Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> 
> Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml      |  127 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0f3ad47
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> +  SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> +  for multiple clusters.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> +
> +  reg:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +    description: |
> +      Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> +      HW bases in each frequency domain.
> +
> +  "#performance-domain-cells":

A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land 
first.

> +    description:
> +      Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
> +      representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing
> +      multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be
> +      any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
> +      provider.
> +    enum: [ 0, 1 ]
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - "#performance-domain-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    cpus {
> +            #address-cells = <1>;
> +            #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +            cpu0: cpu@0 {
> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> +                reg = <0x000>;
> +            };
> +
> +            cpu1: cpu@100 {
> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> +                reg = <0x100>;
> +            };
> +
> +            cpu2: cpu@200 {
> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> +                reg = <0x200>;
> +            };
> +
> +            cpu3: cpu@300 {
> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> +                reg = <0x300>;
> +            };
> +
> +            cpu4: cpu@400 {
> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 1>;

Seems a bit odd that a55 and a75 share a perf domain?


> +                reg = <0x400>;
> +            };
> +
> +            cpu5: cpu@500 {
> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> +                reg = <0x500>;
> +            };
> +
> +            cpu6: cpu@600 {
> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> +                reg = <0x600>;
> +            };
> +
> +            cpu7: cpu@700 {

Do we really need to show 8 cores to show how to use this binding?

> +                device_type = "cpu";
> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> +                enable-method = "psci";
> +                performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> +                reg = <0x700>;
> +            };
> +    };
> +
> +    /* ... */
> +
> +    soc {
> +        #address-cells = <2>;
> +        #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +        performance: performance-controller@11bc00 {
> +            compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw";
> +            reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>;
> +
> +            #performance-domain-cells = <1>;
> +        };
> +    };
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek