All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: armv8_deprecated: Fix swp_handler() signal generation
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:22:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202104210515.VoF3YT1J-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420165001.3790670-1-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4911 bytes --]

Hi Liam,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on arm-perf/for-next/perf xlnx/master arm/for-next soc/for-next kvmarm/next linus/master v5.12-rc8 next-20210420]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Liam-Howlett/arm64-armv8_deprecated-Fix-swp_handler-signal-generation/20210421-005252
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/96a011695861072d32851ba3a104b19106955869
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Liam-Howlett/arm64-armv8_deprecated-Fix-swp_handler-signal-generation/20210421-005252
        git checkout 96a011695861072d32851ba3a104b19106955869
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross W=1 ARCH=arm64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c: In function 'swp_handler':
>> arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c:418:11: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Wparentheses]
     418 |  else if (res = -ENXIO) /* Unaligned pointer */
         |           ^~~


vim +418 arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c

   365	
   366	/*
   367	 * swp_handler logs the id of calling process, dissects the instruction, sanity
   368	 * checks the memory location, calls emulate_swpX for the actual operation and
   369	 * deals with fixup/error handling before returning
   370	 */
   371	static int swp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 instr)
   372	{
   373		u32 destreg, data, type, address = 0;
   374		const void __user *user_ptr;
   375		int rn, rt2, res = 0;
   376	
   377		perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS, 1, regs, regs->pc);
   378	
   379		type = instr & TYPE_SWPB;
   380	
   381		switch (aarch32_check_condition(instr, regs->pstate)) {
   382		case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS:
   383			break;
   384		case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL:
   385			/* Condition failed - return to next instruction */
   386			goto ret;
   387		case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND:
   388			/* If unconditional encoding - not a SWP, undef */
   389			return -EFAULT;
   390		default:
   391			return -EINVAL;
   392		}
   393	
   394		rn = aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RN_OFFSET);
   395		rt2 = aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RT2_OFFSET);
   396	
   397		address = (u32)regs->user_regs.regs[rn];
   398		data	= (u32)regs->user_regs.regs[rt2];
   399		destreg = aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RT_OFFSET);
   400	
   401		pr_debug("addr in r%d->0x%08x, dest is r%d, source in r%d->0x%08x)\n",
   402			rn, address, destreg,
   403			aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RT2_OFFSET), data);
   404	
   405		/* Check access in reasonable access range for both SWP and SWPB */
   406		user_ptr = (const void __user *)(unsigned long)(address & ~3);
   407		if (!access_ok(user_ptr, 4)) {
   408			pr_debug("SWP{B} emulation: access to 0x%08x not allowed!\n",
   409				 address);
   410			goto e_access;
   411		}
   412	
   413		res = emulate_swpX(address, &data, type);
   414		if (!res)
   415			regs->user_regs.regs[destreg] = data;
   416		else if (res == -EFAULT)
   417			goto e_fault;
 > 418		else if (res = -ENXIO) /* Unaligned pointer */
   419			goto e_align;
   420	
   421	ret:
   422		if (type == TYPE_SWPB)
   423			trace_instruction_emulation("swpb", regs->pc);
   424		else
   425			trace_instruction_emulation("swp", regs->pc);
   426	
   427		pr_warn_ratelimited("\"%s\" (%ld) uses obsolete SWP{B} instruction at 0x%llx\n",
   428				current->comm, (unsigned long)current->pid, regs->pc);
   429	
   430		arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
   431		return 0;
   432	
   433	e_fault:
   434		pr_debug("SWP{B} emulation: access caused memory abort!\n");
   435		arm64_notify_segfault(address);
   436		return 0;
   437	
   438	e_align:
   439	e_access:
   440		force_signal_inject(SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, address, 0);
   441		return 0;
   442	}
   443	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 76777 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: armv8_deprecated: Fix swp_handler() signal generation
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:22:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202104210515.VoF3YT1J-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420165001.3790670-1-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4789 bytes --]

