured */
> > + ret = nand_check_secure_region(chip, ((loff_t)page << chip->page_shift), 0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> I'm lost. Why do you need to do that here if it's already done in
> nand_do_read_{ops,oob}()?
>
I think that's a mistake. Will remove it.
Thanks,
Mani
> > chip->ecc.read_page_raw(chip, buf, 1, page);
> >
> > for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize)
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-19 15:00 [PATCH v7 0/3] Add support for secure regions in NAND Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 15:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 15:00 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Convert Qcom NANDc binding to YAML Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 15:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 15:00 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Add a property to declare secure regions in NAND chips Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 15:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 15:00 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support for secure regions in NAND memory Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 15:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 16:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-03-19 16:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-03-22 9:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-22 9:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-19 16:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-03-19 16:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-03-22 9:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-03-22 9:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210322094040.GB70634@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=Daniele.Palmas@telit.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.