All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: "liaochang (A)" <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Cc: <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<mhiramat@kernel.org>, <penberg@kernel.org>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<me@packi.ch>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv/kprobe: fix kernel panic when invoking sys_read traced by kprobe
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:42:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412174245.75f0f717@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2aed1884-39d5-4573-71c7-89f805a8a92e@huawei.com>

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:16:26 +0800
"liaochang (A)" <liaochang1@huawei.com> wrote:


> 
> 
> 在 2021/4/8 19:20, Jisheng Zhang 写道:
> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:18:48 +0800
> > Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >>
> >> The execution of sys_read end up hitting a BUG_ON() in __find_get_block
> >> after installing kprobe at sys_read, the BUG message like the following:
> >>
> >> [   65.708663] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >> [   65.709987] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:1251!
> >> [   65.711283] Kernel BUG [#1]
> >> [   65.712032] Modules linked in:
> >> [   65.712925] CPU: 0 PID: 51 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4 #1
> >> [   65.714407] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> >> [   65.715696] epc : __find_get_block+0x218/0x2c8
> >> [   65.716835]  ra : __getblk_gfp+0x1c/0x4a
> >> [   65.717831] epc : ffffffe00019f11e ra : ffffffe00019f56a sp : ffffffe002437930
> >> [   65.719553]  gp : ffffffe000f06030 tp : ffffffe0015abc00 t0 : ffffffe00191e038
> >> [   65.721290]  t1 : ffffffe00191e038 t2 : 000000000000000a s0 : ffffffe002437960
> >> [   65.723051]  s1 : ffffffe00160ad00 a0 : ffffffe00160ad00 a1 : 000000000000012a
> >> [   65.724772]  a2 : 0000000000000400 a3 : 0000000000000008 a4 : 0000000000000040
> >> [   65.726545]  a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffe00191e000 a7 : 0000000000000000
> >> [   65.728308]  s2 : 000000000000012a s3 : 0000000000000400 s4 : 0000000000000008
> >> [   65.730049]  s5 : 000000000000006c s6 : ffffffe00240f800 s7 : ffffffe000f080a8
> >> [   65.731802]  s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : 000000000000012a s10: 0000000000000008
> >> [   65.733516]  s11: 0000000000000008 t3 : 00000000000003ff t4 : 000000000000000f
> >> [   65.734434]  t5 : 00000000000003ff t6 : 0000000000040000
> >> [   65.734613] status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003
> >> [   65.734901] Call Trace:
> >> [   65.735076] [<ffffffe00019f11e>] __find_get_block+0x218/0x2c8
> >> [   65.735417] [<ffffffe00020017a>] __ext4_get_inode_loc+0xb2/0x2f6
> >> [   65.735618] [<ffffffe000201b6c>] ext4_get_inode_loc+0x3a/0x8a
> >> [   65.735802] [<ffffffe000203380>] ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x2e/0x8c
> >> [   65.735999] [<ffffffe00020357a>] __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x4c/0x18e
> >> [   65.736208] [<ffffffe000206bb0>] ext4_dirty_inode+0x46/0x66
> >> [   65.736387] [<ffffffe000192914>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x12c/0x3da
> >> [   65.736576] [<ffffffe000180dd2>] touch_atime+0x146/0x150
> >> [   65.736748] [<ffffffe00010d762>] filemap_read+0x234/0x246
> >> [   65.736920] [<ffffffe00010d834>] generic_file_read_iter+0xc0/0x114
> >> [   65.737114] [<ffffffe0001f5d7a>] ext4_file_read_iter+0x42/0xea
> >> [   65.737310] [<ffffffe000163f2c>] new_sync_read+0xe2/0x15a
> >> [   65.737483] [<ffffffe000165814>] vfs_read+0xca/0xf2
> >> [   65.737641] [<ffffffe000165bae>] ksys_read+0x5e/0xc8
> >> [   65.737816] [<ffffffe000165c26>] sys_read+0xe/0x16
> >> [   65.737973] [<ffffffe000003972>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2
> >> [   65.738858] ---[ end trace fe93f985456c935d ]---
> >>
> >> A simple reproducer looks like:
> >>         echo 'p:myprobe sys_read fd=%a0 buf=%a1 count=%a2' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> >>         echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/myprobe/enable
> >>         cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
> >>  
> >
> > I can't reproduce the BUG_ON with the above step, I may miss something.
> >  
> My test platform versions
> Kernel: 0d02ec6b3136 Linux 5.12-rc4
> QEMU: fdd76fecdd Update version for v5.0.0 release
> 
> >> Here's what happens to hit that BUG_ON():
> >>
> >> 1) After installing kprobe at entry of sys_read, the first instruction
> >>    is replaced by 'ebreak' instruction on riscv64 platform.
> >>
> >> 2) Once kernel reach the 'ebreak' instruction at the entry of sys_read,
> >>    it trap into the riscv breakpoint handler, where it do something to
> >>    setup for coming single-step of origin instruction, including backup
> >>    the 'sstatus' in pt_regs, followed by disable interrupt during single
> >>    stepping via clear 'SIE' bit of 'sstatus' in pt_regs.
> >>
> >> 3) Then kernel restore to the instruction slot contains two instructions,
> >>    one is original instruction at entry of sys_read, the other is 'ebreak'.
> >>    Here it trigger a 'Instruction page fault' exception (value at 'scause'
> >>    is '0xc'), if PF is not filled into PageTabe for that slot yet.
> >>
> >> 4) Again kernel trap into page fault exception handler, where it choose
> >>    different policy according to the state of running kprobe. Because
> >>    afte 2) the state is KPROBE_HIT_SS, so kernel reset the current kprobe
> >>    and 'pc' points back to the probe address.
> >>
> >> 5) Because 'epc' point back to 'ebreak' instrution at sys_read probe,
> >>    kernel trap into breakpoint handler again, and repeat the operations
> >>    at 2), however 'sstatus' without 'SIE' is keep at 4), it cause the
> >>    real 'sstatus' saved at 2) is overwritten by the one withou 'SIE'.  
> >
> > Is kprobe_single_step_handler() handled firstly this time? thus we won't
> > enter kprobe_breakpoint_handler().
> >  
> No,because this time kcb->ss.ctx.match_addr points to the single-step slot,but
> instruction_pointer(regs) points to the first instruction of sys_read('ebreak')
> so the condition is not token eventually, then we enter kprobe_breakpoint_handler().
> 
> bool __kprobes
> kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>         struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> 
>         if ((kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending)
>             && (kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr == instruction_pointer(regs))) {
> 