Hi Liam,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on arm-perf/for-next/perf xlnx/master arm/for-next soc/for-next kvmarm/next linus/master v5.12-rc8 next-20210420]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Liam-Howlett/arm64-armv8_deprecated-Fix-swp_handler-signal-generation/20210421-005252
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/96a011695861072d32851ba3a104b19106955869
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Liam-Howlett/arm64-armv8_deprecated-Fix-swp_handler-signal-generation/20210421-005252
        git checkout 96a011695861072d32851ba3a104b19106955869
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross W=1 ARCH=arm64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c: In function 'swp_handler':
>> arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c:418:11: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Wparentheses]
     418 |  else if (res = -ENXIO) /* Unaligned pointer */
         |           ^~~


vim +418 arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c

   365	
   366	/*
   367	 * swp_handler logs the id of calling process, dissects the instruction, sanity
   368	 * checks the memory location, calls emulate_swpX for the actual operation and
   369	 * deals with fixup/error handling before returning
   370	 */
   371	static int swp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 instr)
   372	{
   373		u32 destreg, data, type, address = 0;
   374		const void __user *user_ptr;
   375		int rn, rt2, res = 0;
   376	
   377		perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS, 1, regs, regs->pc);
   378	
   379		type = instr & TYPE_SWPB;
   380	
   381		switch (aarch32_check_condition(instr, regs->pstate)) {
   382		case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS:
   383			break;
   384		case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL:
   385			/* Condition failed - return to next instruction */
   386			goto ret;
   387		case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND:
   388			/* If unconditional encoding - not a SWP, undef */
   389			return -EFAULT;
   390		default:
   391			return -EINVAL;
   392		}
   393	
   394		rn = aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RN_OFFSET);
   395		rt2 = aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RT2_OFFSET);
   396	
   397		address = (u32)regs->user_regs.regs[rn];
   398		data	= (u32)regs->user_regs.regs[rt2];
   399		destreg = aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RT_OFFSET);
   400	
   401		pr_debug("addr in r%d->0x%08x, dest is r%d, source in r%d->0x%08x)\n",
   402			rn, address, destreg,
   403			aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(instr, A32_RT2_OFFSET), data);
   404	
   405		/* Check access in reasonable access range for both SWP and SWPB */
   406		user_ptr = (const void __user *)(unsigned long)(address & ~3);
   407		if (!access_ok(user_ptr, 4)) {
   408			pr_debug("SWP{B} emulation: access to 0x%08x not allowed!\n",
   409				 address);
   410			goto e_access;
   411		}
   412	
   413		res = emulate_swpX(address, &data, type);
   414		if (!res)
   415			regs->user_regs.regs[destreg] = data;
   416		else if (res == -EFAULT)
   417			goto e_fault;
 > 418		else if (res = -ENXIO) /* Unaligned pointer */
   419			goto e_align;
   420	
   421	ret:
   422		if (type == TYPE_SWPB)
   423			trace_instruction_emulation("swpb", regs->pc);
   424		else
   425			trace_instruction_emulation("swp", regs->pc);
   426	
   427		pr_warn_ratelimited("\"%s\" (%ld) uses obsolete SWP{B} instruction at 0x%llx\n",
   428				current->comm, (unsigned long)current->pid, regs->pc);
   429	
   430		arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
   431		return 0;
   432	
   433	e_fault:
   434		pr_debug("SWP{B} emulation: access caused memory abort!\n");
   435		arm64_notify_segfault(address);
   436		return 0;
   437	
   438	e_align:
   439	e_access:
   440		force_signal_inject(SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, address, 0);
   441		return 0;
   442	}
   443	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 76777 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20 16:50 [PATCH 1/3] arm64: armv8_deprecated: Fix swp_handler() signal generation Liam Howlett
2021-04-20 16:50 ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-20 16:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] arch/arm64/kernel/traps: Use find_vma_intersection() in traps for setting si_code Liam Howlett
2021-04-20 16:50   ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-22 12:53   ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 12:53     ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 18:56     ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-22 18:56       ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-20 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: signal: sigreturn() and rt_sigreturn() sometime returns the wrong signals Liam Howlett
2021-04-20 16:50   ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-22 12:48   ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 12:48     ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 18:22     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-22 18:22       ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-22 19:24       ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-22 19:24         ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-23 18:17         ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-23 18:17           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-23 20:03           ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-23 20:03             ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-29 17:52             ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-29 17:52               ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-30 18:48               ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-30 18:48                 ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-30 19:57                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-30 19:57                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-30 20:31                   ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-30 20:31                     ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-20 21:22 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-04-20 21:22   ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: armv8_deprecated: Fix swp_handler() signal generation kernel test robot
2021-04-21 15:47   ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-21 15:47     ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-21 15:47     ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-22 12:59 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 12:59   ` Will Deacon
2021-04-23  1:00   ` Liam Howlett
2021-04-23  1:00     ` Liam Howlett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202104210515.VoF3YT1J-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.