From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 resend] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unpopulated zones PCP structures unreachable during hot remove
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:49:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210413094920.GC3697@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1243b7b-fa4c-496f-5bfc-c83c7cee81cf@suse.cz>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 4/12/21 4:08 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:40:18PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 4/12/21 2:08 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > the pageset structures in place would be much more straight-forward
> > assuming the structures were not allocated in the zone that is being
> > hot-removed.
>
> I would expect this is not possible, at least for ZONE_MOVABLE, as the percpu
> allocations should be GFP_KERNEL.
True.
> And it's not realistic to expect offlining to
> succeed at all without using ZONE_MOVABLE.
>
> AFAIK even Oscar's work on using the node to self-contain its own structures is
> only applicable to struct pages, not percpu allocations?
That I don't know as I didn't check although in general, it would be
somewhat unfortunate if per-cpu structures were remote. It wouldn't be
critical given that they'll be in cache assuming the per-cpu structures
are not straddling cache lines.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 12:08 [PATCH v2 resend] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unpopulated zones PCP structures unreachable during hot remove Mel Gorman
2021-04-12 12:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-12 12:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-12 14:08 ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-12 14:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-12 15:27 ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-12 16:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-13 9:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-13 9:49 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-04-13 10:16 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 6:44 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 6:40 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14 7:18 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210413094920.GC3697@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.