All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com,
	slp@redhat.com, miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dax: Add an enum for specifying dax wakup mode
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:21:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210421172130.GE1579961@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421161624.GJ3596236@casper.infradead.org>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:16:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:56:31AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * enum dax_entry_wake_mode: waitqueue wakeup toggle
> 
> s/toggle/behaviour/ ?

Will do.

> 
> > + * @WAKE_NEXT: wake only the first waiter in the waitqueue
> > + * @WAKE_ALL: wake all waiters in the waitqueue
> > + */
> > +enum dax_entry_wake_mode {
> > +	WAKE_NEXT,
> > +	WAKE_ALL,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static wait_queue_head_t *dax_entry_waitqueue(struct xa_state *xas,
> >  		void *entry, struct exceptional_entry_key *key)
> >  {
> > @@ -182,7 +192,8 @@ static int wake_exceptional_entry_func(w
> >   * The important information it's conveying is whether the entry at
> >   * this index used to be a PMD entry.
> >   */
> > -static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, bool wake_all)
> > +static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry,
> > +			   enum dax_entry_wake_mode mode)
> 
> It's an awfully verbose name.  'dax_wake_mode'?

Sure. Will change.

Vivek
> 
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 1/3] dax: Add an enum for specifying dax wakup mode
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:21:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210421172130.GE1579961@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421161624.GJ3596236@casper.infradead.org>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:16:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:56:31AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * enum dax_entry_wake_mode: waitqueue wakeup toggle
> 
> s/toggle/behaviour/ ?

Will do.

> 
> > + * @WAKE_NEXT: wake only the first waiter in the waitqueue
> > + * @WAKE_ALL: wake all waiters in the waitqueue
> > + */
> > +enum dax_entry_wake_mode {
> > +	WAKE_NEXT,
> > +	WAKE_ALL,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static wait_queue_head_t *dax_entry_waitqueue(struct xa_state *xas,
> >  		void *entry, struct exceptional_entry_key *key)
> >  {
> > @@ -182,7 +192,8 @@ static int wake_exceptional_entry_func(w
> >   * The important information it's conveying is whether the entry at
> >   * this index used to be a PMD entry.
> >   */
> > -static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, bool wake_all)
> > +static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry,
> > +			   enum dax_entry_wake_mode mode)
> 
> It's an awfully verbose name.  'dax_wake_mode'?

Sure. Will change.

Vivek
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	virtio-fs@redhat.com, slp@redhat.com, miklos@szeredi.hu,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dax: Add an enum for specifying dax wakup mode
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:21:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210421172130.GE1579961@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421161624.GJ3596236@casper.infradead.org>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:16:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:56:31AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * enum dax_entry_wake_mode: waitqueue wakeup toggle
> 
> s/toggle/behaviour/ ?

Will do.

> 
> > + * @WAKE_NEXT: wake only the first waiter in the waitqueue
> > + * @WAKE_ALL: wake all waiters in the waitqueue
> > + */
> > +enum dax_entry_wake_mode {
> > +	WAKE_NEXT,
> > +	WAKE_ALL,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static wait_queue_head_t *dax_entry_waitqueue(struct xa_state *xas,
> >  		void *entry, struct exceptional_entry_key *key)
> >  {
> > @@ -182,7 +192,8 @@ static int wake_exceptional_entry_func(w
> >   * The important information it's conveying is whether the entry at
> >   * this index used to be a PMD entry.
> >   */
> > -static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, bool wake_all)
> > +static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry,
> > +			   enum dax_entry_wake_mode mode)
> 
> It's an awfully verbose name.  'dax_wake_mode'?

Sure. Will change.

Vivek
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-19 21:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] dax: Fix missed wakeup in put_unlocked_entry() Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dax: Add an enum for specifying dax wakup mode Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36   ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36   ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-20  7:19   ` Greg Kurz
2021-04-20  7:19     ` Greg Kurz
2021-04-20  7:19     ` Greg Kurz
2021-04-21  9:24   ` Jan Kara
2021-04-21  9:24     ` Jan Kara
2021-04-21  9:24     ` [Virtio-fs] " Jan Kara
2021-04-21 15:56     ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 15:56       ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 15:56       ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 16:16       ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-21 16:16         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-21 16:16         ` [Virtio-fs] " Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-21 17:21         ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2021-04-21 17:21           ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 17:21           ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: Add a wakeup mode parameter to put_unlocked_entry() Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36   ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36   ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-20  7:34   ` Greg Kurz
2021-04-20  7:34     ` Greg Kurz
2021-04-20 14:00     ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-20 14:00       ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-20 14:00       ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 19:09       ` Dan Williams
2021-04-21 19:09         ` Dan Williams
2021-04-21 19:09         ` Dan Williams
2021-04-21 19:13         ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 19:13           ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 19:13           ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-22  6:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22  6:24           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22  6:24           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22 16:12           ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-22 16:12             ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-22 16:12             ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-22 20:01           ` Dan Williams
2021-04-22 20:01             ` Dan Williams
2021-04-22 20:01             ` Dan Williams
2021-04-22 20:07             ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-22 20:07               ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-22 20:07               ` Vivek Goyal
2021-05-17 17:10           ` Dan Williams
2021-05-17 17:10             ` Dan Williams
2021-05-17 17:10             ` Dan Williams
2021-04-21 17:39     ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 17:39       ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 17:39       ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21  9:25   ` Jan Kara
2021-04-21  9:25     ` Jan Kara
2021-04-21  9:25     ` [Virtio-fs] " Jan Kara
2021-04-19 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] dax: Wake up all waiters after invalidating dax entry Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36   ` Vivek Goyal
2021-04-19 21:36   ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21  9:26   ` Jan Kara
2021-04-21  9:26     ` Jan Kara
2021-04-21  9:26     ` [Virtio-fs] " Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210421172130.GE1579961@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.