All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: peng.fan@oss.nxp.com
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	o.rempel@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	festevam@gmail.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support remote cores booted before Linux Kernel
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:03:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407170314.GF418374@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617082235-15923-5-git-send-email-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:30:35PM +0800, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
>  - Add rsc_table to hold the resource table published by remote cores.
>  - Add attach hook.
>  - Add imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table to get resource table published by
>    remote processors.
>  - Add imx_rproc_detect_mode to detect remote cores' working mode.
>

This is describing _what_ is being done rather than _why_ it is done.

Moreover for patches 1 an 3 the subject line is tagged with "imx" while patches
2 and 4 have "imx_rproc".  I don't mind which one is used as long as it is
consistent.
 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 7cd09971d1a4..d6338872c6db 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
>  	struct mbox_chan		*rx_ch;
>  	struct work_struct		rproc_work;
>  	struct workqueue_struct		*workqueue;
> +	void __iomem			*rsc_table;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mq[] = {
> @@ -395,8 +396,26 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>  			__func__, vqid, err);
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct resource_table *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
> +{
> +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> +
> +	/* The resource table has already been mapped in imx_rproc_addr_init */
> +	if (!priv->rsc_table)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	*table_sz = SZ_1K;
> +	return (struct resource_table *)priv->rsc_table;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
> +	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
>  	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
>  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
>  	.kick		= imx_rproc_kick,
> @@ -404,6 +423,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
>  	.parse_fw	= imx_rproc_parse_fw,
>  	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> +	.get_loaded_rsc_table = imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
>  	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>  	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>  };
> @@ -470,6 +490,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
>  		}
>  		priv->mem[b].sys_addr = res.start;
>  		priv->mem[b].size = resource_size(&res);
> +		if (!strcmp(node->name, "rsc_table"))
> +			priv->rsc_table = priv->mem[b].cpu_addr;
>  		b++;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -536,6 +558,25 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> +{
> +	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> +	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg, &val);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read src\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!(val & dcfg->src_stop))
> +		priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -590,6 +631,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_put_mbox;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = imx_rproc_detect_mode(priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_put_mbox;
> +

With the above:

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

>  	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: peng.fan@oss.nxp.com
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	o.rempel@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	festevam@gmail.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support remote cores booted before Linux Kernel
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:03:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407170314.GF418374@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617082235-15923-5-git-send-email-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:30:35PM +0800, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
>  - Add rsc_table to hold the resource table published by remote cores.
>  - Add attach hook.
>  - Add imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table to get resource table published by
>    remote processors.
>  - Add imx_rproc_detect_mode to detect remote cores' working mode.
>

This is describing _what_ is being done rather than _why_ it is done.

Moreover for patches 1 an 3 the subject line is tagged with "imx" while patches
2 and 4 have "imx_rproc".  I don't mind which one is used as long as it is
consistent.
 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 7cd09971d1a4..d6338872c6db 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
>  	struct mbox_chan		*rx_ch;
>  	struct work_struct		rproc_work;
>  	struct workqueue_struct		*workqueue;
> +	void __iomem			*rsc_table;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mq[] = {
> @@ -395,8 +396,26 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>  			__func__, vqid, err);
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct resource_table *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
> +{
> +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> +
> +	/* The resource table has already been mapped in imx_rproc_addr_init */
> +	if (!priv->rsc_table)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	*table_sz = SZ_1K;
> +	return (struct resource_table *)priv->rsc_table;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
> +	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
>  	.start		= imx_rproc_start,
>  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
>  	.kick		= imx_rproc_kick,
> @@ -404,6 +423,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
>  	.parse_fw	= imx_rproc_parse_fw,
>  	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> +	.get_loaded_rsc_table = imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
>  	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>  	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>  };
> @@ -470,6 +490,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
>  		}
>  		priv->mem[b].sys_addr = res.start;
>  		priv->mem[b].size = resource_size(&res);
> +		if (!strcmp(node->name, "rsc_table"))
> +			priv->rsc_table = priv->mem[b].cpu_addr;
>  		b++;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -536,6 +558,25 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> +{
> +	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> +	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg, &val);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read src\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!(val & dcfg->src_stop))
> +		priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -590,6 +631,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_put_mbox;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = imx_rproc_detect_mode(priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_put_mbox;
> +

With the above:

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

>  	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-30  5:30 [PATCH V2 0/4] remoteproc: imx: support remote cores booted early peng.fan
2021-03-30  5:30 ` peng.fan
2021-03-30  5:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] remoteproc: imx: add missing of_node_put peng.fan
2021-03-30  5:30   ` peng.fan
2021-04-07 16:29   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-04-07 16:29     ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-03-30  5:30 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] remoteproc: imx_rproc: enlarge IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX peng.fan
2021-03-30  5:30   ` peng.fan
2021-03-30  5:30 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] remoteproc: imx: move memory parsing to rproc_ops peng.fan
2021-03-30  5:30   ` peng.fan
2021-04-07 16:36   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-04-07 16:36     ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-04-07 16:59   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-04-07 16:59     ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-03-30  5:30 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support remote cores booted before Linux Kernel peng.fan
2021-03-30  5:30   ` peng.fan
2021-04-07 17:03   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2021-04-07 17:03     ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-04-14  2:20 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] remoteproc: imx: support remote cores booted early patchwork-bot+linux-remoteproc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210407170314.GF418374@xps15 \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.