From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable/5.4..5.8] nvme-mpath: replace direct_make_request with generic_make_request
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:28:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407052806.GA18573@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00e36c71-9f2c-5b38-96fd-3d471382f6ac@grimberg.me>
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>>> Hence, we need to fix all the kernels that were before submit_bio_noacct was
>>> introduced.
>>
>> Why can we not just add submit_bio_noacct to the 5.4 kernel to correct
>> this? What commit id is that?
>
> Hey Greg,
>
> submit_bio_noacct was applied as part of a rework by Christoph that I
> didn't feel was suitable as a stable candidate. The commit-id is:
> ed00aabd5eb9fb44d6aff1173234a2e911b9fead
submit_bio_noacct really is just a new name for generic_make_request,
as the old one was horribly misleading. So this does use
submit_bio_noacct, just with its old name.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable/5.4..5.8] nvme-mpath: replace direct_make_request with generic_make_request
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:28:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407052806.GA18573@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00e36c71-9f2c-5b38-96fd-3d471382f6ac@grimberg.me>
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>>> Hence, we need to fix all the kernels that were before submit_bio_noacct was
>>> introduced.
>>
>> Why can we not just add submit_bio_noacct to the 5.4 kernel to correct
>> this? What commit id is that?
>
> Hey Greg,
>
> submit_bio_noacct was applied as part of a rework by Christoph that I
> didn't feel was suitable as a stable candidate. The commit-id is:
> ed00aabd5eb9fb44d6aff1173234a2e911b9fead
submit_bio_noacct really is just a new name for generic_make_request,
as the old one was horribly misleading. So this does use
submit_bio_noacct, just with its old name.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-02 20:08 [PATCH stable/5.4..5.8] nvme-mpath: replace direct_make_request with generic_make_request Sagi Grimberg
2021-04-02 20:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-04-03 6:10 ` Greg KH
2021-04-03 6:10 ` Greg KH
2021-04-07 1:04 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-04-07 1:04 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-04-07 5:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-04-07 5:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-07 23:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-04-07 23:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-04-09 9:43 ` Greg KH
2021-04-09 9:43 ` Greg KH
2021-04-09 9:33 ` Patch "nvme-mpath: replace direct_make_request with generic_make_request" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210407052806.GA18573@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.