Thanks for the information. Inspired by this patch, I think arm64 also
has the similar issue. I will send out a similar patch for arm64.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: "liaochang (A)" <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Cc: <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<mhiramat@kernel.org>, <penberg@kernel.org>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<me@packi.ch>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv/kprobe: fix kernel panic when invoking sys_read traced by kprobe
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:42:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412174245.75f0f717@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2aed1884-39d5-4573-71c7-89f805a8a92e@huawei.com>

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:16:26 +0800
"liaochang (A)" <liaochang1@huawei.com> wrote:


> 
> 
> 在 2021/4/8 19:20, Jisheng Zhang 写道:
> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:18:48 +0800
> > Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >>
> >> The execution of sys_read end up hitting a BUG_ON() in __find_get_block
> >> after installing kprobe at sys_read, the BUG message like the following:
> >>
> >> [   65.708663] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >> [   65.709987] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:1251!
> >> [   65.711283] Kernel BUG [#1]
> >> [   65.712032] Modules linked in:
> >> [   65.712925] CPU: 0 PID: 51 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4 #1
> >> [   65.714407] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> >> [   65.715696] epc : __find_get_block+0x218/0x2c8
> >> [   65.716835]  ra : __getblk_gfp+0x1c/0x4a
> >> [   65.717831] epc : ffffffe00019f11e ra : ffffffe00019f56a sp : ffffffe002437930
> >> [   65.719553]  gp : ffffffe000f06030 tp : ffffffe0015abc00 t0 : ffffffe00191e038
> >> [   65.721290]  t1 : ffffffe00191e038 t2 : 000000000000000a s0 : ffffffe002437960
> >> [   65.723051]  s1 : ffffffe00160ad00 a0 : ffffffe00160ad00 a1 : 000000000000012a
> >> [   65.724772]  a2 : 0000000000000400 a3 : 0000000000000008 a4 : 0000000000000040
> >> [   65.726545]  a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffe00191e000 a7 : 0000000000000000
> >> [   65.728308]  s2 : 000000000000012a s3 : 0000000000000400 s4 : 0000000000000008
> >> [   65.730049]  s5 : 000000000000006c s6 : ffffffe00240f800 s7 : ffffffe000f080a8
> >> [   65.731802]  s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : 000000000000012a s10: 0000000000000008
> >> [   65.733516]  s11: 0000000000000008 t3 : 00000000000003ff t4 : 000000000000000f
> >> [   65.734434]  t5 : 00000000000003ff t6 : 0000000000040000
> >> [   65.734613] status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003
> >> [   65.734901] Call Trace:
> >> [   65.735076] [<ffffffe00019f11e>] __find_get_block+0x218/0x2c8
> >> [   65.735417] [<ffffffe00020017a>] __ext4_get_inode_loc+0xb2/0x2f6
> >> [   65.735618] [<ffffffe000201b6c>] ext4_get_inode_loc+0x3a/0x8a
> >> [   65.735802] [<ffffffe000203380>] ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x2e/0x8c
> >> [   65.735999] [<ffffffe00020357a>] __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x4c/0x18e
> >> [   65.736208] [<ffffffe000206bb0>] ext4_dirty_inode+0x46/0x66
> >> [   65.736387] [<ffffffe000192914>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x12c/0x3da
> >> [   65.736576] [<ffffffe000180dd2>] touch_atime+0x146/0x150
> >> [   65.736748] [<ffffffe00010d762>] filemap_read+0x234/0x246
> >> [   65.736920] [<ffffffe00010d834>] generic_file_read_iter+0xc0/0x114
> >> [   65.737114] [<ffffffe0001f5d7a>] ext4_file_read_iter+0x42/0xea
> >> [   65.737310] [<ffffffe000163f2c>] new_sync_read+0xe2/0x15a
> >> [   65.737483] [<ffffffe000165814>] vfs_read+0xca/0xf2
