All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: OTP nvmem provider support
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:44:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416184423.GA3715339@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416114928.27758-1-michael@walle.cc>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> The goal is to fetch a (base) MAC address from the OTP region of a SPI NOR
> flash.
> 
> This is the first part, where I try to add the nvmem provider support to
> the MTD core.
> 
> I'm not sure about the device tree bindings. Consider the following two
> variants:
> 
> (1)
>     flash@0 {
>         ..
> 
>         otp {
>             compatible = "mtd-user-otp";

mtd is a linuxism. Why not just 'nvmem-cells' here or as a fallback if 
we come up with a better name? 

>             #address-cells = <1>;
>             #size-cells = <1>;
> 
>             serial-number@0 {
>                 reg = <0x0 0x8>;
>             };
>         };
>     };
> 
> (2)
>     flash@0 {
>         ..
> 
>         otp {
>             compatible = "mtd-user-otp";
>             #address-cells = <1>;
>             #size-cells = <1>;
> 
> 			some-useful-name {
>                 compatible = "nvmem-cells";
> 
>                 serial-number@0 {
>                     reg = <0x0 0x8>;
>                 };
> 			};
>         };
>     };
> 
> Both bindings use a subnode "opt[-N]". We cannot have the nvmem cells as
> children to the flash node because of the legacy partition binding.
> 
> (1) seems to be the form which is used almost everywhere in the kernel.
> That is, the nvmem cells are just children of the parent node.
> 
> (2) seem to be more natural, because there might also be other properties
> inside the otp subnode and might be more future-proof.
> 
> At the moment this patch implements (1).

I think approach (1) seems fine.

Rob

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: OTP nvmem provider support
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:44:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416184423.GA3715339@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416114928.27758-1-michael@walle.cc>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> The goal is to fetch a (base) MAC address from the OTP region of a SPI NOR
> flash.
> 
> This is the first part, where I try to add the nvmem provider support to
> the MTD core.
> 
> I'm not sure about the device tree bindings. Consider the following two
> variants:
> 
> (1)
>     flash@0 {
>         ..
> 
>         otp {
>             compatible = "mtd-user-otp";

mtd is a linuxism. Why not just 'nvmem-cells' here or as a fallback if 
we come up with a better name? 

>             #address-cells = <1>;
>             #size-cells = <1>;
> 
>             serial-number@0 {
>                 reg = <0x0 0x8>;
>             };
>         };
>     };
> 
> (2)
>     flash@0 {
>         ..
> 
>         otp {
>             compatible = "mtd-user-otp";
>             #address-cells = <1>;
>             #size-cells = <1>;
> 
> 			some-useful-name {
>                 compatible = "nvmem-cells";
> 
>                 serial-number@0 {
>                     reg = <0x0 0x8>;
>                 };
> 			};
>         };
>     };
> 
> Both bindings use a subnode "opt[-N]". We cannot have the nvmem cells as
> children to the flash node because of the legacy partition binding.
> 
> (1) seems to be the form which is used almost everywhere in the kernel.
> That is, the nvmem cells are just children of the parent node.
> 
> (2) seem to be more natural, because there might also be other properties
> inside the otp subnode and might be more future-proof.
> 
> At the moment this patch implements (1).

I think approach (1) seems fine.

Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 11:49 [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: OTP nvmem provider support Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: core: allow specifying of_node Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: mtd: add YAML schema for the generic MTD bindings Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: mtd: add OTP bindings Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 18:30   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:30     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:46     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:46       ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: mtd: spi-nor: add otp property Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 18:30   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:30     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd: core: add OTP nvmem provider support Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 18:44 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-04-16 18:44   ` [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: " Rob Herring
2021-04-16 19:26   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 19:26     ` Michael Walle
2021-04-20 14:08     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 14:08       ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 15:03       ` Michael Walle
2021-04-20 15:03         ` Michael Walle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210416184423.GA3715339@robh.at.kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.