> >> [   65.737641] [<ffffffe000165bae>] ksys_read+0x5e/0xc8
> >> [   65.737816] [<ffffffe000165c26>] sys_read+0xe/0x16
> >> [   65.737973] [<ffffffe000003972>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2
> >> [   65.738858] ---[ end trace fe93f985456c935d ]---
> >>
> >> A simple reproducer looks like:
> >>         echo 'p:myprobe sys_read fd=%a0 buf=%a1 count=%a2' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> >>         echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/myprobe/enable
> >>         cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
> >>  
> >
> > I can't reproduce the BUG_ON with the above step, I may miss something.
> >  
> My test platform versions
> Kernel: 0d02ec6b3136 Linux 5.12-rc4
> QEMU: fdd76fecdd Update version for v5.0.0 release
> 
> >> Here's what happens to hit that BUG_ON():
> >>
> >> 1) After installing kprobe at entry of sys_read, the first instruction
> >>    is replaced by 'ebreak' instruction on riscv64 platform.
> >>
> >> 2) Once kernel reach the 'ebreak' instruction at the entry of sys_read,
> >>    it trap into the riscv breakpoint handler, where it do something to
> >>    setup for coming single-step of origin instruction, including backup
> >>    the 'sstatus' in pt_regs, followed by disable interrupt during single
> >>    stepping via clear 'SIE' bit of 'sstatus' in pt_regs.
> >>
> >> 3) Then kernel restore to the instruction slot contains two instructions,
> >>    one is original instruction at entry of sys_read, the other is 'ebreak'.
> >>    Here it trigger a 'Instruction page fault' exception (value at 'scause'
> >>    is '0xc'), if PF is not filled into PageTabe for that slot yet.
> >>
> >> 4) Again kernel trap into page fault exception handler, where it choose
> >>    different policy according to the state of running kprobe. Because
> >>    afte 2) the state is KPROBE_HIT_SS, so kernel reset the current kprobe
> >>    and 'pc' points back to the probe address.
> >>
> >> 5) Because 'epc' point back to 'ebreak' instrution at sys_read probe,
> >>    kernel trap into breakpoint handler again, and repeat the operations
> >>    at 2), however 'sstatus' without 'SIE' is keep at 4), it cause the
> >>    real 'sstatus' saved at 2) is overwritten by the one withou 'SIE'.  
> >
> > Is kprobe_single_step_handler() handled firstly this time? thus we won't
> > enter kprobe_breakpoint_handler().
> >  
> No,because this time kcb->ss.ctx.match_addr points to the single-step slot,but
> instruction_pointer(regs) points to the first instruction of sys_read('ebreak')
> so the condition is not token eventually, then we enter kprobe_breakpoint_handler().
> 
> bool __kprobes
> kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>         struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> 
>         if ((kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending)
>             && (kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr == instruction_pointer(regs))) {
> 

Thanks for the information. Inspired by this patch, I think arm64 also
has the similar issue. I will send out a similar patch for arm64.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-30  8:18 [PATCH] riscv/kprobe: fix kernel panic when invoking sys_read traced by kprobe Liao Chang
2021-03-30  8:18 ` Liao Chang
2021-04-08 11:20 ` Jisheng Zhang
2021-04-08 11:20   ` Jisheng Zhang
2021-04-09  4:16   ` liaochang (A)
2021-04-09  4:16     ` liaochang (A)
2021-04-12  9:42     ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2021-04-12  9:42       ` Jisheng Zhang
2021-04-23  1:52 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-23  1:52   ` Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210412174245.75f0f717@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=me@packi.ch \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.